bmags Posted June 12, 2010 Share Posted June 12, 2010 I think what's more remarkable is that we could hold our country responsible for our actions and want them not to make stupid rhetorical flourishes that hinder our interests abroad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 good news from the IL-D Senate Candidate http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/2010/06...e-benefits.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted June 15, 2010 Share Posted June 15, 2010 http://carlyfailorina.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted June 16, 2010 Author Share Posted June 16, 2010 Republican Senate nominee and Harry Reid's crazy opponent. (Tea Party Approved) You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. And in fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying my goodness what can we do to turn this country around? I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 QUOTE (Rex Kicka** @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 03:04 PM) Republican Senate nominee and Harry Reid's crazy opponent. (Tea Party Approved) LOL Started off OK with the first sentence, then got weird, then just went off the deep end, and ended it all with a threat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 Isn't Sue Lowden the one who said we could trade chickens for check ups? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 (edited) Edit: that was sharron angle, who beat sue lowden. double edit: THE QUOTE WAS ANGLE Edited June 16, 2010 by bmags Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 Reid was looking at the very real possibility of losing his seat, but now that his opponent is a crazy person, he'll probably stay in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 16, 2010 Share Posted June 16, 2010 Y'all loves you some context, don't you? Kill Harry Reid! TAKE HIM OUT! Yea, literally! Seriously? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 Kap, please stop white-knighting terrible companies and crazy politicians. This lady is crazy and has crazy ideas, especially when put into context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 I hope she wins. I really do. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/20..._reid-1517.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 07:15 PM) Kap, please stop white-knighting terrible companies and crazy politicians. This lady is crazy and has crazy ideas, especially when put into context. TAKE OUT HARRY REID! I'm soooooooo supportive of BP and crazy lady. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted June 17, 2010 Author Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 07:42 PM) Y'all loves you some context, don't you? Kill Harry Reid! TAKE HIM OUT! Yea, literally! Seriously? You're right context is key. Maybe it would be wise to use a different euphemism for electoral defeat in the context of discussing the justifications for armed American insurrection. Just sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (Rex Kicka** @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 07:49 PM) You're right context is key. Maybe it would be wise to use a different euphemism for electoral defeat in the context of discussing the justifications for armed American insurrection. Just sayin'. Um hmm. Keep painting her as a nutso fanatical b****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 08:36 PM) Um hmm. Keep painting her as a nutso fanatical b****. QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 07:15 PM) Kap, please stop white-knighting terrible companies and crazy politicians. This lady is crazy and has crazy ideas, especially when put into context. She does a fine job painting herself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonWeltall Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (Rex Kicka** @ Jun 17, 2010 -> 12:49 AM) You're right context is key. Maybe it would be wise to use a different euphemism for electoral defeat in the context of discussing the justifications for armed American insurrection. Just sayin'. Kap is correct. She's just saying that it's vital that Harry Reid be defeated in the election. If he is re-elected, THEN we'll be forced to rise up and murder him. Voting for her is the only way to save Reid's life. It's really a very compassionate statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Jun 17, 2010 -> 02:43 AM) Kap is correct. She's just saying that it's vital that Harry Reid be defeated in the election. If he is re-elected, THEN we'll be forced to rise up and murder him. Voting for her is the only way to save Reid's life. It's really a very compassionate statement. thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 08:43 PM) Kap is correct. She's just saying that it's vital that Harry Reid be defeated in the election. If he is re-elected, THEN we'll be forced to rise up and murder him. Voting for her is the only way to save Reid's life. It's really a very compassionate statement. Hell, I didn't even think of that. Good point! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 09:43 PM) Kap is correct. She's just saying that it's vital that Harry Reid be defeated in the election. If he is re-elected, THEN we'll be forced to rise up and murder him. Voting for her is the only way to save Reid's life. It's really a very compassionate statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jun 16, 2010 -> 06:42 PM) Y'all loves you some context, don't you? Kill Harry Reid! TAKE HIM OUT! Yea, literally! Seriously? Context? The quote, with multiple sentences that led up to that line, was posted right above your post. Did you not read it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 You can't ever criticize a conservative for being racist, bigoted, stupid or crazy, or kap will flip out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 Anyone in this thread: "Republican has affair with staffer" Kap response: "Oh sure I'm just a racist adulteror out to molest your kids!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted June 17, 2010 Author Share Posted June 17, 2010 Alexi Giannulios and Harry Reid have to have done wonderful things in their past life to deserve these opponents. Sharon Angle is crazy and Mark Kirk lied about his military service AND his 18 month teaching career. Turns out he taught middle school for a year in London and did work-study student teaching at Cornell for a nursery school. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/17/us/polit...rss&emc=rss In a speech on the House floor on Sept. 19, 2006, as he talked about school safety, Mr. Kirk spoke about “the kids who were the brightest lights of our country’s future, and I also remember those who bore scrutiny as people who might bring a gun to class.” Mr. Kirk declined an interview on Wednesday to talk about his time as a teacher. His spokeswoman said the congressman was referring to nursery school students in Ithaca, not his students in London, during that speech on the House floor in 2006. “Congressman Kirk’s formative experiences in the classroom stayed with him,” Ms. Kukowski said in a statement. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted June 17, 2010 Share Posted June 17, 2010 he could tell who was going to kill at the nursery school? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 18, 2010 Share Posted June 18, 2010 More Sharon Angle. When Reid is re-elected easily in November, the Dems should thank the Tea Party. This candidate they put up there is drowning, she's apparently incapable of a coherent thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts