VAfan Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 Nate McLouth, the gold glove winning CF for the Pirates, just ended up in Atlanta for 3 minor league prospects, one rated #4, another #7, and a third unrated. Further, McLouth is 27 and signed for 3 more seasons. He's got speed, some pop, and enough of an eye to have an OBP in the mid-.300s. I don't follow the NL that much, but am I wrong in thinking this guy could have been the answer we've been seeking in CF since Aaron Rowand rode out of town? Plus he's a lefty with some power, and by next year when Thome is gone, the Sox will have no one who can fill that job. What am I missing? Couldn't we have bettered Atlanta's deal and filled a glaring hole in our lineup and roster? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) Mclouth is an overrated defensive player with a decent bat. The Pirates were not actively shopping him, the Braves approached them, and “blew them out of the water.” I imagine KW has more important things on his mind. Edited June 5, 2009 by Thunderbolt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 The Sox couldn't have matched that offer unless we offered Poreda, Jordan Danks and something else. Plus, McLouth is incredibly overrated. So yeah. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 Poreda is better than anything offered, so is danks. So no, that statement isn't true felix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 04:31 PM) Poreda is better than anything offered, so is danks. So no, that statement isn't true felix. From everything I've read, both Jeff Locke and Gorkys Hernandez are considered pretty solid prospects. I might give you that Poreda is a better prospect than Locke, but it's not like the guys the Pirates got are scrubs or anything. I only know what I've been reading, but it seems like we would have had to overpay a lot to get him, and frankly McLouth isn't worth that. And for the record, BA has Gorkys Hernandez ranked as the 62nd best prospect in their 2009 rankings. #63? Poreda. Edited June 4, 2009 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 QUOTE (Felix @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 04:36 PM) From everything I've read, both Jeff Locke and Gorkys Hernandez are considered pretty solid prospects. I might give you that Poreda is a better prospect than Locke, but it's not like the guys the Pirates got are scrubs or anything. I only know what I've been reading, but it seems like we would have had to overpay a lot to get him, and frankly McLouth isn't worth that. And for the record, BA has Gorkys Hernandez ranked as the 62nd best prospect in their 2009 rankings. #63? Poreda. Unless the Pirates have their own Coop, Locke's gonna be a major project. Apparently the stuff is there, but he isn't much of a pitcher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 I'm glad we didn't get him. I'm still not sold on this team as a contender yet, no need to give up our future. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago White Sox Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 QUOTE (VAfan @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 04:26 PM) Nate McLouth, the gold glove winning CF for the Pirates, just ended up in Atlanta for 3 minor league prospects, one rated #4, another #7, and a third unrated. Further, McLouth is 27 and signed for 3 more seasons. He's got speed, some pop, and enough of an eye to have an OBP in the mid-.300s. I don't follow the NL that much, but am I wrong in thinking this guy could have been the answer we've been seeking in CF since Aaron Rowand rode out of town? Plus he's a lefty with some power, and by next year when Thome is gone, the Sox will have no one who can fill that job. What am I missing? Couldn't we have bettered Atlanta's deal and filled a glaring hole in our lineup and roster? Yeah, we easily could have bettered Atlanta’s deal, but McLouth is simply not worth the cost. We have a very good CF and leadoff prospect in Jordan Danks, who is probably a 1 - 1 ½ years away. Once Danks is ready, we’d have to move McLouth to a corner spot, where his production would only be league average at best. No reason to waste valuable assets on a short-term upgrade in CF. Also, it’s pretty clear that Kenny’s focus right now is a front-line starter who can help this year and in the future. We shouldn’t trade any of the young players we have in AA unless it’s for a right-handed, stud pitcher who’s locked up for several seasons. If we need do an upgrade at CF or 2B, we should be able to find some cheap short-term options once we get closer to the trading deadline just because of the economy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
South Side Fireworks Man Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 I hope KW is trying to get Hunter Pence here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 McClouth would just be benched behind Wise anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimbo's Drinker Posted June 4, 2009 Share Posted June 4, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 05:37 PM) McClouth would just be benched behind Wise anyway. good point, haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 09:30 PM) MMclouth is an overrated defensive player with a decent bat. The Pirates were not actively shopping him, the Braves approached them, and “blew them out of the water.” I imagine KW has more important things on his mind. Disagree. ESPN BBTN classified this trade as a steal for Atlanta and that McClouth is a good talent. I don't think they gave up that much to get the guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elrockinMT Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 10:37 PM) McClouth would just be benched behind Wise anyway. Sad but probably true Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Ginger Kid Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 Any chance we'll see Danks before the year's out? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daa84 Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 07:28 PM) Any chance we'll see Danks before the year's out? it would surprise me if its before the rosters expand....after that its possible, but hed have to be added to the 40 man....i would doubt if he does before september, but if the guy keeps hitting the way he has who knows Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 05:28 PM) Any chance we'll see Danks before the year's out? Still needs to cut down on the strikeouts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 07:25 PM) Disagree. ESPN BBTN classified this trade as a steal for Atlanta and that McClouth is a good talent. I don't think they gave up that much to get the guy. Oh man. If BBTN says it, it must be true! The Pirates are doing exactly what they should be doing and building for the future. That means trading the pieces like McLouth that aren't long-term answers for a bevy of prospects, which is exactly what they did. Both Hernandez and Locke are highly rated prospects, and Morton could probably go into their rotation right away. Some people don't like this deal because it makes them a worse team today, but it puts their organization in a better position for the future which is exactly what they should be worrying about. Obviously trading players that are already developed and in the majors for prospects is going to be a risk, but that doesn't make it an awful trade. For what it's worth, here's Keith Law's take on it from a chat today: Keith Law: Like it a lot for Pittsburgh - Morton could go right in their rotation, Gorkys is a ++ defender with a chance to hit (he hasn't been good this year but he's also 21 in AA), Locke is a high-upside LHP with three pitches who has shown good feel and command in the past. That's a lot of talent - and difficult-to-get talent, since players up the middle and LHP are hard to acquire in trade or free agency - for a guy who is, what, an average outfielder? Fringe-average? Since 6/1/08 McLouth has hit .256/.327/.447 if you exclude his 7 IBB, and he's not good in CF. Edited June 5, 2009 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 08:28 PM) Any chance we'll see Danks before the year's out? Buddy Bell's been talking about the kid being major league ready. We could see a promotion to Charlotte by the end of the year. Edited June 5, 2009 by Thunderbolt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 MMclouth is an overrated defensive player with a decent bat. The Pirates were not actively shopping him, the Braves approached them, and “blew them out of the water.” I imagine KW has more important things on his mind. I've always hoped in the back of my mind we'd get McLouth. You are probably right that it's because Danks is coming soon. But cf is what we need and he was there for the taking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 I think McLouth is getting to much bashing on here. He isn't this superstar player some in the media make him out to be, but he's a good, solid player. He isn't a stud in CF and not GG caliber, but he's decent. He has very good speed and can steal about 20-30 bags a year. Also, he's got good pop and run producing ability and he can knock 20+ homers, get a lot of doubles, and drive in a good amount (depending on where he's batting in the lineup). Superstar? No, but a very solid player. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 11:55 PM) I think McLouth is getting to much bashing on here. He isn't this superstar player some in the media make him out to be, but he's a good, solid player. He isn't a stud in CF and not GG caliber, but he's decent. He has very good speed and can steal about 20-30 bags a year. Also, he's got good pop and run producing ability and he can knock 20+ homers, get a lot of doubles, and drive in a good amount (depending on where he's batting in the lineup). Superstar? No, but a very solid player. I don't think anyone is denying that he's a solid player (.800-.810 OPS with slightly below average defense), but he's certainly incredibly overrated (especially by Pirates fans) and not worth a package of our top prospects. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 I knew this thread was coming. Good work@Felix. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boejouma Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 i would have been upset had we acquired him Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 Im not overly impressed with any of the prospects the Pirates got for McLouth, I dont think any of them end up being impact players in the majors at all. The one who might seems to be Locke, but Gorky's to me looks like a 4th OF and the 3rd guy has stunk in the majors already. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted June 5, 2009 Share Posted June 5, 2009 If you wanted a comparable package, on possibly the low-end, it's probably something along the lines of Poreda, Shelby, and Hudson. Just gonna throw that out there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.