Rex Kickass Posted December 13, 2010 Author Share Posted December 13, 2010 Your new House Chairman of the Financial Services Committee, Congressman Spencer Bachus - Alabama In Washington, the view is that the banks are to be regulated, and my view is that Washington and the regulators are there to serve the banks. http://blog.al.com/sweethome/2010/12/spenc...ly_gets_hi.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 13, 2010 -> 10:04 AM) He then reiterated that the key is finding a common ground on issues. I.e., compromising Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 13, 2010 -> 01:30 PM) I.e., compromising I think there's a difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 13, 2010 -> 03:06 PM) I think there's a difference. I agree there is a difference. However, I really think Boehner here was trying to play to both sides - saying he wants to find a middle ground, but also won't budge much. It will be interesting to see how things actually play out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 13, 2010 Share Posted December 13, 2010 You want to be seriously impressed? This one took some cojones. A 3:30 minute rant on Fox and Friends about how evil it is of the U.S. Senate to leave the thousands of 9/11 responders hung out to dry on that health care bill. 3:30 of a patriotic rant...without noting a single time that all of the 42 votes against it were Republicans and all 57 in favor were Democrats. The entire time, just stating "The U.S. Senate" or "The Congress". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Boehner needs to take notes on how Newt Gingrich went down in flames and ended up punching himself out before he starts trying to sound like he's not going to stop until he has everything his way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (lostfan @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 12:37 AM) Boehner needs to take notes on how Newt Gingrich went down in flames and ended up punching himself out before he starts trying to sound like he's not going to stop until he has everything his way. Basically, don't cheat on your wife while impeaching the President for doing the same? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 07:58 AM) Basically, don't cheat on your wife while impeaching the President for doing the same? Yeah, who remembers he committed perjury? Who needs a President that is trustworthy, ethical and honest? Totally the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 09:38 AM) Yeah, who remembers he committed perjury? Who needs a President that is trustworthy, ethical and honest? Totally the same. Dude, Gingrich resigned because of the affair, plain and simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 08:40 AM) Dude, Gingrich resigned because of the affair, plain and simple. As s***ty as adultery is, committing perjury, while President of the United States, is worse. By a long shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 09:42 AM) As s***ty as adultery is, committing perjury, while President of the United States, is worse. By a long shot. And that's not why Newt Gingrich resigned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 08:43 AM) And that's not why Newt Gingrich resigned. Exactly. You're trying to compare the two when they're not comparable. Clinton got in trouble because he lied, not because he enjoyed a fine cigar with the company of women. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 09:57 AM) Exactly. You're trying to compare the two when they're not comparable. Clinton got in trouble because he lied, not because he enjoyed a fine cigar with the company of women. I don't believe I compared the two. I believe the original comparison was Boehner and Gingrich. Gingrich resigned because he cheated on his wife while impeaching a President in a case built on Clinton cheating on his wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 08:57 AM) Exactly. You're trying to compare the two when they're not comparable. Clinton got in trouble because he lied, not because he enjoyed a fine cigar with the company of women. The whole concept of him having to testify for something so meaningless was a joke. Who the f*** cares if he cheated on his wife? How does that affect anything whatsoever? I'd say a large portion of people in all 3 branches of government have been unfaithful to their spouses. Should we have all of them testify? What a farce. Edited December 14, 2010 by BigSqwert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 Oh great, now we're going to relitigate the impeachment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 08:58 AM) I don't believe I compared the two. I believe the original comparison was Boehner and Gingrich. Gingrich resigned because he cheated on his wife while impeaching a President in a case built on Clinton cheating on his wife. I thought your point was that he shouldn't be like Newt, pointing the finger at Clinton for doing the same thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 08:59 AM) The whole concept of him having to testify for something so meaningless was a joke. Who the f*** cares if he cheated on his wife? How does that affect anything whatsoever? I'd say a large portion of people in all 3 branches of government have been unfaithful to their spouses. Should we have all of them testify? What a farce. I agree 100%, but he did, and he lied, which made it all worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 We have serious problems in this country I hope we can stick to addressing them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 QUOTE (lostfan @ Dec 13, 2010 -> 11:37 PM) Boehner needs to take notes on how Newt Gingrich went down in flames and ended up punching himself out before he starts trying to sound like he's not going to stop until he has everything his way. Gingrich actually managed to work with a Dem White House and get some things done, before he imploded. Right now, that would be a victory, if Boehner could do the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted December 14, 2010 Share Posted December 14, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 09:12 AM) Right now, that would be a victory, if Boehner could do the same. he must also do so without crying like a baby. i will not compromise on this. Edited December 14, 2010 by mr_genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 09:12 AM) Gingrich actually managed to work with a Dem White House and get some things done, before he imploded. Right now, that would be a victory, if Boehner could do the same. Boehner is a f***ing hack jackass. Yea, I said it. He'll be thrown out on his ass in two years and Ms. Pelosi will ride right back into power on the heels of her f***ing hack jackass president. The whole damn group of them are asshatery at its finest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 I was talking about Gingrich's government shutdowns, where he tried to punk Clinton and ended up getting mushroom stamped. He lost his leadership position before the other s*** because he was ineffective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 QUOTE (lostfan @ Dec 14, 2010 -> 09:46 PM) I was talking about Gingrich's government shutdowns, where he tried to punk Clinton and ended up getting mushroom stamped. He lost his leadership position before the other s*** because he was ineffective. ? He didn't lose his leadership position until the affair came out during the impeachment December. It then quickly went to Livingston, I presume, who also immediately lost it because he was cheating on his wife. It then went to Tom Delay's handpicked guy, Hastert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted December 15, 2010 Author Share Posted December 15, 2010 Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, suggests that the Senate should come back to work after Christmas and work til Jan 4, the last actual day of the lame duck session, since there are so many things still on the agenda (because none of them can get 60 votes until millionaires get their tax cut). Here's Republican Senator from Arizona, Jon Kyl. It is impossible to do all of the things that the majority leader laid out, frankly, without disrespecting the institution and without disrespecting one of the two holiest of holidays for Christians and the families of all of the Senate, not just the senators themselves but all of the staff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted December 15, 2010 Share Posted December 15, 2010 (edited) I don't know if this is the right spot to put this, but I don't want to get flamed in that other thread. George W. Bush's book is a trainwreck. I try to read Presidential memoirs or what have you when they come out, but I've never read such a simple book. Seriously, these are the least complex sentences of all-time. If he even had a hand in writing this, it makes me truly sad. It's like a junior high school kid wrote it and used a thesaurus to replace some words. Also, I could punch him for the Stem Cell chapter and his reasoning behind decisions based on that. Edited December 15, 2010 by Steve9347 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts