kev211 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (JPN366 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 05:09 PM) Okay, here's a list of available numbers not assigned to someone on the 40 man roster or a coach below #59... 1, 6, 27, 30, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 58 You can remove 35 from that list. Edited April 15, 2009 by kev211 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthshiner Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (JPN366 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 05:09 PM) Okay, here's a list of available numbers not assigned to someone on the 40 man roster or a coach below #59... 1, 6, 27, 30, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 58 any reason why Ricky Seilheimer was the last sox player to wear #6? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YASNY Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (earthshiner @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 11:05 PM) any reason why Ricky Seilheimer was the last sox player to wear #6? I've heard there are secret plans to retire the number in honor of Jorge Orta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthsideDon48 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 QUOTE (JPN366 @ Apr 15, 2009 -> 04:09 PM) Okay, here's a list of available numbers not assigned to someone on the 40 man roster or a coach below #59... 1, 6, 27, 30, 33, 35, 39, 49, 51, 58 Am I the only one that thinks #'s held by minor leaguers on the 40-man roster should be available to anyone that needs a number on the major league roster? For example, it kinda sucks we won't be seeing players wear numbers such as 24 and 48 for a while, even though the players currently holding those numbers are worthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earthshiner Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Hopefully we can add 47 to that list soon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozzfest Posted April 17, 2009 Share Posted April 17, 2009 no Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ron Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Pods actually talked about #22 on Waddle & Silvy. He said he is superstitious and wants his old # back, so he wants to talk with Josh about it. But he said he doesn't want to make a big deal of it if Josh doesn't want to give it up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Fields should retire let alone give up his number. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Josh is a real nice guy, so I'm sure he wouldn't have a problem with it.. So hopefully... Josh goes back to 27 (his rookie year number) He was really impressive that year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
qwerty Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 QUOTE (Ron @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 04:03 PM) Pods actually talked about #22 on Waddle & Silvy. He said he is superstitious and wants his old # back, so he wants to talk with Josh about it. But he said he doesn't want to make a big deal of it if Josh doesn't want to give it up. He already made too big of a deal about it, so there goes that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 Give it back to him, so I can sport my Pods 22 with WS patch on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 I don't know why but something about our starting 3B possibly giving up his number to a guy who was just signed to a minor league contract 2 weeks ago and hasn't done anything of note in the big leagues since 2005 rubs me the wrong way. I'm sure Josh will give up his number, I don't think he has much of a choice, that's a tough position to be in for a young ballplayer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (Kalapse @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 04:11 PM) I don't know why but something about our starting 3B possibly giving up his number to a guy who was just signed to a minor league contract 2 weeks ago and hasn't done anything of note in the big leagues since 2005 rubs me the wrong way. I'm sure Josh will give up his number, I don't think he has much of a choice, that's a tough position to be in for a young ballplayer. agree with all of the above Edited April 30, 2009 by BigSqwert Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted April 30, 2009 Share Posted April 30, 2009 QUOTE (qwerty @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 04:10 PM) He already made too big of a deal about it, so there goes that. "I might bring it up to him but it's not a big deal either way, doesn't really matter what number is on my back, I'm just happy to be back in Chicago." Was that so hard? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 30, 2009 Author Share Posted April 30, 2009 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Apr 30, 2009 -> 03:11 PM) I don't know why but something about our starting 3B possibly giving up his number to a guy who was just signed to a minor league contract 2 weeks ago and hasn't done anything of note in the big leagues since 2005 rubs me the wrong way. I'm sure Josh will give up his number, I don't think he has much of a choice, that's a tough position to be in for a young ballplayer. How could you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baines3 Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Give Pods his #22 back as that is the number we knew him with in 2005. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kjshoe04 Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Don't give in Josh. It's your number now. Why should he give up his number to Pods of all people? Josh is our starter and deserves whatever number he wants. A washed up bum like podsednik has no right to take it from Josh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPN366 Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Scott Podsednik, uniform #1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 QUOTE (JPN366 @ May 1, 2009 -> 02:26 PM) Scott Podsednik, uniform #1. What will Derrick Rose think? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Allen Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 QUOTE (JPN366 @ May 1, 2009 -> 01:26 PM) Scott Podsednik, uniform #1. The new 1 dog Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 QUOTE (JPN366 @ May 1, 2009 -> 01:26 PM) Scott Podsednik, uniform #1. Seriously? I suppose that is a hint of some kind about where in the lineup he expects to hit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 Looks like Fields didn't give in.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted May 1, 2009 Share Posted May 1, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ May 1, 2009 -> 03:08 PM) Seriously? I suppose that is a hint of some kind about where in the lineup he expects to hit. That's what it says on his MLB.com page but I doubt he's had a chance to speak to Fields before today. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthsideDon48 Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 I thought #1 was retired by the White Sox? Or am I confusing it with some of the other retired numbers? :-S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted May 2, 2009 Share Posted May 2, 2009 QUOTE (SouthsideDon48 @ May 1, 2009 -> 07:24 PM) I thought #1 was retired by the White Sox? Or am I confusing it with some of the other retired numbers? :-S Lance Johnson is the last guy I remember having that number for an extended period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.