Texsox Posted May 4, 2009 Share Posted May 4, 2009 QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ May 4, 2009 -> 10:17 AM) That's silly. Does a warm weather team not deserve to win the Super Bowl if such a thing happens because they don't play in "football weather"? Come on now, football is just like any other sport in my opinion, the weather should not be a factor in deciding the best team under ideal circumstances, who is the best team should be what decides it. Just like the one thing I don't like about baseball is you get weather like there was in Philadelphia during the World Series last year, 6 months of playing hard and the winner is decided in s*** conditions. Between assuring the game is played in 72 degree conditions, with less than a 3mph wind and 20% humidity or playing in an ice bowl, I agree, the warmer, nicer weather is better. However, I think the range of allowable conditions should include playing in 30 degree weather, I'd even take a little snow once in a while. The weather is the same for both teams, the better team will adapt to the conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattZakrowski Posted May 5, 2009 Share Posted May 5, 2009 I would trade a super bowl for a champions league final straight up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.