Jump to content

MLB.com top 50 Prospects


joejoesox

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (sircaffey @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 11:49 AM)
I find 37-50 to be very questionable for the most part.

I don't follow prospects very much but Samardzija at 50 seems very questionable to me. I remember everyone saying the Cubs reached even taking into account his questionable status due to football. Also, there's obviously reasons people could give, but in September he was awful, flat-out awful.

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/pspli...1&year=2008

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bschmaranz @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 02:54 PM)
I think Samardzija being on the list is more ridiculous then any Sox omission from the list.

 

That's the reason the Cubs are always talked about trading s***ty prospects for great players. The media blows their prospects, even though they're garbage, and they get more in return.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 04:48 PM)
I wonder how many of you copy/pasted or read the mlb list there so that you could spell "Samardzija" correctly. ;)

I will admit that I did, I even tried to look at it, memorize it and spell it first and messed it up, and I have an excellent memory

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...