Jump to content

The Democrat Thread


Rex Kickass

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 20.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • StrangeSox

    3536

  • Balta1701

    3002

  • lostfan

    1460

  • BigSqwert

    1397

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 02:24 PM)
Nobody's made an issue out of Sotomayor's "wise Latina" comment? Nobody?

The "MSM" hasn't. And obviously those Demcrats on the Hill like to twist it around as "no big deal".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 04:18 PM)
The "MSM" hasn't. And obviously those Demcrats on the Hill like to twist it around as "no big deal".

lol, bulls***, it's in damn near every article written about her, furthermore GOP senators have been talking about it so it gets covered by default.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 04:07 PM)
I remember when Obama called rural americans "bitter" and nobody talked about it.

Last spring you may have heard about this guy named Jeremiah Wright if you dug deep enough. Hardly anyone's ever heard of him though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 03:18 PM)
Because if you actually read the context, it's totally not.

I've read the whole damn thing she used it in, and I've read at least three other times she's made the same point. She's aboslutely 100% racially biased. Why's she scared to admit it? I mean, after all, affirmative action is how she got to where she is. If it's so "bad" then she should be able to stand behind everthing she's ever said. So why hide it?

 

Try again, Mr. everything the Democrats do is the best thing EVAR.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 03:18 PM)
The "MSM" hasn't. And obviously those Demcrats on the Hill like to twist it around as "no big deal".

 

It's mentioned in just about every report about her nomination. No, they haven't attacked her over it, but ideally that's not the media's job to do anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 03:25 PM)
It's mentioned in just about every report about her nomination. No, they haven't attacked her over it, but ideally that's not the media's job to do anyway.

Wow, then why did they do it for the last 8 years and CONTINUE to do it every chance they get (with the exception of about two weeks after 9/11).

 

I agree with you, but they certainly do it every opportunity they get. See Sarah Palin. I may not like or agree with Sarah Palin, but she does get treated a whole lot different then someone with a (D) behind their name. Not to mention Sotomayor... I mean hell, if this were a ® up there, she wouldn't have even made the hearings, she would have been forced out. Kind of like pubic hairs on a coke can, or something.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 04:33 PM)
Wow, then why did they do it for the last 8 years and CONTINUE to do it every chance they get (with the exception of about two weeks after 9/11).

 

I agree with you, but they certainly do it every opportunity they get. See Sarah Palin. I may not like or agree with Sarah Palin, but she does get treated a whole lot different then someone with a (D) behind their name. Not to mention Sotomayor... I mean hell, if this were a ® up there, she wouldn't have even made the hearings, she would have been forced out. Kind of like pubic hairs on a coke can, or something.

wtf?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hill's testimony included a wide variety of language she allegedly was subjected to by Thomas that she found inappropriate:

 

He spoke about acts that he had seen in pornographic films involving such matters as women having sex with animals and films showing group sex or rape scenes....On several occasions, Thomas told me graphically of his own sexual prowess....Thomas was drinking a Coke in his office, he got up from the table at which we were working, went over to his desk to get the Coke, looked at the can and asked, "Who has put pubic hair on my Coke?"

 

LINK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

:lolhitting

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jul 16, 2009 -> 02:52 PM)
Not sure where else to post this but i think these 2 smileys should be banned from the buster:

 

:bang

 

:lolhitting

 

I find them extremely annoying in the context they're typically used in here.

:lolhitting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

:lolhitting

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...