Jump to content

Important poll. Please vote


mr_genius

Help settle a dispute  

22 members have voted

  1. 1. Who is history's greatest monster?

    • Ronald Reagan
      15
    • Jimmy Carter
      9


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 69
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (mreye @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 03:12 PM)
Will I be allowed the same freedom to post a poll that's derogatory and intended to piss off African Americans?

 

By far the funniest post in the thread. "This pisses me off! Ipso Facto, I should be able to piss off blacks!"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 10:41 AM)
By far the funniest post in the thread. "This pisses me off! Ipso Facto, I should be able to piss off blacks!"

No, the funniest post in the thread is the one that started it. He gets the biggest laugh out of the debacle he created, and which is probably going exactly as he expected it would.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, a monster is a fictional character and we are discussing who may be closer to this concept of a "monster". At the core is conscious and value systems. If I was to place Carter and Reagan on this scale, with no conscious on one side and a "God-like" one on the other, I'd have Reagan closer to monster than Carter. However, neither one would be close enough to really call a monster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Feb 20, 2009 -> 01:38 AM)
Reagan was bad. But I'm not going to say anymore for fear of being a part of this stupid thread accomplishing it's worthless goal.

 

You are upset that someone else is making outrageous statements just to stir the pot? He totally stole your schtick!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Chet Lemon @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 11:56 PM)
The only monster here is Barack Obama, the same Barack Obama who wants to have the Iranian government over for tea. Carter was the same as Obama. Ronald Reagan would have stood tall against those bastards!

After he closes GTMO he's going to give all the terrorists there full pardons, then put them up in government housing and give them food stamps and other handouts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bmags @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 10:41 AM)
By far the funniest post in the thread. "This pisses me off! Ipso Facto, I should be able to piss off blacks!"

 

I think you miss the point. The thread is intended to create a rise out of a certain segment of Soxtalk. My point is we wouldn't (and shouldn't) allow someone to do the same with black, Jews, etc. I was demonstrating absurdity by being absurd.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (mreye @ Feb 20, 2009 -> 01:06 PM)
I think you miss the point. The thread is intended to create a rise out of a certain segment of Soxtalk. My point is we wouldn't (and shouldn't) allow someone to do the same with black, Jews, etc. I was demonstrating absurdity by being absurd.

Actually, if I remember the argument from the other thread correctly, he was mostly making fun of Balta.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Texsox @ Feb 19, 2009 -> 11:16 AM)
To me, a monster is a fictional character and we are discussing who may be closer to this concept of a "monster". At the core is conscious and value systems. If I was to place Carter and Reagan on this scale, with no conscious on one side and a "God-like" one on the other, I'd have Reagan closer to monster than Carter. However, neither one would be close enough to really call a monster.

 

Reagan did look pretty monster-like in "Land of Confusion."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...