Jump to content

Clayton Richard


joejoesox

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (joesaiditstrue @ Oct 2, 2008 -> 05:58 PM)
What an outing by Clayton, in the post-season no less. He had 5 K's in the first 1 2/3 innings that he pitched. Sick

 

Imagine if he had started the game.

 

Tampa got to him the 2nd time around, so I will reserve judgement on what could have been and give him credit for the 1 2/3 innings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (rangercal @ Oct 2, 2008 -> 04:00 PM)
Tampa got to him the 2nd time around, so I will reserve judgement on what could have been and give him credit for the 1 2/3 innings.

 

They swung at the first pitch, that's not really "getting to him", more than changing their approach. I'm not ready to say that Clayton can't make adjustments himself

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's not a starter, but he could be a hell of a guy out of the pen.

 

Seemed like every time he'd start he'd have a solid first 4 innings or so then fall apart. That has bullpen written all over it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Oct 2, 2008 -> 05:04 PM)
He will work as a reliever until he develops that next pitch. He desperately needs that IMO to be anything more than a reliever.

 

He has 4 pitches (fastball, slider, changeup, and curve) and all of them were working well in the minors. He has thrown all of them up here too. In fact, I'm looking at a stats analysis of the September 9th game he had against Toronto.

 

He threw 53 pitches over 4 innings:

- 38 fastballs (24 for strikes)

- 8 changeups (all 8 for strikes)

- 6 sliders (5 for strikes)

- 1 curve (not a strike)

 

I get the feeling he just needs to develop the confidence in the offspeed stuff at the major league level, because they're not bad pitches.

 

If he adds a cutter like Danks did in the offseason and mixes that in with his fastball, changeup, and slider, he could be quite a helpful addition to the staff next year. Like Danks last year, Richard needs an effective pitch to throw to righties. The cutter could be the ticket.

 

Edited by scenario
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we can get another solid inning eater in our rotation next year, I wouldnt mind seeing him in the fifth spot next year. However if that is the plan, I would like to see us take several flyers on pitchers coming off injury or after a down year for insurance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (striker62704 @ Oct 2, 2008 -> 03:32 PM)
If we lose Contreras for 2009 then I would like to see us move Javy, put Richard in at #5 and sign Lowe. He might be in the 3/39 range that Kenny hunts for. I want Javy and Thome both gone. We need consistency.

I don't know if he'd play as well in the Cell...but if we're spending some money, going after one of the better sinkerballers out there isn't a bad option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (striker62704 @ Oct 2, 2008 -> 04:32 PM)
If we lose Contreras for 2009 then I would like to see us move Javy, put Richard in at #5 and sign Lowe. He might be in the 3/39 range that Kenny hunts for. I want Javy and Thome both gone. We need consistency.

Sounds like a plan to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Oct 2, 2008 -> 04:49 PM)
This thread is a joke. Is this the same Richard that sports an era of over 6? He had a couple of nice innings in a game that we were trailing by 3 before eventually remembering he's Clayton Richard and loading the bases before being taken out. If he starts the game we still lose.

 

i think you have a ridiculously selective memory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...