NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Sep 28, 2009 -> 08:28 PM) Or spend the rest of their life in the Federal Pen at Marion enduring a living hell. The innocent people who get executed at least get put out of their misery. Prison terms can be ended with the person still alive. Prison is still living. Justice needs to be served, but justice does not require death. You can take your slippery slope all the way down to traffic tickets if you'd like - I personally draw the line at deciding life and death. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) Police attack students on U-Pitt campus during G20 summit. Some of them are just students on their own campus walking by. This apparently happened at one of the more popular bar streets in the Oakland area, not anywhere near the conference. Edited September 29, 2009 by StrangeSox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Cops enjoy beating college kids?! Wow! I know NSS, I was just saying that the difference between life in prison and death is negligible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Some asshole on Facebook created and distributed a poll asking if Obama should be killed. USSS is investigating, and the poll is of course no longer available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 08:27 AM) Some asshole on Facebook created and distributed a poll asking if Obama should be killed. USSS is investigating, and the poll is of course no longer available. some people really are stupid. During the primaries, my wife made some comment on our website about how she wished Hillary would get hit by a car or something like that. I made her take it down because i didnt want the Secret Service knocking at my door. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 02:54 PM) some people really are stupid. During the primaries, my wife made some comment on our website about how she wished Hillary would get hit by a car or something like that. I made her take it down because i didnt want the Secret Service knocking at my door. so are you referring to your wife as one of those "some people" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:02 AM) so are you referring to your wife as one of those "some people" if the shoe fits. she was a bit pissed I made her take it off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 (edited) Bush White House Denies J.K. Rowling and Ted Kennedy Presidential Medal of Freedom Latimer writes that administration officials objected to giving author J.K. Rowling the Presidential Medal of Freedom because her writing “encouraged witchcraft” (p. 201):This was the same sort of narrow thinking that led people in the White House to actually object to giving the author J.K. Rowling a presidential medal becau s e the Harry Potter boo k s encouraged withcraft. atimer also writes that when he suggested bestowing the honor upon Ted Kennedy, who had just been diagnosed with a brain tumor, fellow speechwriter Marc Thiessen objected because Kennedy “was a liberal” (p. 201): When Ted Kennedy was diagnosed with a brain tumor, I suggested that the president might at least consider awarding Kennedy the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Marc objected wtih the genteel diplomacy he was known for. “ That ’ s crazy! ” he thundered. K ennedy wa s a liberal, he noted (of which I was well aware). Edited September 29, 2009 by Athomeboy_2000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:18 AM) Bush White House Denies J.K. Rowling and Ted Kennedy Presidential Medal of Freedom This guy (Latimer) is a f***tard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:45 AM) This guy (Latimer) is a f***tard. Sounds like this Thiessen guy is too. But whatever, these medals are at Presidential discretion, so they can do what they want to. Its a shame that BushCo had such a narrow and uneducated world view, but not really surprising, and not really anything we should care about too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:45 AM) This guy (Latimer) is a f***tard. so he learned from his boss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:51 AM) so he learned from his boss. The point here is he's making s*** up to sell books. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:52 AM) The point here is he's making s*** up to sell books. Sell books? Yes. Making s*** up? Unknown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Clearly we should only trust Bush and Cheney to tell the truth about their presidencies. Anyone else is clearly lying. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 10:03 AM) Clearly we should only trust Bush and Cheney to tell the truth about their presidencies. Anyone else is clearly lying. The money in Washington (aka the media) is to make Bush look stupid, you all saying stuff like this is proof of it. You people hate the guy so much that you just lap this s*** up that AHB posted as "more proof" that the guy was "stupid" or whatever else. Clearly, everything that comes out about the administration being either wrong, stubborn, stupid, or ignorant are trustworthy. It's a pretty clear fact that Bush had respect for Kennedy even though they may not have agreed on everything. I'll leave it at that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 considering the people Bush gave presidential medal's to, this would fit the bill. They wouldn't give one to Kennedy because he actually accomplished things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 10:15 AM) The money in Washington (aka the media) is to make Bush look stupid, you all saying stuff like this is proof of it. You people hate the guy so much that you just lap this s*** up that AHB posted as "more proof" that the guy was "stupid" or whatever else. Clearly, everything that comes out about the administration being either wrong, stubborn, stupid, or ignorant are trustworthy. It's a pretty clear fact that Bush had respect for Kennedy even though they may not have agreed on everything. I'll leave it at that. B.S. One, "the money" in media is to make anyone they can look stupid. Two, "you all saying stuff like this is proof" of what? I don't recall getting a check for bashing Bush, and I didn't say he was stupid either. Three, no one is "lapping" this s*** up, if you look at what I posted, I said UNKNOWN. Who got medals is known, and reflects the narrow minded view I described, but we don't know if his speech writers or advisors said these things. But, my GUESS is that, if you are a speech writer for ANY President, you could publish so much s*** that is true that would sell like hotcakes, why would you bother lying? It only increases the risk that you undermine your own efforts, so why do that? I'd lean towards the idea that most of what someone like this says is true, if out of context. But I don't know for sure, and neither do you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:18 AM) Bush White House Denies J.K. Rowling and Ted Kennedy Presidential Medal of Freedom But you have to watch was is said in the media... You never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Every book critical of the Bush administration must be a made-up money grab. Its impossible to consider that they really were as incompetent as all of these ex-officials say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 10:55 AM) Every book critical of the Bush administration must be a made-up money grab. Its impossible to consider that they really were as incompetent as all of these ex-officials say. All hyperbole aside, I think the best view into that administration you can get, for better or worse, are the Bob Woodward books. He was well-respected and given all sorts of access by BushCo (at least for the first couple books), he's a not a liberal agenda guy, and he did an awful lot of homework. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 No. Its impossible to consider that they really were as incompetent as Woodward's books portrayed. He was just lying for money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 11:33 AM) Two, "you all saying stuff like this is proof" of what? I don't recall getting a check for bashing Bush, and I didn't say he was stupid either. That's why you didn't get your check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 Woodward has been an awful journalist for a decade, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 11:17 AM) Woodward has been an awful journalist for a decade, however. I fully disagree, based on his books and the few articles I have read, but I admit I have not read a ton of his paper stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 29, 2009 Share Posted September 29, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2009 -> 09:24 AM) I fully disagree, based on his books and the few articles I have read, but I admit I have not read a ton of his paper stuff. Woodward's problem is that he has become the prime example of a "Villager". He's no longer interested in getting beyond the story that people are willing to tell him and pissing people off in the process...he's traded away that behavior in exchange for access. There's not necessarily anything wrong with being a high level stenographer, those people should exist and do serve a purpose. And Woodward gets some interesting stuff when there is legitimate conflict occurring between the people he's interviewing, But there's just way too many of them today who aren't trying to get beyond what they're told. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts