Jimbo's Drinker Posted December 21, 2008 Share Posted December 21, 2008 Choose 2 Running backs Westrbook Lynch(injured?) Foster CHris Johnon Wide Receivers Lee Evans(healty quarterback back) Wes Welker(blizzard) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 I'd go with Johnson and Westbrook. Buffalo will use Jackson more if Lynch is even slightly injured and Foster will sit as well since TEN clinched homefield. Honestly, I'm hesitant to pick Johnson as well, but White may play less than he will next week. Johnson is younger and less pudgy, so he will at least play one half. I'd almost start Mewelde Moore vs. Cleveland's ugly rush D next week if you can get him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Hey, I won the championship. $300 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 Jimbo owes exactly 57.2 percent of his FF profits to Soxtalk Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 The Saints, Broncos, Vikings, and Chargers cumulatively get 14 offensive TDs yesterday. So how many of those 14 TDs went to my supposed studs of Brees, LT, Adrian Peterson, Marshall, and Royal? 2!! Argh!! I hate fantasy football. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 09:03 AM) So how many of those 14 TDs went to my supposed studs of Brees, LT, Adrian Peterson, Marshall, and Royal? 2!! As a Brees owner whom he helped to a championship, I believe you should retract him from that comment. Brees had both the touchdowns you speak of and had a decent day. Didn't Marshall put up like 12 points with a 120+ yard effort? You should complain about being the dude who took LT when all signs pointed to bad this year. Also, AP had an off-day, but never, EVER start two WR from the same team. Sorry to see you lost though, but your team was destined for failure! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 09:14 AM) As a Brees owner whom he helped to a championship, I believe you should retract him from that comment. Brees had both the touchdowns you speak of and had a decent day. Didn't Marshall put up like 12 points with a 120+ yard effort? You should complain about being the dude who took LT when all signs pointed to bad this year. Also, AP had an off-day, but never, EVER start two WR from the same team. Sorry to see you lost though, but your team was destined for failure! Going against the worst team in football I expected a ridiculous game by Brees. It wasn't bad but I would have expected at least 3 TDs against the Lions. I traded for LT a week before his bye. My top pick was Peterson. Thought LT would be a nice #2 especially after getting some added rest with the bye. Didn't really pan out. And for all the hype Marshall was getting early on he really wasn't a scoring machine. Sure he had a nice game but my opponents players were all getting TDs yesterday while my guys were just racking up yardage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 09:17 AM) Going against the worst team in football I expected a ridiculous game by Brees. It wasn't bad but I would have expected at least 3 TDs against the Lions. I traded for LT a week before his bye. My top pick was Peterson. Thought LT would be a nice #2 especially after getting some added rest with the bye. Didn't really pan out. And for all the hype Marshall was getting early on he really wasn't a scoring machine. Sure he had a nice game but my opponents players were all getting TDs yesterday while my guys were just racking up yardage. That can be incredibly annoying. More annoying I'm sure was my opponent owning Pierre Thomas. He and I got together to watch that NO/Detroit matchup (ahhh, what fantasy football does for the NFL). The Saints scored 4 rushing touchdowns, so you'd think I would have been sunk. Unfortunately for him, they decided to use some dude I've never heard of (Bell #40) and of course "on the goodbye run" Deuce McAllister. I laughed and I laughed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasox24 Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 09:14 AM) As a Brees owner whom he helped to a championship, I believe you should retract him from that comment. Brees had both the touchdowns you speak of and had a decent day. Didn't Marshall put up like 12 points with a 120+ yard effort? You should complain about being the dude who took LT when all signs pointed to bad this year. Also, AP had an off-day, but never, EVER start two WR from the same team. Sorry to see you lost though, but your team was destined for failure! Not true if you have Fitzgerald and Boldin... or Fitzgerald and Breaston when Boldin was hurt, like I did. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 22, 2008 Share Posted December 22, 2008 QUOTE (dasox24 @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 03:48 PM) Not true if you have Fitzgerald and Boldin... or Fitzgerald and Breaston when Boldin was hurt, like I did. There are typically a couple WR pairs each season that are good choices to start each week. Think of Holt/Bruce, Wayne/Harrison, Moss/Welker, etc in years past. Unfortunately for me I was not stacked at WR this season so I was forced to go with Marshall/Royal. Figured they got me that far so why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dasox24 Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 03:53 PM) There are typically a couple WR pairs each season that are good choices to start each week. Think of Holt/Bruce, Wayne/Harrison, Moss/Welker, etc in years past. Unfortunately for me I was not stacked at WR this season so I was forced to go with Marshall/Royal. Figured they got me that far so why not? I don't blame you at all for going with those 2. The Broncos pass enough for them to each have good games. Hell, Cutler had 350+ yards. Who would have thought that he'd run for 2 TDs instead of passing for even 1? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 04:53 PM) There are typically a couple WR pairs each season that are good choices to start each week. Think of Holt/Bruce, Wayne/Harrison, Moss/Welker, etc in years past. Unfortunately for me I was not stacked at WR this season so I was forced to go with Marshall/Royal. Figured they got me that far so why not? Brandon Lloyd and Rashied Davis Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted December 23, 2008 Share Posted December 23, 2008 QUOTE (dasox24 @ Dec 22, 2008 -> 07:00 PM) I don't blame you at all for going with those 2. The Broncos pass enough for them to each have good games. Hell, Cutler had 350+ yards. Who would have thought that he'd run for 2 TDs instead of passing for even 1? And we also get points for punt/kick-off return TDs so Royal always has that potential. IDP league. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.