Jimmywins1 Posted December 3, 2008 Share Posted December 3, 2008 I read somewhere that his fastball sits around 93 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (Jimmywins1 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 05:44 PM) I read somewhere that his fastball sits around 93 Worst-case scenario, Santos and Nunez (Yankees deal) are two promising young bullpen arms that contribute a couple of years from now. Lefties that throw 93 aren't easy to come by and are pretty valuable commodities, although we've now ditched two in Marte and Logan. Remembering the Everett trade, it was Frank Francisco who had the biggest impact. At the time, many really liked Anthony Webster and Rupe. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 06:02 PM) Worst-case scenario, Santos and Nunez (Yankees deal) are two promising young bullpen arms that contribute a couple of years from now. Lefties that throw 93 aren't easy to come by and are pretty valuable commodities, although we've now ditched two in Marte and Logan. Remembering the Everett trade, it was Frank Francisco who had the biggest impact. At the time, many really liked Anthony Webster and Rupe. I would say worst-case scenerio is these two never wear major league uniforms. If worst case scenerio is what you claim, KW should be in jail. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 06:05 PM) I would say worst-case scenerio is these two never wear major league uniforms. If worst case scenerio is what you claim, KW should be in jail. Maybe he will be in jail if Wilder implicates him, lol. Wouldn't that be a shocker? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisox2334 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 trade be done thursday pending the physicals. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Dec 4, 2008 -> 01:08 AM) Maybe he will be in jail if Wilder implicates him, lol. Wouldn't that be a shocker? Not really, there's a lot of baseball executives who hope this story fades away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (kageman129 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 04:25 PM) I am so happy with how this offseason has went so far! I love getting all these young players with upside. I just hope we hang on to all of them. Just divorce this idea from your mind right now, before you end up being disappointed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon_44 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 Here's what i can see happening. I think Broadway gets dealt for Tavares. I wouldn't be surprised if that hasn't already been agreed on. I think Dye gets moved to the Reds. If money is the issue in this trade maybe we send Dye,either BA or Owens,and maybe Lillibridge to the Reds for Bailey and either Arroyo or Harang.That would even the money out a little bit. Then the Sox sign Dunn in free agency. That would give us a team looking like: SP-Buehrle, Floyd,Danks, Harang, and Bailey/Poreda/Marquez/Richard bullpen:Thornton,Linebrink,loser of the 5th spot,Russel,Dotel, Jenks Lineup: CF-Tavares 2b-Getz RF-Quentin LF-Dunn DH-Thome 1B-Konerko SS-Alexei C-AJ 3B-Fields bench players: Betemit, Nix,backup C, Owens/BA, Wise Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) QUOTE (Lemon_44 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 08:00 PM) Here's what i can see happening. I think Broadway gets dealt for Tavares. I wouldn't be surprised if that hasn't already been agreed on. I think Dye gets moved to the Reds. If money is the issue in this trade maybe we send Dye,either BA or Owens,and maybe Lillibridge to the Reds for Bailey and either Arroyo or Harang.That would even the money out a little bit. Then the Sox sign Dunn in free agency. That would give us a team looking like: SP-Buehrle, Floyd,Danks, Harang, and Bailey/Poreda/Marquez/Richard bullpen:Thornton,Linebrink,loser of the 5th spot,Russel,Dotel, Jenks Lineup: CF-Tavares 2b-Getz RF-Quentin LF-Dunn DH-Thome 1B-Konerko SS-Alexei C-AJ 3B-Fields bench players: Betemit, Nix,backup C, Owens/BA, Wise I wouldn't want Thome and Dunn back-to-back. I'd hit Thome fourth, Konerko fifth and Dunn sixth. Or Dunn 4th and Thome 6th, depending on who was hottest. I also don't like Fields at the very bottom of the line-up. I'd be tempted to put Alexei there, but then you sacrifice some at-bats over the season. Also, Nix will probably go to the minors if he's not the starter. He can't play all over the diamond like Uribe/Getz/Betemit/Lillibridge. http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-bl...ng_hampton.html Very good article by Atlanta J-C writer on the Vazquel deal, although I think he's discounting any impact from the 3 other players we got in the deal too much, Gilmore in particular. Edited December 4, 2008 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chunk23 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Dec 4, 2008 -> 02:04 AM) I wouldn't want Thome and Dunn back-to-back. I'd hit Thome fourth, Konerko fifth and Dunn sixth. Or Dunn 4th and Thome 6th, depending on who was hottest. I also don't like Fields at the very bottom of the line-up. I'd be tempted to put Alexei there, but then you sacrifice some at-bats over the season. Also, Nix will probably go to the minors if he's not the starter. He can't play all over the diamond like Uribe/Getz/Betemit/Lillibridge. http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-bl...ng_hampton.html Very good article by Atlanta J-C writer on the Vazquel deal, although I think he's discounting any impact from the 3 other players we got in the deal too much, Gilmore in particular. It's just illustrating the point that generally KW doesn't try to fleece people in trades. It also shows how, barring another move, this trade doesn't help the Sox for 2009. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanne Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (Lemon_44 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 08:00 PM) Here's what i can see happening. I think Broadway gets dealt for Tavares. I wouldn't be surprised if that hasn't already been agreed on. I think Dye gets moved to the Reds. If money is the issue in this trade maybe we send Dye,either BA or Owens,and maybe Lillibridge to the Reds for Bailey and either Arroyo or Harang.That would even the money out a little bit. Then the Sox sign Dunn in free agency. That would give us a team looking like: SP-Buehrle, Floyd,Danks, Harang, and Bailey/Poreda/Marquez/Richard bullpen:Thornton,Linebrink,loser of the 5th spot,Russel,Dotel, Jenks Lineup: CF-Tavares 2b-Getz RF-Quentin LF-Dunn DH-Thome 1B-Konerko SS-Alexei C-AJ 3B-Fields bench players: Betemit, Nix,backup C, Owens/BA, Wise This team is no different really from last year with Dunn in the lineup. No thanks. Tavares in CF I can see. But not Dunn. Puts us back in the same old plodding HR hitting funk which people have b****ed about the past few year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lemon_44 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (Wanne @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 09:14 PM) This team is no different really from last year with Dunn in the lineup. No thanks. Tavares in CF I can see. But not Dunn. Puts us back in the same old plodding HR hitting funk which people have b****ed about the past few year. How about Abreu instead of Dunn,bat him second, and move Getz to 9th. For some reason,i think we'll sign either Dunn or Abreu. I know most people want Furcal but i can't see KW spending the money on him with all the middle infield prospects he's acquired. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (Lemon_44 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 06:34 PM) How about Abreu instead of Dunn,bat him second, and move Getz to 9th. For some reason,i think we'll sign either Dunn or Abreu. I know most people want Furcal but i can't see KW spending the money on him with all the middle infield prospects he's acquired. Personally, I just can't see KW trading away a JD to clear the way to sign an Abreu. But I've been surprised before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) QUOTE (Wanne @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 08:14 PM) This team is no different really from last year with Dunn in the lineup. No thanks. Tavares in CF I can see. But not Dunn. Puts us back in the same old plodding HR hitting funk which people have b****ed about the past few year. Not just last year, LAST DECADE!!! Personally, I just can't see KW trading away a JD to clear the way to sign an Abreu. But I've been surprised before. It doesn't really make sense. As noted, Abreu is going to hit 15-25 homers at USCF, not 30-45. He might have a better OBP, he MIGHT be a better defender...but he has slipped significantly. I suppose we could look at it as saving $3-4 million per season over Dye AND getting a pitcher back to take Vazquez's spot in the rotation. Just seems kind of backwards. Well, really the question is would it be better to buy a pitcher in the market or give up Dye in order to acquire one? I guess in KW's line of thinking, trading talent for younger/affordable starters is almost always better than buying veterans FA pitchers on the open market. Edited December 4, 2008 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michelangelosmonkey Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 08:45 PM) Not just last year, LAST DECADE!!! Personally, I just can't see KW trading away a JD to clear the way to sign an Abreu. But I've been surprised before. It doesn't really make sense. As noted, Abreu is going to hit 15-25 homers at USCF, not 30-45. He might have a better OBP, he MIGHT be a better defender...but he has slipped significantly. I suppose we could look at it as saving $3-4 million per season over Dye AND getting a pitcher back to take Vazquez's spot in the rotation. Just seems kind of backwards. Well, really the question is would it be better to buy a pitcher in the market or give up Dye in order to acquire one? I guess in KW's line of thinking, trading talent for younger/affordable starters is almost always better than buying veterans FA pitchers on the open market. You mean the "LAST DECADE" where we won three divisions, finished 2nd 4 times and won a World Series? That is the decade you don't want to repeat? Adam Dunn is a high on base, high power guy that would fit great on the team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) QUOTE (michelangelosmonkey @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 09:37 PM) You mean the "LAST DECADE" where we won three divisions, finished 2nd 4 times and won a World Series? That is the decade you don't want to repeat? Adam Dunn is a high on base, high power guy that would fit great on the team No, you misunderstand. I said that's been the complaint the past decade. Up until this year, Minnesota's approach has been more consistent in winning divisions, but then 2005 and 2008 kind of erases that...we definitely had the more talented teams than Minny most of those years, but we were too one dimensional offensively. With that said, pitching is almost always what wins championships...I do think when we look back on the decade, we'll wonder about 2003 and 2006, in particular. We had a huge payroll disparity with the Twins, and yet they played us evenly over that time period. Edited December 4, 2008 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkokieSox Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 Maybe the Sox go after Pat Burrell? Taveras/Lillibridge CF Rameriz SS Quentin RF Thome DH PK 1B Burrell LF AJ C Fields 3B Getz 2nd Lot of right handers though, but I think Burrell would be a good addition. MB Floyd Danks Bailey Marquez Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 My some-what realistic Dream lineup (Don't ask me how): 1. Figgins, 3B 2. Getz/Lillibridge, 2B 3. Quentin, RF 4. Thome, DH 5. Konerko, 1B 6. Dunn, LF 7. Ramirez, SS 8. Pierzynski, C 9. Tavares, CF I guess some explanation for this could be Angels wanting and trading for Dye to fill in at 1B/DH for a year or two if they don't resign Tex (which they likely won't), and us getting Figgins and something else in return. Then trade something little for Tavares, and then package Fields and something else for a decent 4th or 5th starter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (SEALgep @ Dec 4, 2008 -> 05:28 AM) MB Floyd Danks Bailey Marquez Yikes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (fathom @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 11:31 PM) Yikes Kinda reminds me of the 2007-08 team of the 4-5 question marks with Floyd and Danks. Not saying it could be a repeat or not, but say if the sox do make those moves, the odds of the same thing happening again (the 4-5 exceeding expectations) are slim. I will say this, in a hetero way, Bailey excites the hell outta me because of his ceiling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 Who is our next Vazquez? I screened all those pitchers who have thrown 200 IP or more in one of the last 3 seasons and might be available. Padilla D. Davis K. Rogers Schilling Dave Bush J. Jennings Fr. Garcia Millwood Capuano Glavine Harang Moyer A. Cook B. Penny P. Maholm I. Snell PETITTE Suppan D. Willis Pelfrey D. CABRERA B. Arroyo C. Silva LOOPER Wainwright Gorzelanny Z. Duke Sheets Garland Jeff Francis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 Daniel Cabrera will be a member of the White Sox organization before Christmas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) QUOTE (Kalapse @ Dec 3, 2008 -> 11:07 PM) Daniel Cabrera will be a member of the White Sox organization before Christmas. We won't have to wait too long to find out...in the next couple of weeks. But you'd have to guess at least 10-15 other teams would at least have preliminary interest in Cabrera. That's where Ozzie and Cooper might give us the advantage, theoretically, in recruiting. I'll put it this way....I would rather find 3-4 Daniel Cabreras and sign them for $3-5 milllion each per season than bring in ONE Jake Peavy to USCF and the AL. The odds are very good that not putting all the eggs in one basket (like buying stocks) will end up bearing fruit if Don Cooper has anything to say about it. We can have a bet, Willy Taveras will be a member of the White Sox organization before December 31st. LOL. Edited December 4, 2008 by caulfield12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scenario Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 (edited) When I take a look at that steaming pile of pitching mediocrity (list of available pitchers)... I'm inspired to give a couple of young guys a chance instead. Edited December 4, 2008 by scenario Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted December 4, 2008 Share Posted December 4, 2008 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Dec 4, 2008 -> 12:07 AM) Daniel Cabrera will be a member of the White Sox organization before Christmas. Is there any chance he can take Matt Wieters with him? God damn that dude is good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.