Jump to content

White Sox (1-1) vs. Royals (1-1) 1:05-CSN


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 713
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (whitesoxbrian @ Apr 9, 2009 -> 04:42 PM)
I love Quentin, and I love this team. But something has to be done with all these cloggers in a row.

Quentin is not a clogger, I'm not sure why people lump him in with Thome-Dye-Konerko-AJ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 9, 2009 -> 03:40 PM)
The Sox had at least 3 separate 8 game winning streaks in 05, maybe 4...and notably, 2 of them happened right at the end of the season, where our guys were simply more able to push for a few more games than the other teams were.
Evidence?

What about right after the all-star break when the Sox played ~.500 ball? Were they too tired then? Also, Cleveland wasn't "too tired", they couldn't continue winning more than 75% of their games.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 9, 2009 -> 04:41 PM)
If Dotel came in and the leadoff guy hit a homer, you would have said Dotel is a one inning pitcher how come Jenks didn't come in?

 

 

No I wouldnt. I'm not a fan of bringing in the closer in the 9th inning of a tied game. Extra innings is of course different.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Apr 9, 2009 -> 03:35 PM)
That's on the rule book.

 

So the rule book states that the out is given if a player does not have control of the ball yet still attempts a transfer? I don't think so.

 

You are supposed to have definitive control of the ball, he did not. Really that simple.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...