Rex Kickass Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 01:23 PM) A few of my carrier pigeons have been intercepted on occasion. Don't even get me started on how much data I've had compromised with semaphore flags. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted June 27, 2009 Share Posted June 27, 2009 Aldis lamps, FTW! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted June 27, 2009 Author Share Posted June 27, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (BearSox @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 11:47 AM) lol, what? The e-mails came from his personal e-mail account. Either someone hacked into his account or he left the computer on and someone jumped on. And the newspaper got it from an annoynmos source over 2 months ago. Michael Savage's theory of the DHS or NSA accessing his e-mails isn't that crazy. Why wouldn't Obama want to eliminate his opponents one by one. I'm not saying that's the case, but the conspiracy theorist inside me kinda believes it. It kind of is. First off any career intelligence specialist (remember, the vast majority of personnel are not political appointees and have no loyalty to parties except for when they vote) is going to know immediately that an order to do so is WAY over the line of what's ethical and legal, and someone would leak it to the Washington Post or the New York Times (or Breitbart, or whatever, hell). Secondly if you get caught doing it, you're done and you can consider yourself lucky if you don't end up in a federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison. Edited June 27, 2009 by lostfan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 26, 2009 -> 08:26 PM) Before it really started, sure. Because no one else would report it when he was really in the race. They just left it alone in the tabloids. That is kinda their point. The counter to this is how much money should the legit press spend chasing down Enquirer stories? I would be a bit concerned if, for example, the NY Times reprinted, or used as a source, an Enquirer article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 10:47 AM) lol, what? The e-mails came from his personal e-mail account. Either someone hacked into his account or he left the computer on and someone jumped on. And the newspaper got it from an annoynmos source over 2 months ago. Michael Savage's theory of the DHS or NSA accessing his e-mails isn't that crazy. Why wouldn't Obama want to eliminate his opponents one by one. I'm not saying that's the case, but the conspiracy theorist inside me kinda believes it. Or she left her computer on. Or she told a friend who jumped on her computer and forwarded them. Lewinski was discovered by her telling a co-worker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FlaSoxxJim Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 QUOTE (mr_genius @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 01:18 PM) top secret notes written on paper airplane is worse. it's burned me a few times. QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 01:23 PM) A few of my carrier pigeons have been intercepted on occasion. QUOTE (Rex Kicka** @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 01:41 PM) Don't even get me started on how much data I've had compromised with semaphore flags. QUOTE (knightni @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 01:49 PM) Aldis lamps, FTW! :lolhitting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nixon Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jun 27, 2009 -> 11:47 AM) Michael Savage's theory of the DHS or NSA accessing his e-mails isn't that crazy. Why wouldn't Obama want to eliminate his opponents one by one. I'm not saying that's the case, but the conspiracy theorist inside me kinda believes it. Err, how about his PISSED OFF WIFE sending the e-mails out? Not to mention any IT admin that maintains the servers at his building could be reading that stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted June 29, 2009 Author Share Posted June 29, 2009 QUOTE (Nixon @ Jun 29, 2009 -> 03:51 PM) Err, how about his PISSED OFF WIFE sending the e-mails out? Not to mention any IT admin that maintains the servers at his building could be reading that stuff. The one who said "his career is not my concern?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted June 29, 2009 Share Posted June 29, 2009 I wonder if there is a stat on how many times the Enquirer ends up being right? I mean, they pay for stories, so who's to say someone who needs some extra cash wouldn't leak a story. If it ends up being wrong, Whoops...it's the Enquirer. But if it ends up being right, the "mainstream media" will end up running with it. Either way, the Enquirer gets it's readers. Win-win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 So now, he's saying there were further daliances with this Brazilian woman, and that he also "crossed the line" with other women as well. This really is like a slow motion train wreck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 Are they planning to impeach him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 But the governor claims he wanted to end the affair in person and, with his wife's permission, went to New York with a "trusted spiritual adviser" serving as chaperone. The three went to church and dinner together and parted ways the same night. Workin' the three-way governor, nicely played, and he even received his wife's permission. Wow. I like the toss in Church angle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jun 30, 2009 -> 02:02 PM) So now, he's saying there were further daliances with this Brazilian woman, and that he also "crossed the line" with other women as well. This really is like a slow motion train wreck. What a douche... During an emotional interview at his Statehouse office with The Associated Press on Tuesday, Sanford said Chapur is his soul mate but he's trying to fall back in love with his wife. If I were his wife, I'd be like, "Gee...thanks." And then I'd kick him square in the twig and berries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 Funny that he was all up in arms during the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jun 30, 2009 -> 12:02 PM) So now, he's saying there were further daliances with this Brazilian woman, and that he also "crossed the line" with other women as well. This really is like a slow motion train wreck. He's also saying that the affair(s) have gone on since at least 2001. Clearly, they began after Sanford was broken hearted about that Obama dude not being allowed inside the Dem convention in 2000. Everytime anything happens to Obama, good or bad, Sanford's heart just breaks and he seeks the comfort of another woman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 30, 2009 -> 08:14 PM) He's also saying that the affair(s) have gone on since at least 2001. Clearly, they began after Sanford was broken hearted about that Obama dude not being allowed inside the Dem convention in 2000. Everytime anything happens to Obama, good or bad, Sanford's heart just breaks and he seeks the comfort of another woman. awesome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted June 30, 2009 Share Posted June 30, 2009 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 30, 2009 -> 02:14 PM) Funny that he was all up in arms during the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal. Of course, he wasn't getting any until Clinton left Washington. It was like following Bartolo Colon through a buffet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 1, 2009 Share Posted July 1, 2009 Here's a sure sign this guy won't be in office for long. South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford has backed out of a promise to release personal financial records proving he did not use state money for trips to see his mistress. A day after Sanford declared in an emotional Associated Press interview that his mistress is his soul mate, spokesman Joel Sawyer says the governor does not want to discuss personal matters in the media anymore. The state is investigating Sanford's travel to see the Argentine woman the governor identified as his lover. Sanford agreed this week to provide the AP with proof of his payment for trips to New York and Argentina to see her. His staff first said the records might be made available Tuesday, and then the governor's spokesman said Wednesday Sanford would not release them. How much you want to bet that the state's lawmakers are going to subpoena those records and they won't be kind to the governor? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted July 1, 2009 Author Share Posted July 1, 2009 QUOTE (Texsox @ Jun 30, 2009 -> 04:51 PM) Of course, he wasn't getting any until Clinton left Washington. It was like following Bartolo Colon through a buffet I didn't see this before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 QUOTE (lostfan @ Jul 1, 2009 -> 06:30 PM) I didn't see this before Thank you. Dammit, I thought it was my funniest post of 2009. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 You know what's really f'ed up about this is how he keeps going to the press to talk about more encounters, women, bulls***, the whole nine yards. And it occured to me why: this asshole is trying to throw s*** back at his wife. It's nothing more then that, it can't be. This guy is the biggest piece of s*** a man can be. Someone needs to neuter this asshole so he can lose his ability to "love" ever again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jul 1, 2009 -> 10:54 PM) You know what's really f'ed up about this is how he keeps going to the press to talk about more encounters, women, bulls***, the whole nine yards. And it occured to me why: this asshole is trying to throw s*** back at his wife. It's nothing more then that, it can't be. This guy is the biggest piece of s*** a man can be. Someone needs to neuter this asshole so he can lose his ability to "love" ever again. Sanford = Douche. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 Nobody's considering the possibility that his wife could be a giant c***. The continued god angle is pretty funny though: "God is testing me by putting all these beautiful South American women on the planet that I have to fly a few thousand miles to get to." I mean, the whole God Squad thing got pretty well exposed as a farce when we all found out you were f***ing pretty much every women you saw BUT your wife... is there any point in keeping it up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 QUOTE (DukeNukeEm @ Jul 2, 2009 -> 03:16 AM) Nobody's considering the possibility that his wife could be a giant c***. The continued god angle is pretty funny though: "God is testing me by putting all these beautiful South American women on the planet that I have to fly a few thousand miles to get to." I mean, the whole God Squad thing got pretty well exposed as a farce when we all found out you were f***ing pretty much every women you saw BUT your wife... is there any point in keeping it up? Then divorce her, don't take the d-bag way out and cheat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted July 2, 2009 Share Posted July 2, 2009 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jul 2, 2009 -> 09:42 AM) Then divorce her, don't take the d-bag way out and cheat. Guy says "I think we should see other people" Guy means "I've been seeing this other woman and I'm dumping you" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts