Jump to content

When did Thome become clutch?


Princess Dye

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (Jimbo's Drinker @ Jun 2, 2009 -> 12:12 AM)
prob the minute TCQ went down, someone has to step up.

 

 

I keep imagining this team with Slayer in the lineup.

 

Imagine if Richard and Floyd keep this up for awhile.

and/or Danks gets his stuff together a little more (he's gutted through his last 2 outings, but it seems he's on the verge of getting it really on track)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Clutch doesn’t exist; the real question is when did Jim Thome become a great hitter? The answer? 1991. His rookie year. He’s still got it, so people can continue to doubt him all they want. Personally, I don’t care. He’s winning ball games for my team. That’s all that matters,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sometimes get frustrated by the strikeouts, but I always love when they show his face with his helmet off when the team is celebrating a win or something. He's old school with the

crew cut and popeye body.

He's a big dude and a Hall of Famer. Wish we could make the WS with him on the team.

He may not be here next year.

Edited by greg775
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thome has been clutch forever. You don't hit 550 homers or drive in 1520 run without it. Heck all you have to do is think back to his Indian days of kicking our asses all over the field to remember it. Just because someone on a message board said he wasn't doesn't mean they are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So let me recap this entire argument before it continues on endlessly with neither side admitting defeat...

 

is clutch when he hits the ball fair/safe in an important situation.

 

is not clutch when he strikes out or hits into the shift/non shift in same situation.

 

I bet people said Alexei was clutch last year whenever he stepped up with the bases loaded, too.

 

:unsure:

Edited by Y2HH
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have players like Derek Jeter who are labeled "clutch" by everyone, but look at Jeter's stats. If he hits in the .290s, that's a "down" year for him. Then look at his postseason stats and you see that they're virtually identical to his career stats. Is he really "clutch" or is it just because he's one of the best pure hitters in the game? If you're a great player, generally speaking, you will be great in "clutch" situations too. When there appears to be a disparity, you can attribute that to data fluctuations due to small sample sizes.

 

On the other hand you have average players who get the reputations as being "clutch" (Crede for example) but realistically, that's your positive memories lying to you. Nearly all the time, if you look up their stats, they're not as impressive as you think they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jun 2, 2009 -> 12:59 AM)
As Thunderbolt got at, Thome's always been a great hitter, and great hitters are usually clutch. Thome's been doing this for a while.

 

500 was a walk-off, 550 was a game winning 3 run homer, what's he going to do with 600?

 

Hit and destroy a bank of lights on top of the stadium.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Princess Dye @ Jun 1, 2009 -> 11:53 PM)
He went from being a talented hitter who couldnt hit in the clutch, to perhaps now a less able guy who can.

 

When did this really start up? Game 163?

 

There's no such thing as clutch. If he was bad in the clutch for the last 17 years, law of averages says he will be good in thte clutch for the next 17 years :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, in regards to my earlier post, there's exceptions to everything - Joe Morgan for example never did s*** in the playoffs, like at all. Postseason batting average of .182 (222 PAs), .671 OPS that's way below his career OPS (.800, and for some reason I feel funny when I talk about Morgan's OPS because he's such an idiot on TV when it comes to stats even though OPS ironically helps his career look better).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Y'all are missing the obvious answer. It pops right out if you look at Big Jim's stats.

 

Against RHP, Jim in his career has this line:

.295 .430 .617 1.047, 448 HR.

 

Against LHP in his career, Jim has this line:

.240 .343 .425 .768, 102 HR.

 

Although he has a fair # of total home runs, against LHP in his career, Big Jim has been a fairly ordinary hitter, but he has absolutely destroyed RHP. Those splits are insane against RHP, but if you're an opposing manager, it gives you a solution if you see Jim coming up late in the game. Put in a LHP, and you've got a good chance of surviving to the next batter. Big Jim was the ultimate guy to put in a Loogy against. If you're talking about his performance early in the game versus late in the game...no manager is going to use up a LOOGY against Thome in the 4th inning, but they will very likely do so in the 8th inning of a close game. Jim's LHP/RHP splits alone therefore would make him a likely candidate to be "unclutch" because he's never hit LHP all that well.

 

No, le'ts look at the last 3 seasons vs. LHP:

 

.196 .314 .350 .663 - 2007

.233 .337 .521 .858 - 2008

.300 .417 .700 1.117 - 2009

 

It may be a simple sample size issue, but Jim's numbers the last 2 seasons against LHP have been vastly better than what he's done other years in his career. In other words...in 2007, you put in a LOOGY to shut jim down, and Jim shuts down late in the game. In 2008/2009 so far, you put in a LOOGY, and Jim's still doing his normal amount of damage - he's no longer a guy that you can shut down late in the game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Jun 2, 2009 -> 12:59 AM)
As Thunderbolt got at, Thome's always been a great hitter, and great hitters are usually clutch. Thome's been doing this for a while.

 

500 was a walk-off, 550 was a game winning 3 run homer, what's he going to do with 600?

The game-winning shot in game 163 in 2010.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My man-love for Peoria Jim continues to blossom.

 

Next big milestones are Killebrew, etc., but also 1000 career extra base hits - he's at 978, so he should get there by August.

 

Looking at the Sox teams of the near future, 2010 and 2011, I think we should try to keep him in the fold if he's still productive at the end of this season. He'd probably sign on the cheap, because:

 

A. he's close to home

B. he must realize that the team's prospects are very good for getting him his first WS ring.

 

We'll need his lefty power bat at least until Allen is ready, so I'm thinking a one year deal with a second year option if incentives are met.

 

He'll get his #600 next year, and he may pass Sosa, Griffey (who has just a few dingers left IMO), etc. in '11, and retire #6 all time, as a White Sox, behind only Bonds, Aaron, Ruth, Mays and ARoid. If you believe that Jimmy has done it the "right way", in the minds of many, he'll be #4 all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jun 2, 2009 -> 01:06 PM)
My man-love for Peoria Jim continues to blossom.

 

Next big milestones are Killebrew, etc., but also 1000 career extra base hits - he's at 978, so he should get there by August.

 

Looking at the Sox teams of the near future, 2010 and 2011, I think we should try to keep him in the fold if he's still productive at the end of this season. He'd probably sign on the cheap, because:

 

A. he's close to home

B. he must realize that the team's prospects are very good for getting him his first WS ring.

 

We'll need his lefty power bat at least until Allen is ready, so I'm thinking a one year deal with a second year option if incentives are met.

 

He'll get his #600 next year, and he may pass Sosa, Griffey (who has just a few dingers left IMO), etc. in '11, and retire #6 all time, as a White Sox, behind only Bonds, Aaron, Ruth, Mays and ARoid. If you believe that Jimmy has done it the "right way", in the minds of many, he'll be #4 all time.

Actually #3. Ruth was hopped up on tube steaks, scotch and whores.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jim is hitting .350/.487/.667/1.154 w/ 5 HR, 18 RBI and 17BB/16K over his last 20 games.

 

Just an idea of how huge Jim's bombs have been this year:

DATE  HR SITUATION RESULT INN LEAD/TIED

4/07: 3R DOWN LEAD 8th *

4/12: 2R TIED LEAD 6th **

4/19: 1R AHEAD -- 8th

4/22: 1R AHEAD up4 3rd

5/12: 2R TIED LEAD 1st ***

5/12: 2R DOWN LEAD 5th ****

5/18: 2R DOWN TIED 8th *****

5/25: 3R AHEAD -- 3rd

6/01: 3R TIED LEAD 8th ******

 

SPRAY CHART:

LF: 1

LC: 4

CF: 1

RC: 2

RF: 1

 

SPLITS:

RISP: 45 PA, .286/.422/.714/1.137, 4 HR 24 RBI

RISP 2 OUT: 19 PA, .375/.474/.875/1.349, 2 HR 13 RBI

CLOSE/LATE: 21 PA, .250/.286/.750/1.036, 3 HR 10 RBI

HIGH LVRGE: 30 PA, .296/.367/.778/1.144, 4 HR 15 RBI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...