NorthSideSox72 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Sources now saying that John Edwards asked his staffer to claim paternity of the child of his mistress, then Edwards dropped the aide "like a hot potato". Classy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 22, 2009 -> 10:43 AM) Sources now saying that John Edwards asked his staffer to claim paternity of the child of his mistress, then Edwards dropped the aide "like a hot potato". Classy. That's not a big surprise for me. The guy has zero morals and decency. He is the left wing equivalent of a Sanford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Naw he's way worse than Sanford, Ensign and him are more comparable, but Edwards is even scummier with his kid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Sep 22, 2009 -> 02:22 PM) Naw he's way worse than Sanford, Ensign and him are more comparable, but Edwards is even scummier with his kid. I have to agree, trying to pawn your child off on someone and dropping them like garbage is incredibly low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Yeah Sanford's story was just bizarre which is what made it interesting, but Edwards's situation just makes him look like such a lowlife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 Tex, this one's for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted September 22, 2009 Share Posted September 22, 2009 I had never watched DWTS until last night. Seriously, they were trying to make him look like a pathetic piece of s***, yet, technically he danced the parts better then most of the others. I now know why I didn't want to downgrade my cable - we resort to watching s*** tv like DWTS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 22, 2009 -> 03:16 PM) Tex, this one's for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (bmags @ Sep 22, 2009 -> 02:22 PM) Naw he's way worse than Sanford, Ensign and him are more comparable, but Edwards is even scummier with his kid. I was thinking more or less, the same thing about his wife... What kind of piece of s*** puts puts his cancer ridden wife as the centerpiece of his campaign, and then sleeps around on her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Sep 22, 2009 -> 05:15 PM) I had never watched DWTS until last night. Seriously, they were trying to make him look like a pathetic piece of s***, yet, technically he danced the parts better then most of the others. I now know why I didn't want to downgrade my cable - we resort to watching s*** tv like DWTS. Honestly the only reasons I have cable are sports and the history channels. Other than that, I'd rather play playstation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 22, 2009 -> 10:56 PM) Honestly the only reasons I have cable are sports and the history channels. Other than that, I'd rather play playstation. And our playstation is sitting here collecting dust. It's really the hassle of getting it all out - the kids wear me out by 9:00 and all I feel like doing is either reading, playing on the message boards, or watching movies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 INTERNET WARNING!! If you get an e-mail titled "Nude Photo of Nancy Pelosi," Don't open it... It contains a nude photo of Nancy Pelosi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 12:29 AM) INTERNET WARNING!! If you get an e-mail titled "Nude Photo of Nancy Pelosi," Don't open it... It contains a nude photo of Nancy Pelosi. The one time you hope for a virus... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.htm...1#ixzz0RvymRqSs Wonder if they will be the only ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (Cknolls @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 09:22 AM) http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.htm...1#ixzz0RvymRqSs Wonder if they will be the only ones? Well the US won't join them, I'd bet on that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 10:26 AM) Well the US won't join them, I'd bet on that. How do you figure that? The US boycotted the UN anti-racism forum for basically the same reason and a bunch of European countries walked out when Ahmadinejad started his usual anti-Semitic rants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (lostfan @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 09:28 AM) How do you figure that? The US boycotted the UN anti-racism forum for basically the same reason and a bunch of European countries walked out when Ahmadinejad started his usual anti-Semitic rants. Call it a hunch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 The precedent says otherwise though. There is some perception that this administration is anti-Israel but all they've done is some mild half-assed arm twisting on a far right Israeli government because they aren't really serious about the peace process. Other than that they follow the same protocols every other administration does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cknolls Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (lostfan @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 09:28 AM) How do you figure that? The US boycotted the UN anti-racism forum for basically the same reason and a bunch of European countries walked out when Ahmadinejad started his usual anti-Semitic rants. Well, Obama will be in attendance, right. And I do not believe he has the balls to walk out on A-JAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (Cknolls @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 10:37 AM) Well, Obama will be in attendance, right. And I do not believe he has the balls to walk out on A-JAD. Yeah, that he probably wouldn't do. His delegates would but he wouldn't do it himself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (lostfan @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 09:34 AM) The precedent says otherwise though. There is some perception that this administration is anti-Israel but all they've done is some mild half-assed arm twisting on a far right Israeli government because they aren't really serious about the peace process. Other than that they follow the same protocols every other administration does. They seem to be set on "talking" to Iran. If there is any kind of a walkout, it pretty much cinches that it won't happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 08:48 AM) They seem to be set on "talking" to Iran. If there is any kind of a walkout, it pretty much cinches that it won't happen. The "Being a d**che just because" foreign policy was tried for the last 8 years. Really didn't get us anywhere. Canada...etc., no one cares if they make a protest. We ought to encourage them to do so. Hell, more countries ought to do so. Just not the ones who actually need to do the heavy lifting; you undermine your own case if with that policy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 10:58 AM) The "Being a d**che just because" foreign policy was tried for the last 8 years. Really didn't get us anywhere. Canada...etc., no one cares if they make a protest. We ought to encourage them to do so. Hell, more countries ought to do so. Just not the ones who actually need to do the heavy lifting; you undermine your own case if with that policy. Calling for the extinction of a race of people shouldn't get you an audience with the United States, and neither should a rogue nuclear program. That is the kind of thing that shouldn't be rewarded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Sep 23, 2009 -> 09:06 AM) Calling for the extinction of a race of people shouldn't get you an audience with the United States, and neither should a rogue nuclear program. That is the kind of thing that shouldn't be rewarded. So we should just stand by, turn up our noses, and let both happen? Negotiations are not a reward. Negotiations are something 2 countries who have diverging interests undertake to try to find ways to agree to benefit both. We didn't reward the Soviets by negotiating with them. We didn't reward the Libyans by negotiating with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 23, 2009 Share Posted September 23, 2009 Not negotiating isn't going to do anything to stop their nuclear program either. That's the equivalent of burying your head in the sand/plugging your ears and going "la-la-la-la" and pretending nothing is happening. I can understand the principle but not the reality. It won't do anything, not even delay it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts