bigruss Posted August 26, 2010 Share Posted August 26, 2010 What is it about then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 07:28 PM) IT IS NOT ABOUT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. Holy s***, does that get it through your head? Yeah yeah yeah. Kap you realize I read like several dozen websites right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 ITS NOT ABOUT RELIGION ITS ABOUT MUSLIMS BEING INSENSITIVE BY WANTING TO PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION! Kap, if it isn't about religion, you need to provide a reason for the rapid opposition to Muslims building a "Ground Zero Mosque" that is at least plausible. And, even if you manage to do that, you're still just using an outliar. The overwhelming majority of the opposition to this comes because they're Muslim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonWeltall Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 01:04 AM) ITS NOT ABOUT RELIGION ITS ABOUT MUSLIMS BEING INSENSITIVE BY WANTING TO PRACTICE THEIR RELIGION! Kap, if it isn't about religion, you need to provide a reason for the rapid opposition to Muslims building a "Ground Zero Mosque" that is at least plausible. And, even if you manage to do that, you're still just using an outliar. The overwhelming majority of the opposition to this comes because they're Muslim. ALL of the opposition is because they're Muslim. And there is significant opposition actually *trying to stop them*. These aren't just crowds of people protesting "hey, building that is rude!". They're trying to screw them with zoning laws, or get the building (and nothing else in the area) declared a historical landmark so no one can build there, or get Congress to investigate the people building it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (lostfan @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 05:29 PM) I see "Tea Party" and I really just think "Republican" Fair enough, because when I see "Progressive" I really think just another liberal who is too ashamed to call himself a liberal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (CrimsonWeltall @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 07:23 PM) ALL of the opposition is because they're Muslim. And there is significant opposition actually *trying to stop them*. These aren't just crowds of people protesting "hey, building that is rude!". They're trying to screw them with zoning laws, or get the building (and nothing else in the area) declared a historical landmark so no one can build there, or get Congress to investigate the people building it. So, if this mosque was going up 12 blocks away from the get go, you are saying that there would still be this massive opposition to it? I will grant you that there will always be some opposition to it, but you can't say it would be on the same level it is now. Hell, they could have diffused this thing right from the start, made HUGE PR points to their side and almost neutered the opposition if right away they said something like " You know, our intentions were pure in trying to build this center here, to build bridges and heal the divide. but however pure the motives are, it is clear that choosing this site has had the opposite effect, and in the interest of fostering peace and understanding, we are beginning our search for a new site immediately." But no, they just did their heels in and get indignant at our indignation, as if they are the only ones that are allowed to be upset at anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 09:17 PM) Fair enough, because when I see "Progressive" I really think just another liberal who is too ashamed to call himself a liberal. That's pretty much true, but it's not so much "shame" as it is that "liberal" had become a dirty word (and still is, really) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KipWellsFan Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 08:17 PM) Fair enough, because when I see "Progressive" I really think just another liberal who is too ashamed to call himself a liberal. I'm a liberal and damn proud of it. And I don't give two s***s what a bunch of goof-offs think it means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 08:22 PM) So, if this mosque was going up 12 blocks away from the get go, you are saying that there would still be this massive opposition to it? I will grant you that there will always be some opposition to it, but you can't say it would be on the same level it is now. Hell, they could have diffused this thing right from the start, made HUGE PR points to their side and almost neutered the opposition if right away they said something like " You know, our intentions were pure in trying to build this center here, to build bridges and heal the divide. but however pure the motives are, it is clear that choosing this site has had the opposite effect, and in the interest of fostering peace and understanding, we are beginning our search for a new site immediately." But no, they just did their heels in and get indignant at our indignation, as if they are the only ones that are allowed to be upset at anything. Hey, yeah, they could have avoid the whole controversy if they would have caved in right away! Alternatively, Americans could realize 9/11 =! all muslims and that there's nothing wrong with building a community center with a mosque a few blocks away. But no, they had to go all crazy and let their irrational fears of all things muslim become national storylines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 07:00 AM) Hey, yeah, they could have avoid the whole controversy if they would have caved in right away! Alternatively, Americans could realize 9/11 =! all muslims and that there's nothing wrong with building a community center with a mosque a few blocks away. But no, they had to go all crazy and let their irrational fears of all things muslim become national storylines. One of the really amazing things about this story, to me, is that before it became national news, the local people in the area (who are the ones that really matter here anyway) were generally in favor of it. Early meetings with boards and what not were positive. Now you have the rest of the country weighing in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 26, 2010 -> 09:22 PM) So, if this mosque was going up 12 blocks away from the get go, you are saying that there would still be this massive opposition to it? If it were 8000 blocks away, there'd still be opposition. I'm in one of the states where we're getting the same exact protests over building of a new Mosque. They're vandalizing mosques and protesting mosques in Orange county and organizing Qu'ran burnings in Florida, for crying out loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Exactly. Tennessee still isn't far enough away. Those poll results show close to 20% don't want any mosque built anywhere in the country. And, of course, this whole thing was pretty much a non-issue until Republicans made it a vote-getting tool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 (edited) I guess all liberals are violent, 1st amendment right disrupters. Death threats Edit: and a shooting Edited August 27, 2010 by Jenksismybitch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 10:56 AM) I guess all liberals are violent, 1st amendment right disrupters. Death threats Edit: and a shooting Damn Commies!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 10:56 AM) I guess all liberals are violent, 1st amendment right disrupters. Death threats Edit: and a shooting Don't forget firebombers. It was a Carnahan staffer that firebombed his office, not a 'evil Tea Bagger' like att the lefty rags in St. Louis said it was. http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/...on_campaign.php Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted August 27, 2010 Author Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 01:04 PM) Don't forget firebombers. It was a Carnahan staffer that firebombed his office, not a 'evil Tea Bagger' like att the lefty rags in St. Louis said it was. http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com/dailyrft/...on_campaign.php From your link. Correction: This story originally indicated that Carnahan confirmed the firebombing suspect worked for his campaign. That's not accurate. Carnahan confirmed that Powers once worked for his campaign but did not confirm that he was actually a police subject in the case. Being interviewed doesn't make you a suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Details, details. Former campaign staffer being interviewed is pretty much the same thing as "campaign staffer bombed office". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Rex Kicka** @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 12:18 PM) From your link. Being interviewed doesn't make you a suspect. I'll get you other links when I get home from work. He IS the suspect atm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 02:34 PM) I'll get you other links when I get home from work. He IS the suspect atm. His attorney has confirmed he is a suspect, but no arrests or charges have been made yet in that case. I seriously hadn't heard of the incident at his office at all until you guys posted about it, and I usually follow these pretty closely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted August 27, 2010 Author Share Posted August 27, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 02:34 PM) I'll get you other links when I get home from work. He IS the suspect atm. I'll take your word for it. Just thought it was odd that the story immediately backpedaled on calling him a suspect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted August 27, 2010 Share Posted August 27, 2010 Reading the comments, the story original assumed he was a tea-party member or at least "fit the profile". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 04:01 PM) Reading the comments, the story original assumed he was a tea-party member or at least "fit the profile". damn you tea party! shakes fist in air Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted August 28, 2010 Share Posted August 28, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (Rex Kicka** @ Aug 27, 2010 -> 04:00 PM) I'll take your word for it. Just thought it was odd that the story immediately backpedaled on calling him a suspect. don't take his word for it!! he's one of them. a tea party! *shakes fist in air* Edited August 28, 2010 by mr_genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilMonkey Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/24504...ends-daniel-fos Congresswoman Violated Nepotism Rules, Funneled Thousands to Family and Friends August 29, 2010 3:01 A.M. By Daniel Foster Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D., Texas), a long-serving congresswoman from Dallas, improperly awarded thousands of dollars in college scholarships from the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, violating nepotism and ethics rules by giving the funds to multiple relatives and the children of top aide Rod Givens. Johnson also violated a rule that required scholarship winners to live or attend school in the awarding member’s district. More at the link. I wonder if the CBC will cry racism on this one as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted August 29, 2010 Share Posted August 29, 2010 QUOTE (Alpha Dog @ Aug 29, 2010 -> 04:54 PM) I wonder if the CBC will cry racism on this one as well. It really is remarkable how many members of the CBC are going down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts