Jump to content

White Sox @ Tigers 12:05pm CSNHD


WSoxMatt

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 709
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

BTW, the Knights pitching has been awful so far:

 

Individual Stats (Pitching) (click column headers to sort)

Player W L ERA G GS CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR HB BB SO WHIP HLD GF

Wes Whisler 1 0 4.50 1 1 0 0 0 6.0 9 3 3 0 0 1 2 1.67 0 0

Lance Broadway 0 1 5.40 1 1 0 0 0 5.0 5 4 3 1 1 2 4 1.40 0 0

John Van Benschoten 0 1 5.40 1 1 0 0 0 5.0 2 3 3 1 1 2 6 0.80 0 0

Adam Russell 0 0 0.00 2 0 0 0 1 4.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0.00 0 1

Jack Egbert 0 0 10.12 2 0 0 0 0 2.2 4 3 3 1 0 1 3 1.88 0 1

Kelvin Jimenez 0 0 15.43 1 0 0 0 0 2.1 4 4 4 1 1 2 2 2.57 0 0

Jon Link 0 0 7.71 2 0 0 0 0 2.1 1 2 2 0 0 2 5 1.29 0 1

Randy Williams 0 0 4.50 2 0 0 0 0 2.0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1.00 0 1

Ehren Wassermann 0 0 18.00 1 0 0 0 0 2.0 6 5 4 0 0 1 2 3.50 0 0

Jeffrey Marquez 0 1 32.40 1 1 0 0 0 1.2 6 6 6 0 0 1 0 4.20 0 0

Jimmy Gobble 0 0 36.00 1 0 0 0 0 1.0 3 4 4 0 0 2 2 5.00 0

 

Although the sample size is small, outside of Russell, everyone else has been below average to horrid.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 13, 2009 -> 02:56 PM)
BTW, the Knights pitching has been awful so far:

 

Individual Stats (Pitching) (click column headers to sort)

Player W L ERA G GS CG SHO SV IP H R ER HR HB BB SO WHIP HLD GF

Wes Whisler 1 0 4.50 1 1 0 0 0 6.0 9 3 3 0 0 1 2 1.67 0 0

Lance Broadway 0 1 5.40 1 1 0 0 0 5.0 5 4 3 1 1 2 4 1.40 0 0

John Van Benschoten 0 1 5.40 1 1 0 0 0 5.0 2 3 3 1 1 2 6 0.80 0 0

Adam Russell 0 0 0.00 2 0 0 0 1 4.0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 0.00 0 1

Jack Egbert 0 0 10.12 2 0 0 0 0 2.2 4 3 3 1 0 1 3 1.88 0 1

Kelvin Jimenez 0 0 15.43 1 0 0 0 0 2.1 4 4 4 1 1 2 2 2.57 0 0

Jon Link 0 0 7.71 2 0 0 0 0 2.1 1 2 2 0 0 2 5 1.29 0 1

Randy Williams 0 0 4.50 2 0 0 0 0 2.0 2 1 1 0 0 0 1 1.00 0 1

Ehren Wassermann 0 0 18.00 1 0 0 0 0 2.0 6 5 4 0 0 1 2 3.50 0 0

Jeffrey Marquez 0 1 32.40 1 1 0 0 0 1.2 6 6 6 0 0 1 0 4.20 0 0

Jimmy Gobble 0 0 36.00 1 0 0 0 0 1.0 3 4 4 0 0 2 2 5.00 0

 

Although the sample size is small, outside of Russell, everyone else has been below average to horrid.

 

That is really bad. Yikes.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Apr 13, 2009 -> 02:53 PM)
But, a key part of why we were able to get him in the first place is that his #'s in 2007 were down from his #'s in 2006 as well. So you actually had a 2 year downward trend, starting from 2007.
Actually, he was pretty much the same production-wise in 2006 and 2007. More HR and higher SLG in 2006, more doubles, higher OBP and higher average in 2007. Last year is the aberrant year, so far, especially considering his fast start this season.

 

I didn't really like the Swisher trade at the start, but warmed up to it based on the rave reviews I kept hearing about Marquez and Nunez. I'm slowly moving back towards not liking it, though. I'm guessing the trade was made mostly because Ozzie, KW, and/or some of the players didn't think he was a good fit.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Apr 13, 2009 -> 02:58 PM)
Wow, Wise is going to be out for a while, isn't he?

probably....which is why its pretty important that lillibridge has the versatility to play CF....if its prolonged maybe alexei in CF and Gordo at SS? doubt it

Edited by daa84
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Apr 13, 2009 -> 02:51 PM)
They had a 4 run lead, I'm sure if a guy or 2 got on, they would have removed him. You cannot blow out your bullpen by the end of April.

 

This is very true, though i am not concerned. The sox bullpen is generally in the bottom of the league when it comes to the amount of innings pitched, which as you know is a positive.

Edited by qwerty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...