ozzfest Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 "According to the Denver Post's account of Monday's meeting between Jay Cutler and the Broncos, Cutler left the conference call believing he will be traded if Denver finds "the right deal" between now and the NFL Draft. In addition to Josh McDaniels and Pat Bowlen, the Post says GM Brian Xanders and Cutler's agent Bus Cook took part in the discussion. Cutler reportedly entered the conference call hoping all would be resolved, but was told "no one is untradeable." Cutler has not decided yet whether to report for OTAs." -per rotoworld Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 lol Cutler is a little b****. I doubt if anything comes of this though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Mr Angelo, Please do something! Anything! Please! Besides letting go of players, how about find replacements! This is as frustrating as the Sox off season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metz Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Yes, please JA, Cutler would be a vital add to the team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I would trade Matt Forte and Orton for Cutler or Forte and a future 2nd or this years 3rd. I'd probably even go with Forte and our 2nd pick for Cutler. Franchise QB's don't grow on trees. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Whatever it takes Period. Period. Period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 If he's really out there I hope Angelo makes a serious run at him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I am not getting my hopes up this time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 QUOTE (rangercal @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 01:51 AM) I am not getting my hopes up this time. your the smart one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxbrian Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 I'd give them whatever they want for Ryan Clady and Brandon Marshall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 QUOTE (rangercal @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 01:51 AM) I am not getting my hopes up this time. Great strategy, because it won't happen. The Bears will not pay a franchise QB. They never have, and they never will under this management. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 09:38 AM) Great strategy, because it won't happen. The Bears will not pay a franchise QB. They never have, and they never will under this management. And unless you have an elite defense then, you won't win the big one in the NFL without a franchise QB in this day and age. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 QUOTE (DBAHO @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 08:45 AM) And unless you have an elite defense then, you won't win the big one in the NFL without a franchise QB in this day and age. But we are the Bears. We run the ball and beat your noses in on defense. This high powered offense thing is pure silliness. It's not blue collar" enough. I'd put that in green, but to many people believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 Oh and anyone who will tell me how great Forte is, I will tell you that running backs in the NFl are a dime a dozen and potential franchise QB's don't grow on trees. A franchise QB can run your franchise for 12-15 seasons where as a premiere running back and your lucky to get 5-6 real good seasons of production. Bottom line the value of a QB is a s***load higher than the value of a RB (and I love forte). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 11, 2009 Share Posted March 11, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 11:50 AM) Oh and anyone who will tell me how great Forte is, I will tell you that running backs in the NFl are a dime a dozen and potential franchise QB's don't grow on trees. A franchise QB can run your franchise for 12-15 seasons where as a premiere running back and your lucky to get 5-6 real good seasons of production. Bottom line the value of a QB is a s***load higher than the value of a RB (and I love forte). I can not disagree with any of this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 10:50 AM) Oh and anyone who will tell me how great Forte is, I will tell you that running backs in the NFl are a dime a dozen and potential franchise QB's don't grow on trees. A franchise QB can run your franchise for 12-15 seasons where as a premiere running back and your lucky to get 5-6 real good seasons of production. Bottom line the value of a QB is a s***load higher than the value of a RB (and I love forte). Thanks for going through both sides of the argument for us. Either way, you trade Forte and you have to look for one of those "dime a dozen backs" which have eluded the Bears since the 90's. It makes them take a large step back, its easier for them to trade draft picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 12, 2009 -> 12:36 PM) Thanks for going through both sides of the argument for us. Either way, you trade Forte and you have to look for one of those "dime a dozen backs" which have eluded the Bears since the 90's. It makes them take a large step back, its easier for them to trade draft picks. Matt Forte is a good player at an important position. Jay Cutler has the chance to be a GREAT PLAYER at the MOST IMPORTANT POSITION. If you disagree with this assessment... than thats the end of the discussion. I think you're wrong, but its sports... who cares. I think that's really the only argument there is to be made. I mean you can say that Forte may be the next Walter Payton, but I don't think his play suggests that (not talking stat-wise here), he doesn't possess the type of game breaking skills that separate a good RB from a transcendent RB like LT, AP, Barry Sanders etc... I think the "dime a dozen" argument doesn't necessarily apply to Forte because he's better a 1000 yard journeyman who averages 3.0 yards a carry. However, you can find a RB who will provide enough production where there will be an overall gain in offensive production by adding Cutler than if keeping Forte. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 12, 2009 -> 01:36 PM) Thanks for going through both sides of the argument for us. Either way, you trade Forte and you have to look for one of those "dime a dozen backs" which have eluded the Bears since the 90's. It makes them take a large step back, its easier for them to trade draft picks. Forte could be the next GREAT bears back (Sayers,Payton,Anderson) . He could also be the next Atrain. Anything in sports is a RISK. Forte is not a sure thing either way. The exact same argument can be made for Cutler. I would say Cutler and Forte have about the same odds to be GREAT. As a bear fan who was giddy when Grossman was a MVP candidate the first 5 weeks of 2006, I would love nothing more then to take a chance on an Elite QB, even at the expense of Forte. Edited March 12, 2009 by rangercal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 QUOTE (MurcieOne @ Mar 12, 2009 -> 12:59 PM) I think that's really the only argument there is to be made. I mean you can say that Forte may be the next Walter Payton, but I don't think his play suggests that (not talking stat-wise here), he doesn't possess the type of game breaking skills that separate a good RB from a transcendent RB like LT, AP, Barry Sanders etc... I think the "dime a dozen" argument doesn't necessarily apply to Forte because he's better a 1000 yard journeyman who averages 3.0 yards a carry. However, you can find a RB who will provide enough production where there will be an overall gain in offensive production by adding Cutler than if keeping Forte. I dont think Forte is dime a dozen and I think the Bears would be stronger with Forte+Cutler vs Cutler+unknown draft pick or Kevin Jones. I think the Bears would be ready to compete if they just traded draft picks. That was my point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 12, 2009 -> 03:16 PM) I dont think Forte is dime a dozen and I think the Bears would be stronger with Forte+Cutler vs Cutler+unknown draft pick or Kevin Jones. I think the Bears would be ready to compete if they just traded draft picks. That was my point. Of course I would prefer to trade a 1st and a 2nd for cutler. (that's a lot more than what I hear Denver was asking from Detroit) , but if it came down to Forte for Cutler, I would do it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Mar 12, 2009 -> 02:16 PM) I dont think Forte is dime a dozen and I think the Bears would be stronger with Forte+Cutler vs Cutler+unknown draft pick or Kevin Jones. I think the Bears would be ready to compete if they just traded draft picks. That was my point. We absolutely agree on that point. Matt Forte(while a 2nd rounder last year) would probably be worth close to a first round (late firstround) pick this year. You'd have to imagine that a team would rather have a somewhat known commodity like Forte rather than pick someone in the late first round, pay them first round money, and have no idea of how they will perform. I was tooting the Forte horn from the time we drafted him last year, I was finally right! (Rexy still stings SO MUCH!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rangercal Posted March 12, 2009 Share Posted March 12, 2009 I worry about trading Forte for the following reasons: Excelled in a 1 dimensional offense (ran over the extra guy in the box quite a few times.) Excelled despite a bad Oline. Very good receiver in a league with many 1 dimensional backs. Did it as a rookie. With that said.... QB>RB Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 11, 2009 -> 09:38 AM) Great strategy, because it won't happen. The Bears will not pay a franchise QB. They never have, and they never will under this management. You have to actually find one before you can pay one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxbrian Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 QUOTE (rangercal @ Mar 12, 2009 -> 01:26 PM) I worry about trading Forte for the following reasons: Excelled in a 1 dimensional offense (ran over the extra guy in the box quite a few times.) Excelled despite a bad Oline. Very good receiver in a league with many 1 dimensional backs. Did it as a rookie. Kept his mouth shut and his slate clean off the field. Was a good blocker. With that said.... QB>RB Added 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted March 13, 2009 Share Posted March 13, 2009 If they can throw away a 1st rounder to get Rick Mirer, they can trade a 1st and 2nd for Cutler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts