Jenksismyhero Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 Meh. Not worth the hype. They should have denied it was her and moved on, especially since it's been around for 4 months already. Instead they created a firestorm (intentional?). I've never understood the fascination with her. She's hot, no denying that, but in 5 seconds I can find 500 hotter women doing very nasty things. Is it her "realness" versus the porno plastic look that people like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 Not bad... not bad at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 09:57 AM) Meh. Not worth the hype. They should have denied it was her and moved on, especially since it's been around for 4 months already. Instead they created a firestorm (intentional?). I've never understood the fascination with her. She's hot, no denying that, but in 5 seconds I can find 500 hotter women doing very nasty things. Is it her "realness" versus the porno plastic look that people like? I was saying the exact same thing in the chat yesterday. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (SleepyWhiteSox @ Jul 18, 2009 -> 09:20 PM) Haven't seen it, but she's definitely overrated. I like big butts and I cannot lie... Pam Oliver has a pretty big one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 10:18 AM) I was saying the exact same thing in the chat yesterday. Its her realness and the fact that she's in sports. Sports+hot women=boner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan101 Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (SHIPPS @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 08:19 AM) I love how all the PC guys try to act like they are disgusted by this. Give me a break. I'm not disgusted by the fact there is a nude tape of her out there, I'm disgusted at how the tape was acquired. I can't imagine how anybody would not be disgusted by the idea of some weirdo secretly taping them without clothes on through a peephole and then putting it out there for all to see. It's about as much a case of invasion of privacy (and stalking for that matter, how else would the guy know where she is staying?) that you are going to come across. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 This really seems like a setup job. Come on, either some dude stood outside her hotel room for an hour waiting for the right time, or he was tipped to when she would be conveniently getting dressed/walking around naked right in front of her hotel door. I'm calling a setup... she wanted this to happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 It's not the door. Someone apparently drilled a hole into her room. Least that's what the radio said. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (SHIPPS @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 08:19 AM) I love how all the PC guys try to act like they are disgusted by this. Give me a break. So the fact that this act was illegal...you'd like to see a society where that sort of law is done away with? There's a difference between thinking it's 'gross' and thinking it's a huge invasion of someone's privacy, that you wouldnt want done unto you or your family member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipps Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (Princess Dye @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 01:14 PM) So the fact that this act was illegal...you'd like to see a society where that sort of law is done away with? There's a difference between thinking it's 'gross' and thinking it's a huge invasion of someone's privacy, that you wouldnt want done unto you or your family member. Where did I say that I want the law done away with? I think it is weird and I think it is wrong. Maury Povich has a show dedicated to talking about cases when women have been "peeped" on. And you know what his show does? They reinact it with hot chicks and create the whole scene all over again because their viewers want to watch and get off on it. Vouyerism is a huge part of our society's make up wether you want to believe that or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (SHIPPS @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 01:24 PM) Where did I say that I want the law done away with? I think it is weird and I think it is wrong. Maury Povich has a show dedicated to talking about cases when women have been "peeped" on. And you know what his show does? They reinact it with hot chicks and create the whole scene all over again because their viewers want to watch and get off on it. Vouyerism is a huge part of our society's make up wether you want to believe that or not. This is confusing to me, because you're saying "PC" people are lying who say they disapprove of it. Meaning there's something 'natural' in men to want to see this. Why cant there be people principled enough who can say 'yea i think she's hot...but no i'm not interested in watching it because it was done without her consent.' You have to remember, this isnt exactly a playboy shoot or anything. it was taken completely without her knowledge and that's the part people find sick. I definitely agree with you that voyeurism is part of the culture, but if you're saying every guy who's against it is lying, that's a huge leap IMO. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 12:55 PM) It's not the door. Someone apparently drilled a hole into her room. Least that's what the radio said. That couldn't have been from the door... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 I wouldn't mind watching the video. Obviously only to decipher if it is fake/real and setup/not. That's the only reason I'd watch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 03:44 PM) I wouldn't mind watching the video. Obviously only to decipher if it is fake/real and setup/not. That's the only reason I'd watch. riiiiiiight video is WAY over rated from what I have read. Am i right in hearing that it isnt even a "Sex tape" as many have called it? THought i read it's more like her just walking around naked. Edited July 21, 2009 by Athomeboy_2000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 03:45 PM) riiiiiiight video is WAY over rated from what I have read. Am i right in hearing that it isnt even a "Sex tape" as many have called it? THought i read it's more like her just walking around naked. I never heard a thing about it being a sex tape. I thought she was just doing her hair naked? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 21, 2009 Share Posted July 21, 2009 QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 03:51 PM) I never heard a thing about it being a sex tape. I thought she was just doing her hair naked? The first reports were "sex tape". But I've heard what you said, naked doing her hair. BORING!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DrunkBomber Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 Does anyone want the link? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 QUOTE (DrunkBomber @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 08:34 PM) Does anyone want the link? Do it via PM if you decide to do it. Viruses beware. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperSteve Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 09:57 AM) Meh. Not worth the hype. They should have denied it was her and moved on, especially since it's been around for 4 months already. Instead they created a firestorm (intentional?). I've never understood the fascination with her. She's hot, no denying that, but in 5 seconds I can find 500 hotter women doing very nasty things. Is it her "realness" versus the porno plastic look that people like? I personally really like her. Realness is a part of it. She's a normal girl pretty much. Plus I've seen her for how long on ESPN now. I'd rather see her naked than pretty much any of those porno chicks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 QUOTE (SuperSteve @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 09:48 PM) I personally really like her. Realness is a part of it. She's a normal girl pretty much. Plus I've seen her for how long on ESPN now. I'd rather see her naked than pretty much any of those porno chicks. But, would you rather see Erin Andrews just walking around topless or a porno chick getting ____ed by 3 or 4 ____s while ____ing her ____ with a ____? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted July 22, 2009 Share Posted July 22, 2009 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 10:30 PM) But, would you rather see Erin Andrews just walking around topless or a porno chick getting ____ed by 3 or 4 ____s while ____ing her ____ with a ____? Lol, I love the options available there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reddy Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Jul 22, 2009 -> 10:06 AM) Lol, I love the options available there. it's like a madlib. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Jul 21, 2009 -> 11:30 PM) But, would you rather see Erin Andrews just walking around topless or a porno chick getting "chees"ed by 3 or 4 "elephant"s while "rubb"ing her "car" with a "cat"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 Mad Libs!!! 1. (Past Tense Verb) 2. (Plural Noun) 3. (Present Verb) 4. (Noun) 5. (Noun) But, would you rather see Erin Andrews just walking around topless or a porno chick getting __1__ed by 3 or 4 __2__s while __3__ her __4__ with a __5__? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Posted July 23, 2009 Share Posted July 23, 2009 QUOTE (Brian @ Jul 23, 2009 -> 07:16 AM) Mad Libs!!! 1. (Past Tense Verb)=Blended 2. (Plural Noun)=Protein Bars 3. (Present Verb)=Driving 4. (Noun)=fridge 5. (Noun)=painting But, would you rather see Erin Andrews just walking around topless or a porno chick getting BLENDED by 3 or 4 PROTEIN BARS while DRIVING her FRIDGE with a PAINTING? Lame by me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.