joejoesox Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/minorleagues/prospects/y2009/ Slightly different list than what was on ESPN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Wow they are f***ing retarded. Becks outhit pretty much everyone in AFL including people on that list. The real brains behind prospect lists have him in the 20's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melissa1334 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 in 07, we ended up taking poreda over porcello...bcuz of boras right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I find 37-50 to be very questionable for the most part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Im sorry, knowing this guy personally through Chicago nightlife and now this: http://www.jeff-samardzija.com/index.asp He is such a douche Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 QUOTE (sircaffey @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 11:49 AM) I find 37-50 to be very questionable for the most part. I don't follow prospects very much but Samardzija at 50 seems very questionable to me. I remember everyone saying the Cubs reached even taking into account his questionable status due to football. Also, there's obviously reasons people could give, but in September he was awful, flat-out awful. http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/pspli...1&year=2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I think Samardzija being on the list is more ridiculous then any Sox omission from the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 I wonder how many of you copy/pasted or read the mlb list there so that you could spell "Samardzija" correctly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted January 30, 2009 Share Posted January 30, 2009 Wow, that is kind of questionable. Still wish we took Porcello. I remember being so pissed that we didn't and I still am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 QUOTE (bschmaranz @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 02:54 PM) I think Samardzija being on the list is more ridiculous then any Sox omission from the list. That's the reason the Cubs are always talked about trading s***ty prospects for great players. The media blows their prospects, even though they're garbage, and they get more in return. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 30, 2009 -> 04:48 PM) I wonder how many of you copy/pasted or read the mlb list there so that you could spell "Samardzija" correctly. I will admit that I did, I even tried to look at it, memorize it and spell it first and messed it up, and I have an excellent memory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 While Samardzija is rated a little high, he's a top 100 prospect for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted January 31, 2009 Share Posted January 31, 2009 I've always said that the only prospect list anyone should give a s*** about is BA. f*** Keith Law, MLB.com, and all this other s***. BA follows prospects more closely, talks to a lot more scouts, managers, etc. Plus it's the whole staff that makes the list not just one guy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts