TCQ Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 Astros acquired LHP Tyler Lumsden from the Royals for a player to be named or cash. Lumsden was designated for assignment by the Royals after going 3-13 with a 7.21 ERA in Triple-A last season. The cost was surely minimal and 40-man roster spots aren't at a premium in Houston, so there's no harm in taking him on. However, it's quite unlikely that Lumsden will ever amount to anything. Ouch thats gotta hurt the ol self esteem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 QUOTE (TCQ @ Nov 24, 2008 -> 08:15 PM) Astros acquired LHP Tyler Lumsden from the Royals for a player to be named or cash. Lumsden was designated for assignment by the Royals after going 3-13 with a 7.21 ERA in Triple-A last season. The cost was surely minimal and 40-man roster spots aren't at a premium in Houston, so there's no harm in taking him on. However, it's quite unlikely that Lumsden will ever amount to anything. Ouch thats gotta hurt the ol self esteem Buh, Buh, We traded him for Mike Mcdougal! What do you mean that trade wasn't as terrible as we like to think it was? Look, i know that Cortes is the real prospect, but i never felt this deal was as bad as it was labeled. This report lends even more credence to that theory. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Nov 24, 2008 -> 08:19 PM) Buh, Buh, We traded him for Mike Mcdougal! What do you mean that trade wasn't as terrible as we like to think it was? Look, i know that Cortes is the real prospect, but i never felt this deal was as bad as it was labeled. This report lends even more credence to that theory. MacDougal signed a contract extension and has proceeded to be absolutely f***ing terrible. It was a bad deal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Nov 25, 2008 -> 01:41 AM) MacDougal signed a contract extension and has proceeded to be absolutely f***ing terrible. It was a bad deal. Mike MacDougals subsequent failure made the deal bad, it doesn't matter who we sent there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 25, 2008 -> 07:22 AM) Mike MacDougals subsequent failure made the deal bad, it doesn't matter who we sent there. Precisely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted November 25, 2008 Share Posted November 25, 2008 He was one of the better relievers in baseball in '06. He had one bad year, though I guess we are still paying for him to not pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.