Jump to content

$700 Billion Bailout


HuskyCaucasian

Recommended Posts

"This bill would not have been agreed to had it not been for John McCain... This is a bipartisan accomplishment, a bipartisan success. And if people want to get something done in Washington, they just watch John McCain. He's been the guy whose name is at the top of major pieces of legislation for a long time."

-- Mitt Romney, NBC's Today show, 9/29/08

 

 

"What Senator McCain was able to do was to help bring all of the parties to the table, including the House Republicans, whose votes were needed to pass this"

-- Steve Schmidt, NBC's Meet the Press, 9/28/08

 

 

"We're optimistic that Senator McCain will bring House Republicans on board without driving other parties away, resulting in a successful deal for the American taxpayer."

-- McCain spokeswoman Kimmie Lipscomb, 9/26/08

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 713
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (mr_genius @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 12:44 PM)
so, how much damage does everyone think the markets will take if the government came out and said "no bailout. sorry guys. we're done debating it. "

 

?

I think the current market correction would continue for a while, and the Fed would likely have to continue doing just as it's been doing, lending out capital. It's possible that at some point, the credit market would freeze up more than it has and people genuinely would stop lending, at which point the Fed would step in as it did in the 80's, seize a couple of the banks, and take over as the lender of last resort until the capital markets relaxed. It will be messy, a lot of banks will lose a lot of money, but eventually the bad loans that these banks wrote will be dealt with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 01:05 PM)
So if I have this correct, my choices here are:

 

1. Hope for a bailout, which basically would be a case of socialism to ease economic crisis, or

2. Hope for no bailout, which would cause Wall Street Armageddon.

 

Is death an option here?

There are more than a few very intelligent people who think that the bailout could do more damage than the no-bailout plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 03:08 PM)
There are more than a few very intelligent people who think that the bailout could do more damage than the no-bailout plan.

True. But calling it socialism or some kind of clear disaster is way over the top, IMO.

 

Looking at the latest version, I'd call it 60 to 70% good stuff.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 03:08 PM)
There are more than a few very intelligent people who think that the bailout could do more damage than the no-bailout plan.

As the first one was written, I'd agree. Can't comment on the second one because I don't know the details. It's pretty ugly, though and they have to do something now.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 04:07 PM)
They'll make some changes, hit it for a vote again tomorrow or Wed, and it will get passed this week. I'd bet on it.

 

And looking at the details of the bill, this is not what anyone could reasonably call socialism.

The House Republicans have been screaming socialism on TV though. Although that is to be expected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 01:12 PM)
Sure, and some Dems are screaming that its big business stomping on the little guys. All to be expected.

The amazing thing is...I agree with both the Repubs and the Dems on this one. It is too much like socialized risks for my taste, and it's also big business dumping on the little guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (lostfan @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 02:16 PM)
I hear now that McCain is blaming Obama for not rallying his party.

:lolhitting

 

They both can't win on this one, seriously.

 

The public doesn't want it, both parties are running hard for political cover. It's going to do no good for either guy to finger point at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Sep 29, 2008 -> 03:13 PM)
The amazing thing is...I agree with both the Repubs and the Dems on this one. It is too much like socialized risks for my taste, and it's also big business dumping on the little guys.

It is socialized risk, and it is big business getting away with it. it is also, in its essence, necessary at this point in time. The alternative is worse.

 

The art here is to craft a bill that minimizes those two factors but still acts as the necessary stabilizer. Oh, and, follow on with laws to prevent this sort of mess in the future.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...