Jump to content

W The Movie comes out today


NorthSideSox72

Will you see W?  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. Where will you watch it, if at all?

    • In the theatres
      10
    • Waiting for DVD
      5
    • Won't see it
      14


Recommended Posts

I know very little about the movie other than seeing the previews. Who is the target audience? Bush-backers? Bush-haters? I still can't comprehend a movie about any president within 5-10 years of leaving office, let alone one still in office. I voted "won't see it" because I know the plot already...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Oct 17, 2008 -> 12:44 PM)
I have absolutely no urge to go see this movie. I've lived through the nightmare that is the last 8 years already, why do I want to review how we got there?

That. Exactly that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oliver stone is in M. Night Shamylan territory, or rather, reverse that. Made too much money early on, too much recognition, that we are forced into his movies getting wide screenings when they are absolutely awful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting note, john Williams on WGN said the movie is NOTHING like the TV teasers you see. The teasers make it out to be almost a mockumentery. But he said the movie is almost sympathetic to Bush.

 

Now I might be more inclined to rent it.

Edited by Athomeboy_2000
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw it yesterday. Here is my review...

 

W was a disappointment on multiple levels. First, the presentation of the non-Bush players - Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rove... were all charicatured and waaaaaaay over the top. Laughably so, but not as a parody - you get the impression that the filmmakers really see them this way. Its ridiculous. In particular, Thandie Newton as Condaleeza Rice was just awful.

 

The portrayal of W was not all bad - it did show some of the key elements, good and bad. But it also put an unnecessarily strong emphasis on stupid falls. For example, they included an extended scene of him choking on a pretzel. It was disconnected from everything else. Why include that? It was just dumb.

 

The best part, probably, was the elder Bush's and their relationship with W. That part was semi-well done, and interesting. And it was the most believable thread in the film.

 

Overall, I give it 1 star out of 4. Mildly entertaining in places, touching in a few, but overall it was just a sad little bashfest that provided little of value to the audience.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 19, 2008 -> 05:06 PM)
Saw it yesterday. Here is my review...

 

W was a disappointment on multiple levels. First, the presentation of the non-Bush players - Rice, Rumsfeld, Powell, Wolfowitz, Cheney, Rove... were all charicatured and waaaaaaay over the top. Laughably so, but not as a parody - you get the impression that the filmmakers really see them this way. Its ridiculous. In particular, Thandie Newton as Condaleeza Rice was just awful.

 

The portrayal of W was not all bad - it did show some of the key elements, good and bad. But it also put an unnecessarily strong emphasis on stupid falls. For example, they included an extended scene of him choking on a pretzel. It was disconnected from everything else. Why include that? It was just dumb.

 

The best part, probably, was the elder Bush's and their relationship with W. That part was semi-well done, and interesting. And it was the most believable thread in the film.

 

Overall, I give it 1 star out of 4. Mildly entertaining in places, touching in a few, but overall it was just a sad little bashfest that provided little of value to the audience.

 

was there a scene where W is flying a jet plane drunk? i thought i read something about that. W's passenger was like "is this the first time you've flown a jet?" and W was like "this is how you learn"

 

 

Edited by mr_genius
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (mr_genius @ Oct 19, 2008 -> 05:52 PM)
was there a scene where W is flying a jet plane drunk? i thought i read something about that. W's passenger was like "is this the first time you've flown a jet?" and W was like "this is how you learn"

Hm, I don't recall a scene like that. Maybe I missed it, but, I don't remember that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 19, 2008 -> 11:06 PM)
Overall, I give it 1 star out of 4. Mildly entertaining in places, touching in a few, but overall it was just a sad little bashfest that provided little of value to the audience.

 

sounds like an Oliver Stone film, oh wait.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (mr_genius @ Oct 20, 2008 -> 12:52 AM)
was there a scene where W is flying a jet plane drunk? i thought i read something about that. W's passenger was like "is this the first time you've flown a jet?" and W was like "this is how you learn"

 

 

that scene was not part of the movie.

 

I agree about the relationship between 41 and 43. That was by far the most interesting plot line of the movie. I think the pretzel scene(s) were used to transform the movie from current tense to past tense, when he was remembering things from his past.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...