ILMOU Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 12:20 PM) I think there's a good chance the steroid era started well before anyone has realized it. BTW, did you ever hear the story about Pud Galvin? (great name for a rock band, but I digress) He was baseball's first 300 game winner and a HOF pitcher. He, allegedly, injected himself with monkey testosterone before starts in 1899. Now there's a visionary for you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Brian @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 01:11 PM) ESPN cries. I've suspected Kevin Millar back then as well. Damon? Me too. He was never the same after that year. Damon is a good bet too. QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 01:13 PM) I'd be shocked if Kent was clean, frankly. Innocent until proven guilty is a nice ideal, but rather unrealistic in this toxic environment. The news on Papi is the biggest non-surprise of the year. The man has the largest skull I've ever seen. It wasn't that big when he was a Twinkie. The revelations about Manny were much more surprising to me, personally, because he put up great numbers prior even to the dawn of the so-called steroid era. I now believe he was one of the "pioneers", relatively speaking. I honestly could go either way on Kent, but I will wait until there's actually solid evidence. A guy who's such a strong advocate against steroids(probably as much as Frank was) has to be proven to me. Honestly, I always thought Manny was one of the big ones simply because in 1996, he was such a good hitter, but he wasn't anywhere as huge as he is now. And that whole baggy jersey thing just covered the fact. QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 01:17 PM) Another thing I'd really like to know is how and why these names are being leaked, who's doing the leaking, and why they're being leaked one by one. My conjecture is that the leaker or leakers are being paid - HANDSOMELY - and that there's more money in it for them by doing it this way. Some dirty dealing is going on, that's for certain. Probably because of the money. I thought I read somewhere on RealGM though that these two names were leaked via various lawyers who were part of the process. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hammerhead johnson Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 07:17 PM) My conjecture is that the leaker or leakers are being paid - HANDSOMELY - and that there's more money in it for them by doing it this way. Well yeah, of course it's money-motivated. It doesn't make much sense to release the entire list all at once. The next guy that says DURRRR THEY NEED TO RELEASE TEH ENTIRE LIST RIGHT NOW THIS IS BS!!!!!!!!!!!! should be tied down and beaten with soap on a rope. I know it sounds harsh, but I wouldn't have it any other way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 01:17 PM) Another thing I'd really like to know is how and why these names are being leaked, who's doing the leaking, and why they're being leaked one by one. My conjecture is that the leaker or leakers are being paid - HANDSOMELY - and that there's more money in it for them by doing it this way. Some dirty dealing is going on, that's for certain. So what if they are? It doesn't take away from the fact that Ortiz tested positive for steroids. It almost seems like you're pulling the line so often connected with players when they're names are released, and that's attacking the messenger or their motivations for releasing information rather than the person them self. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Nice job Ortiz, way to join the Palmeiro side of the steroid argument. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 02:07 PM) Agreed. You can't put guys there just because you think they took steroids. It's like someone saying they think Frank Thomas juiced and add him to a list. They have as much credibility as you. I don't remember Bagwell being linked, but he may have. Does anyone remember? I only put Bagwell and Kent there b/c I could have sworn people linking them in the past. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpd9189 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (ChiSox_Sonix @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 02:20 PM) I only put Bagwell and Kent there b/c I could have sworn people linking them in the past. Just release the whole list so we can move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 (edited) QUOTE (dpd9189 @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 02:24 PM) Just release the whole list so we can move on. Personally, I enjoy the long, agonizing wait. It'd be even funnier if they released one name, once a week, to make sure they grab the headlines. You group them all together, as others have pointed out, it takes away from the circus. Some will escape criticism. If it were me, I'd purposely release the name of a player who had a good week. Or even better, wait until a team is in the World Series, THEN release a few names. Anything to make people embarrassed. Hell, it's not even that I care about steroids or HGH -- I just love watching people complain in baseball. Edited July 30, 2009 by Flash Tizzle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILMOU Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 01:11 PM) So what if they are? It doesn't take away from the fact that Ortiz tested positive for steroids. It almost seems like you're pulling the line so often connected with players when they're names are released, and that's attacking the messenger or their motivations for releasing information rather than the person them self. Not my intention - you're jumping to conclusions, Flash. You won't find me apologizing for any of these guys. I wouldn't vote any of them into the Hall. That doesn't change the fact that when these guys gave up their pee, they were promised anonymity in the results. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Stan Bahnsen @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 02:37 PM) Not my intention - you're jumping to conclusions, Flash. You won't find me apologizing for any of these guys. I wouldn't vote any of them into the Hall. That doesn't change the fact that when these guys gave up their pee, they were promised anonymity in the results. This is what gets me...now that some names have been leaked, might as well dump the whole thing (sorry Hammerhead, it's all or nothing in this case). And if I were the players, I would consider re-orging the MLBPA. I know Fehr is leaving/left, but I would be pissed. So what if Congress wanted the list...fight! That's what you do, you're a union. Take it to court. Cuz they had to know, once it's in government, it isn't safe. Certainly isn't a matter of National security. I say boo to baseball, the MLBPA and Congress on this one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallyburger Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 (edited) Maybe Manny's lack of humility and his clown act during his 50 game suspension had something to do with the timing of this one. That traveling minor league road show he participated in had to pizzz a few off in the MLB office. May as well out Ortiz, since the 2 of them are inseparable and the guy was flat out lying to the media and fans. Edited July 30, 2009 by wallyburger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyho7476 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 I love when when the Red Sox image gets tainted. Hate em. Big Sloppy sucks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (CanOfCorn @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 12:40 PM) This is what gets me...now that some names have been leaked, might as well dump the whole thing (sorry Hammerhead, it's all or nothing in this case). And if I were the players, I would consider re-orging the MLBPA. I know Fehr is leaving/left, but I would be pissed. So what if Congress wanted the list...fight! That's what you do, you're a union. Take it to court. Cuz they had to know, once it's in government, it isn't safe. Certainly isn't a matter of National security. I say boo to baseball, the MLBPA and Congress on this one. The lists were seized under a legal search warrant associated with the BALCO case. The Feds had every right to take it. Just like everyone on it has the right to sue the feds if their name is on the list and it leaks that their name is on the list. The problem? You don't have a case unless your name is actually on that list. Thus...filing the lawsuit is tantamount to an admission of steroid abuse. The problem here is not that the list is being leaked slowly, or embarrassing people...the problem is...baseball had a huge steroid problem for years and 103 or so of its players were stupid enough to be caught when they had a 6 month warning that testing was coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 03:42 PM) The lists were seized under a legal search warrant associated with the BALCO case. The Feds had every right to take it. Just like everyone on it has the right to sue the feds if their name is on the list and it leaks that their name is on the list. The problem? You don't have a case unless your name is actually on that list. Thus...filing the lawsuit is tantamount to an admission of steroid abuse. The problem here is not that the list is being leaked slowly, or embarrassing people...the problem is...baseball had a huge steroid problem for years and 103 or so of its players were stupid enough to be caught when they had a 6 month warning that testing was coming. It depends what the list consists of. If the actual list that was seized was an entire list of everybody that got tested, either negative or positive, the union could make an argument that the negative players can file a lawsuit to prevent it from being released since they took the test with promise of privacy. Now, obviously there's some flaws with my theory. You have to convince players who tested negative to go along with it and there's obviously legal attacks that can be made against that, but just trying to be creative here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 Ha, ESPN all of the sudden is happy to state that all teams had players who were on steroids and that these players' names coming out is unfair. So comical. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCSox Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 09:40 AM) So you're saying he didn't starting putting up Hall of Fame numbers for a period of time because he simply changed his hitting philosophy? LOL, just like Luis Gonzalez's "I just started trying to pull the ball" excuse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 05:00 PM) Ha, ESPN all of the sudden is happy to state that all teams had players who were on steroids and that these players' names coming out is unfair. So comical. yeah, they're doing the same thing about the '04 and '07 champs, saying that everyone had tainted players then Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 30, 2009 Share Posted July 30, 2009 QUOTE (Flash Tizzle @ Jul 30, 2009 -> 02:28 PM) Personally, I enjoy the long, agonizing wait. It'd be even funnier if they released one name, once a week, to make sure they grab the headlines. You group them all together, as others have pointed out, it takes away from the circus. Some will escape criticism. If it were me, I'd purposely release the name of a player who had a good week. Or even better, wait until a team is in the World Series, THEN release a few names. Anything to make people embarrassed. Hell, it's not even that I care about steroids or HGH -- I just love watching people complain in baseball. Its the perfect payback for the game that purposefully drug its feet while gaining all of the benefits of this crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallyburger Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 I actually heard an out of town sports talking heads show panel say, "steroids saved baseball" after the fans quit the game because of the strike. I can see the logic, but they thought that was the overwhelming positive aspect of steroids. All, I could think was, Wow that is screwed up if that was the reason to accept steroid and HGH use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 So, what is the list of juicers who have been to be confirmed on the 2003 list? I remember Sosa, ARod, and now the duo. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buehrle>Wood Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 Grimsley and Segui I believe are the other two names to come out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 Canseco now saying a Hall of Famer was on PEDs Hate to continue to feed the ego on this douche, but he's somehow became a saint lately. 7 HOF teammates of Canseco's.. Reggie Jackson Wade Boggs Don Sutton Nolan Ryan Rickey Henderson Rich Gossage Dennis Eckersley Since he's saying this now, ima go out on a limb and say it was Rickey Henderson but that's pure speculation on my part. Though Rickey would probably tell me that Rickey don't do steroids, Rickey is a clean player, and Rickey got all of Rickey's stats the natural way cause he's the greatest of all time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swingandalongonetoleft Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 (edited) A tree could have told you that Ortiz was cheating. I felt badly when the Yanks lost to the SawRx in 2004. Not only did it spawn terrible unspeakable s*** such as Fever Pitch, but it also offered all a glimpse as to what will happen when miserable, miserable cutesy loser franchises finally chance upon a World Championship. You will never hear the end of it. I hate that this has happened to baseball, but I'm also glad that Jimmy Fallon's movie can be further questioned and disregarded. The PED SawRx were a slightly more successful, less bumblef*** version of the Cubs until 2004. A pill here and there, two buddies jabbing each other in the ass with needles, and all of a sudden you have the most nauseating World Series Champions in forever. You couldn't hide in an Afghani cave from it. The only thing magical about the PED SawRx winning in 2004 and 2007 is that everyone chose to ignore the fact that Papi's head was comparable to a small hot air balloon, and that human beings were able to develop artificial means of achieving endurance and strength. Both are remarkable. On a side note, IIRC, and if I'm wrong correct me, wasn't Damon's name also associated with PED's at one point? I could have sworn that there was at least the briefest mention somewhere along the line. I've never read, but anticipate Curt Schilling's thoughts on all this craziness and tomfoolery in his blog. I'm literally putting down a Dostojevsky novel right now in anticipation. It's a shame for MLB. A full blown enema of the 104 who tested positive would suit the league far better than this steady drip drip that keeps you up all night. Sooner or later (with 'later' being a bad, bad thing for MLB) these names are going to surface. Edited July 31, 2009 by Swingandalongonetoleft Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wallyburger Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 This unofficial "official leaked list" is making the rounds of the "net". Absolutely no validation , but plenty of no surprises if it is authentic. 1.Nomar Garciaparra 2.Manny Ramirez 3.Johnny Damon 4.Trot Nixon 5.David Ortiz 6.Shea Hillenbrand 7.Derek Lowe 8.Pedro Martinez 9.Brian Roberts 10.Jay Gibbons 11.Melvin Mora 12.Jerry Hairston 13.Jason Giambi 14.Alfonso Soriano 15.Raul Mondesi 16. Aaron Boone 17.Andy Pettitte 18.Jose Contreras 19.Roger Clemens 20.Carlos Delgado 21.Vernon Wells 22.Frank Catalanotto 23.Kenny Rogers 24.Magglio Ordonez 25.Sandy Alomar 26.Bartolo Colon 27.Brent Abernathy 28.Jose Lima 29.Milton Bradley 30.Casey Blake 31.Danys Baez 32.Craig Monroe 33.Dmitri Young 34.Alex Sanchez 35.Eric Chavez 36.Miguel Tejada 37.Eric Byrnes 38.Jose Guillen 39.Keith Foulke 40.Ricardo Rincon 41.Bret Boone 42.Mike Cameron 43.Randy Winn 44.Ryan Franklin 45.Freddy Garcia 46.Rafael Soriano 47.Scott Spiezio 48.Troy Glaus 49.Francisco Rodriguez 50.Ben Weber 51.Alex Rodriguez 52.Juan Gonzalez 53.Rafael Palmeiro 54.Carl Everett 55.Javy Lopez 56.Gary Sheffield 57.Mike Hampton 58.Ivan Rodriguez 59.Derrek Lee 60.Bobby Abreu 61.Terry Adams 62.Fernando Tatis 63.Livan Hernandez 64.Hector Almonte 65.Tony Armas 66.Dan Smith 67.Roberto Alomar 68.Cliff Floyd 69.Roger Cedeno 70.Jeromy Burnitz 71.Moises Alou 72.Sammy Sosa 73.Corey Patterson 74.Carlos Zambrano 75.Mark Prior 76.Kerry Wood 77.Matt Clement 78.Antonio Alfonseca 79.Juan Cruz 80.Aramis Ramirez 81.Craig Wilson 82.Kris Benson 83.Richie Sexson 84.Geoff Jenkins 85.Valerio de los Santos 86.Benito Santiago 87.Rich Aurilia 88.Barry Bonds 89.Andres Galarraga 90.Jason Schmidt 91.Felix Rodriguez 92.Jason Christiansen 93.Matt Herges 94.Paul Lo Duca 95.Shawn Green 96.Oliver Perez 97.Adrian Beltre 98.Eric Gagne 99.Guillermo Mota 100.Luis Gonzalez 101.Todd Helton 102.Ryan Klesko 103.Gary Matthews Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flash Tizzle Posted July 31, 2009 Share Posted July 31, 2009 (edited) LOL at the number of contributing 2004 Red Sox players on it. That World Series team is going to take a HUGE hit. It's really funny to me watching ESPN, and all their Sportscenter anchors practically begging MLBPA to release the names. Of course when it involves embarrassment to them, or their beloved Red Sox, they want it all out in the open as quickly as possible. I was watching ESPN News yesterday and one of the male anchors was practically losing it talking about how they keep releasing name after name, little by little. Again, I say let it trickle out slowly. Edited July 31, 2009 by Flash Tizzle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.