Flash Tizzle Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 CHANGE DANKS' DIAPER COOP! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 (edited) I really, really do not want to sign Chone Figgins next year. I cannot stand him. He's like that annoying cousin you have that chews and thinks he's the s***. Edited August 6, 2009 by iamshack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jphat007 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 maybe we do need to find somebody for Getz. holy s*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 woohoo!!! a scoreless inning for Danksy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Thank you, Aybar...a few more pitches and Figgins would've been on 3rd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capn12 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Danks is all over the place...c'mon, ONE sweep won't hurt you guys, I promise! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kane0730 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 QUOTE (iamshack @ Aug 6, 2009 -> 02:18 PM) I really, really do not want to sign Chone Figgins next year. I cannot stand him. He's like that annoying cousin you have that chews and thinks he's the s***. I'll take everyday over Pods, and twice on Sunday Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Not sure why Castro was looking to swing like that... Santana had walked the lead-off man the first three innings and threw Castro an obvious Ball 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan3530 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 wow that was a inning.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Nothing like an easy 1-2-3 to get a guy going Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kane0730 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 I'm trying to remember a worse defensive Sox team in recent memory. Anybody? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Princess Dye Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 i wonder how danks feels about having said 'no i dont want 15M' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kane0730 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Alright Danks. Need 2 more scoreless out of you. We're going to come back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 QUOTE (kane0730 @ Aug 6, 2009 -> 02:27 PM) Alright Danks. Need 2 more scoreless out of you. We're going to come back. Yes we are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Hook Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 (edited) Who was arguing the other day about picking Danks over Floyd to start the 3rd game of a playoff series? The 3-2 lockdown curve on Nix might turn out to be the pitch of the game. Danks just not pitching well...we have to leave him out there a little bit longer to try to work through his problems, but we also shouldn't let the lead get bigger than 3 either. CLE played well against the Twins and they're relaxed now with all the trades over, so they don't have pressure to do anything but be a spoiler. Those teams are always the most dangerous to contending teams. Edited August 6, 2009 by caulfield12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBigHurt Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 (edited) I don't care how bad Santana is, we aren't going to win if Danks keeps giving up longballs. Edited August 6, 2009 by TheBigHurt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soxfan3530 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 danks is not going to give them shot to come back in this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kane0730 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Brutal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 WHY IS HE STILL IN THE GAME??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 So why don't we ever show up for sweep opportunities? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aprec32 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 QUOTE (rockren @ Aug 6, 2009 -> 02:28 PM) Yes we are. I have a feeling that we will put up at least a 3 spot in the bottom of this inning.........just need to hold them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockren Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 QUOTE (aprec32 @ Aug 6, 2009 -> 02:29 PM) I have a feeling that we will put up at least a 3 spot in the bottom of this inning.........just need to hold them. I hope you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wise Master Buehrle Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 If there is one thing I really hate, it's inconsistent umpires. You're f***ing paid to be consistent, on top of your game. For f***ing f*** sake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caulfield12 Posted August 6, 2009 Share Posted August 6, 2009 Is this one of those "happily content to take 2/3" games where we just don't seem to have the burning/driving ambition to put our foot on the neck of the opponent and crush them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts