NorthSideSox72 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 A lot of the content in the weekly mail bag is obvious, but there are some interesting tidbits and some hints if you read between the lines... on Dan Hudson, apparently was a potential part of the Peavy deal... Q: Daniel Hudson has been dominant at 3 different levels in the minors. Would the Sox consider using him if Richard continues to fail or even for a spot start (maybe the double header with Detroit)? -- Grant A: Not yet. He's made a nice climb. I know San Diego scouted him as part of the failed Jake Peavy trade. There are a few pitchers ahead of him, but the Sox aren't afraid to vault players from Double-A to the majors. When asked about prospects, interesting note on Nunez... There's an intriguing reliver at Triple-A Charlotte in Jhonny Nunez, who could be the successor to Bobby Jenks. When asked about Beckham's defensive issues... Maybe a backup infielder who has pinch-hitting experience can help the roster. Sometimes Gonzales hears things he can't repeat verbatim, but hints at them in articles like this. I'm starting to think its more and more likely that we go after Teahen, and probably move a minor league pitcher or two to accomplish that. More at the link. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BearSox Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 (edited) I wonder if the hype around Nunez is warranted, or if he's another Nick Massett. Edited July 14, 2009 by BearSox Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigruss Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 Im pretty sure JPN was never impressed with his stuff at AA. Maybe im wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 09:51 AM) I wonder if the hype around Nunez is warranted, or if he's another Nick Massett. I wasn't impressed when I saw him. Very similar delivery to Dotel, imo. Good fastball but I saw zero secondary stuff. But he does have plus velocity. I know the Sox scouts were high on him though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 12:17 PM) I wasn't impressed when I saw him. Very similar delivery to Dotel, imo. Good fastball but I saw zero secondary stuff. But he does have plus velocity. I know the Sox scouts were high on him though. As a closer all you need is that secondary pitch. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPN366 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (bigruss22 @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 11:59 AM) Im pretty sure JPN was never impressed with his stuff at AA. Maybe im wrong. I wasn't impressed, but he did pitch well and the numbers don't lie. He deserved the promotion. He didn't strike me as spectacular, but that really doesn't mean much. He was always used in long/middle relief, so I'm not sure how he would do as a closer. Edited July 14, 2009 by JPN366 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted July 14, 2009 Author Share Posted July 14, 2009 I guess my question is, if Nunez is closer material, why is Link still the closer in Charlotte? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (BearSox @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 11:51 AM) I wonder if the hype around Nunez is warranted, or if he's another Nick Massett. The Nick Massett who owns a 2.29 ERA and .91 WHIP this year with only 1 HR given up in a hitters park? After we traded him he put up a 2.08 ERA as well in 2008. He wasnt all hype. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 05:46 PM) The Nick Massett who owns a 2.29 ERA and .91 WHIP this year with only 1 HR given up in a hitters park? After we traded him he put up a 2.08 ERA as well in 2008. He wasnt all hype. Cooper's philosophy of less velocity and more command works with a lot of guys. Nick isn't one of them, as he's airing it out for the Reds and throws some pretty filthy stuff. His fastball is in the 95 mph range with a lot of movement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 12:47 PM) Cooper's philosophy of less velocity and more command works with a lot of guys. Nick isn't one of them, as he's airing it out for the Reds and throws some pretty filthy stuff. His fastball is in the 95 mph range with a lot of movement. The Coop method seems to save arms. The Dusty method shreds them Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 I'm not surprised other teams are looking at him. We are looking pretty hard at him, it would be hard to imagine other teams want to see if he is as good as his numbers would indicate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 I was sad to give Massett away for a brief rental of Griffey Jr. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (Swingandalongonetoleft @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 03:24 PM) I was sad to give Massett away for a brief rental of Griffey Jr. I saw Massett at Miller Park earlier this year. He looked unreal in striking out Prince and Braun back to back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RME JICO Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 It is surprising to see guys like Masset, MacDougal, and Aardsma actually doing good. I thought they were all pretty much done when they left the Sox. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (Swingandalongonetoleft @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 03:24 PM) I was sad to give Massett away for a brief rental of Griffey Jr. I would be moreso, but it turned out to kind of work out after CQ got hurt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 05:55 PM) I would be moreso, but it turned out to kind of work out after CQ got hurt. I’m actually proud from a fan perspective to say that Ken Griffey JR played for my team. He wasn’t great, but he’s wasn’t awful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
103 mph screwball Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 QUOTE (RME JICO @ Jul 14, 2009 -> 04:16 PM) It is surprising to see guys like Masset, MacDougal, and Aardsma actually doing good. I thought they were all pretty much done when they left the Sox. I hope the Sox and Coop are paying attention to that fact so that they understand that maybe everyone does not fit the standard plan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted July 14, 2009 Share Posted July 14, 2009 Well, according to Cooper, Aardsma and Sisco refused to work with him and the organization on their offspeed stuff...so they basically cut them loose. We tried MANY times with MacDougal, maybe he just needed a change of scenery and to pitch in a low-stress environment like Kip Wells did, or similar to KC, without any scrutiny by the media. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.