Jump to content

Alexei Ramirez - 2nd in Rookie of Year Voting


Heads22

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 10, 2008 -> 03:29 PM)
Exactly where he should have finished... Personally I hate that professionals from other countries are considered rookies here, but that is another story.

 

 

Longoria has been a pro since 2006. At least, he was playing stronger baseball than Alexei according to some expert that have said cuban league is A/AA ball.

 

Congrat to Longo!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 10, 2008 -> 04:29 PM)
Exactly where he should have finished... Personally I hate that professionals from other countries are considered rookies here, but that is another story.

 

Why? Everyone with an opinion on the matter said that Cuban Baseball is equivalent to AA baseball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 10, 2008 -> 06:56 PM)
who really did have a better year between Aviles and Ramirez though? Just food for thought.

 

Should playing for a contender be put into consideration the way MVP is?

 

Just saying, you look past the stats, Lexi won some pretty key games for us. What he did would be impressive for a seasoned vet, let alone a rookie.

Edited by rangercal
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Jenksy Cat @ Nov 10, 2008 -> 06:14 PM)
I still don't understand why its a-ok for Long to get ROY after missing a month with a broken wrist, but for El Los to not have a chance in hell to get the MVP. Makes 0 sense.

Well Longoria's main competition or the award got about 5 month's worth of plate appearances (Evan: 508, Alexei: 509) while Quentin's main competition finished with 150-160 more PA (Quentin: 569, Morneau: 712, Pedroia: 726) so the 2 situations aren't exactly equal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im putting this here because more people will see it than in the other ROY thread in diamond club...this is from neyer's blog and points out just how brutal these awards are

 

In the NL, an oddity: Edinson Volquez finished fourth in the balloting, which is odd for a couple of reasons. One, he was better than third-place finisher Jair Jurrjens. And two, Volquez wasn't a rookie in 2008. He got three second-place votes anyway, and the BBWAA counted them. (Feel free to insert your own joke here.)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Nov 10, 2008 -> 05:31 PM)
Well Longoria's main competition or the award got about 5 month's worth of plate appearances (Evan: 508, Alexei: 509) while Quentin's main competition finished with 150-160 more PA (Quentin: 569, Morneau: 712, Pedroia: 726) so the 2 situations aren't exactly equal.

 

Yeah, and I understand that, but along with not really keeping tabs on theTwins or Red Sox as often as our guys, it just seems like Quentin's time was more potent based on clutch, game winners, etc., than the other two. A shot of Jack to a beer if you will... If I were a pitcher Quentin would be the one of the three that I would most try to throw unhittable garbage at. Morneau follows from a distance. On a side note, I can't imagine Pedroia even dreaming about the level of production that he just turned in in even as little as two year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good job, Lexi. Second is nice.

That was amazing when Longoria homered off us his first two bats of the postseason.

That set a lousy tone for us in the series.

I still think CQ might have had that same effect on our Sox down the stretch and in the playoffs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 10, 2008 -> 02:29 PM)
Exactly where he should have finished... Personally I hate that professionals from other countries are considered rookies here, but that is another story.

 

:notworthy

 

It is hard to give an all encompassing definition that fits everyone but if you are playing against the highest level of talent available overseas, it seems you should be ineligible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had a debate this week on a Twins board with a moderator (who for the most part is a pretty knowledgeable guy).

 

He said he wasn't impressed with Alexei and felt that he "hadn't lived up to the hype".

 

Hype??

 

When a guy gets a 4 year - $4M contract after working out for MLB teams... and the MLB scouting bureau gives him a 47 OFP - projecting him to be a utility player... where's the hype?

 

Seems to me that given the relatively low scouting expectations (and money offers) that Alexei knocked it out of the park this year.

 

One of the key points in our debate was whether there was a connection between hype and the size of contract offers.

 

I said "yes... obviously... because hype draws suitors". He said "no... there is not a connection".

 

 

Anybody else have an opinion on this?

 

How much hype did Alexei have coming in. And did he under or over perform relative to the hype?

 

 

(BTW - The Twins mod told me he'd much rather have Iwamura who he felt is a better player.) :o

Edited by scenario
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...