knightni Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Haha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Man... this guy is so good he can pitch with both arms!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 game thread also has this put up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 Bizarre, but it might be a good omen. Are we superstitious? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 It's even funnier with the picture they are using. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 QUOTE (Brian @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 03:31 PM) It's even funnier with the picture they are using. I get a strange feeling of deja vu... didn't they do this with Danks a while back? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted September 20, 2008 Author Share Posted September 20, 2008 QUOTE (lostfan @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 03:36 PM) I get a strange feeling of deja vu... didn't they do this with Danks a while back? They used a pic of Sisco for him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 What in the f*** White Sox.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 And it's still up, and it's been at least 2 hours since this thread started. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 (edited) Not that its huge deal but someone should be fired for something like that.I mean cmon its not that hard to get a thing like that right. Edited September 20, 2008 by shipps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 They fixed it. Now it just says "Floyd looks to follow..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 QUOTE (shipps @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 05:02 PM) Not that its huge deal but someone should be fired for something like that.I mean cmon its not that hard to get a thing like that right. Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maggsmaggs Posted September 20, 2008 Share Posted September 20, 2008 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 04:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? yeah that's where you just tell the person, don't be such a moron. You get fired for much worse stuff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 01:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? If it were in print, possibly. A headline misprint is a pretty big boner. Thousands of dollars and lots of time to stop the presses and rerun. An agency I worked for in River North a while back almost lost an account over a reprint gaffe. A webpage, highly unlikely—it's a 30-second code fix. Embarrassing, maybe. Terminable, not on the first time at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 04:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? Like I said, its not a huge deal but cmon.If they did it from lack of knowledge of the team they should not be working for the site.If it was just a brainfart than no they shouldnt even get in trouble for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 03:53 PM) Someone should be fired for a mistake as simple and harmless as that? Considering our conversation the other night and your hangup on proper grammar and spelling, this is hilarious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (shipps @ Sep 20, 2008 -> 04:02 PM) Not that its huge deal but someone should be fired for something like that.I mean cmon its not that hard to get a thing like that right. You obviously haven't met the internet people for teams before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 Do the Sox run that site exclusively or does MLB have a hand in it? All team sites are essentially the same so I wonder what control each team has. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 (edited) QUOTE (G&T @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 10:28 AM) Do the Sox run that site exclusively or does MLB have a hand in it? All team sites are essentially the same so I wonder what control each team has. I know the content is run by a combination of the team's web, marketing, and PR departments (or at least, that's how it is for the NBA; I'd imagine its similar for the MLB). Not sure about the design though. Edited September 21, 2008 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (Felix @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 10:33 AM) I know the content is run by a combination of the team's web, marketing, and PR departments (or at least, that's how it is for the NBA; I'd imagine its similar for the MLB). Not sure about the design though. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 11:21 AM) Considering our conversation the other night and your hangup on proper grammar and spelling, this is hilarious. I just said it bothers me. I'm not looking to fire anyone over it, ha. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted September 21, 2008 Share Posted September 21, 2008 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Sep 21, 2008 -> 12:03 PM) I just said it bothers me. I'm not looking to fire anyone over it, ha. UR feyrd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.