lostfan Posted October 17, 2009 Share Posted October 17, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Oct 17, 2009 -> 05:12 PM) It is a big deal, but they can go get someone else. There's the subtle difference. Still doesn't mean this guy shouldn't be punched in the face on GP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Oct 17, 2009 -> 04:12 PM) It is a big deal, but they can go get someone else. There's the subtle difference. They actually did go to someone else. And the ironic part of this is that half of all marriages end in divorce. If he wanted to save kids from traumatic upbrinings, he shouldn't issue any marriage licenses at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Oct 17, 2009 -> 07:49 PM) They actually did go to someone else. And the ironic part of this is that half of all marriages end in divorce. If he wanted to save kids from traumatic upbrinings, he shouldn't issue any marriage licenses at all. And the judges justifications for this and his defenses of himself are the best part of it. "I have piles and piles of black friends. They come to my home, I marry them, they use my bathroom. I treat them just like everyone else." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 This judge must work for comedians...he's giving them tons of ammo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Oct 17, 2009 -> 02:00 PM) ^ no kidding. I'm pretty sure you've all heard about the judge in LA who's stuck in the 1930's? See how crazy some people are in this country: http://www.conservativeunderground.com/for...ead.php?t=20544 A particularly good one. He actually lets black people use his bathroom. Why didn't HE get the Nobel prize? anyways, this judge is crazy. Edited October 18, 2009 by mr_genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 He's not a judge, but a justice of the peace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 Link The unprecedented number of death threats against President Obama, a rise in racist hate groups, and a new wave of antigovernment fervor threaten to overwhelm the US Secret Service, according to government officials and reports, raising new questions about the 144-year-old agency’s overall mission. The Secret Service is tracking a far broader range of possible threats to the nation’s leaders, the officials said, even as it also investigates financial crimes such as counterfeiting as part of its original mandate. The new demands are leading some officials, both inside and outside the agency, to raise the possibility of the service curtailing or dropping its role in fighting financial crime to focus more on protecting leaders and their families from assassination attempts and thwarting terrorist plots aimed at high-profile events. “If there were an evaluation of the service’s two missions, it might be determined that it is ineffective . . . to conduct its protection mission and investigate financial crimes,’’ according to a inter nal report issued in August by the Congressional Research Service. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 There are plenty of nutjobs out there making it perfectly clear that they would embrace an armed revolution to overthrow a legitimately elected President who has broken no laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 18, 2009 Share Posted October 18, 2009 well as long as they have faith in god. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 18, 2009 -> 05:43 PM) well as long as they have faith in god. Yay for the religious right jihadists of America! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted October 19, 2009 Share Posted October 19, 2009 President Obama popped in on third and fourth-graders at a Silver Spring, Md. elementary school Monday, to tout the benefits of reading for youngsters, just as they were having lunch. [...] In his brief remarks to the students, Mr. Obama said “I have heard great things about your school and everybody here is reading all the time.” Nooooooooooooo! Countdown to Malkin publishing the names, photos and street addresses of the principal and teachers, in 5... 4... 3... Hat tip to Bob Cesca Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 finally got a chance to look at all the daily show clips in here. They were f***ing hysterical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 People actually listen to this douchebag. Glenn Beck: Volunteering = COMMUNISM!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Oct 19, 2009 -> 03:22 PM) Hat tip to Bob Cesca Has she done that before, i.e. names addresses etc? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (Cknolls @ Oct 20, 2009 -> 11:16 AM) Has she done that before, i.e. names addresses etc? Maybe not Malkin herself but yes conservative bloggers have done it resulting in harassing phone calls, death threats etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (Cknolls @ Oct 20, 2009 -> 10:16 AM) Has she done that before, i.e. names addresses etc? Yes she has Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 The latest faux outrage is from the "revelations" that the Obama campaign was "controlling the media." If they bother to read what was said they'd see that the strategy was mostly to bypass it altogether, if possible, because they actually saw the media as a liability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 because Reagan didn´t try to control the media... sorry Ronaldus Magnos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 Well Compiled: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Oct 20, 2009 -> 04:15 PM) Well Compiled: Unfortunately, with the guy from Media Matters going on Olbermann...that just gives more ammunition to Fox News since Olbermann is unabashedly Democratic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 most of those clips weren't from olbermann opinion shows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 20, 2009 -> 05:02 PM) most of those clips weren't from olbermann opinion shows. None of them were, except for the interview at the end. And the entire thing was put together by Media Matters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 I guess I don't understand. They compiled fox news clips of them making s*** up. Fox is completely on the defensive right now, it will harden their base but this whole thing will probably not be good for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Oct 20, 2009 -> 05:53 PM) I guess I don't understand. They compiled fox news clips of them making s*** up. Fox is completely on the defensive right now, it will harden their base but this whole thing will probably not be good for them. I disagree - I think Obama going after Fox is politically stupid. If you want to convey the idea that Fox is a partisan non-journalistic news network (which... duh), then you treat it as such - ignore them, maybe laugh at them a little bit when the opportunity presents itself, and just go on doing your job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted October 20, 2009 Share Posted October 20, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 21, 2009 -> 12:32 AM) I disagree - I think Obama going after Fox is politically stupid. If you want to convey the idea that Fox is a partisan non-journalistic news network (which... duh), then you treat it as such - ignore them, maybe laugh at them a little bit when the opportunity presents itself, and just go on doing your job. This isn't hurting them at all. The vast majority aren't paying attention/don't care, and Fox, for the first time I've seen has to defend itself and is damn near acknowledging slant. Politically this at worst does nothing to Obama and at best gives cover to other news networks not to cover dumb f***ing stories like czars and tea partiers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts