Jump to content

The Democrat Thread


Rex Kickass

Recommended Posts

Sp Lawrence O'Donnell challenged Tagg Romney to a fight on the air for saying he thought about taking a swing on Obama, after a 5 minute rant where he called all the males in the Romney family cowards and chicken hawks. Jesus dude

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 20.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • StrangeSox

    3536

  • Balta1701

    3002

  • lostfan

    1460

  • BigSqwert

    1397

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

QUOTE (lostfan @ Oct 18, 2012 -> 10:35 PM)
Sp Lawrence O'Donnell challenged Tagg Romney to a fight on the air for saying he thought about taking a swing on Obama, after a 5 minute rant where he called all the males in the Romney family cowards and chicken hawks. Jesus dude

 

He's gotten out of hand. He's been trending that direction for a while now, makes Ed Schultz look like a p****. Maddow is the only one I truly care for on MSNBC, but I don't mind Chris Matthews either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 12:05 AM)
He's gotten out of hand. He's been trending that direction for a while now, makes Ed Schultz look like a p****. Maddow is the only one I truly care for on MSNBC, but I don't mind Chris Matthews either.

 

Wow, seriously? Maddow and Matthews? In some way I can understand Maddow, but not really...but Matthews is a f***ing knob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SOXOBAMA @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 09:00 AM)
I can't see anyone voting for a person who supported the Vietnam War but decided to be a draft dodger.

 

I can't see how people vote for 90% of the these morons that somehow get into congress/senate/governor/city council positions, etc...but somehow they get there. What's more astounding is they often get re-elected without trying, despite how stupid they've shown they are while in power.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Y2HH @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 03:13 PM)
I can't see how people vote for 90% of the these morons that somehow get into congress/senate/governor/city council positions, etc...but somehow they get there. What's more astounding is they often get re-elected without trying, despite how stupid they've shown they are while in power.

 

yet everybody love their own congressman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SOXOBAMA @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 10:55 AM)
Nat'l polls published in past 24 hours: Obama +3.2, Obama +3, Obama +3, Obama +1,Obama +0.6, Obama +0.5, TIE, Romney +7

According to Nate Silver, Obama's chances of winning are over 70% again :headbang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (SOXOBAMA @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 10:21 AM)
Unemployment rate drops in 41 states, including most swing states.

How convenient that they've all dropped right before the election. It's obvious all of those states will revise their numbers in November or December.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Oct 18, 2012 -> 03:13 PM)
I actually think this is perfectly okay. I would want to know if a candidate is going to directly cause me peril at my place of work. If I work in pornography and Mitt Romney plans to ban it, I would like to know about this. Then the onus is on me to verify what my employer says, just like anything I hear anywhere else.

 

If the employers want to somehow leverage people's jobs to bundle votes, then they can get in trouble as they should. In the end, more people talking is a good thing even if they might talk out of their ass (like anyone might do).

 

It's a form of intimidation and works to suppress the speech of employees. How comfortable would you be with an Obama bumper sticker on your car if your boss told you there will be cutbacks if he wins?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 01:37 PM)
It's a form of intimidation and works to suppress the speech of employees. How comfortable would you be with an Obama bumper sticker on your car if your boss told you there will be cutbacks if he wins?

 

Business owners don't get less of a voice just because people might listen more. You can't suppress the information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jake @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 01:53 PM)
Business owners don't get less of a voice just because people might listen more. You can't suppress the information.

 

they are legally allowed to tell employees they will be fired if Obama wins, and I don't think that should be illegal. But it is, imo, immoral to use that position of authority and control over others' livelihood for political messaging.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 06:57 PM)
they are legally allowed to tell employees they will be fired if Obama wins, and I don't think that should be illegal. But it is, imo, immoral to use that position of authority and control over others' livelihood for political messaging.

 

Eh, I think it's more of a sexy news story than anything. If I worked there i'd just be like "meh".

 

In most newspapers they are seriously hindered from showing any outward political allegiances (QUEUE HYSTERICAL LAUGHTER FROM CERTAIN POSTERS), and I'm sure most don't care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 19, 2012 -> 01:58 PM)
In most newspapers they are seriously hindered from showing any outward political allegiances (QUEUE HYSTERICAL LAUGHTER FROM CERTAIN POSTERS), and I'm sure most don't care.

 

I remember when NPR fired their weekend opera show person because she attended an OWS rally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...