Jump to content

Financial News


jasonxctf

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 11:08 AM)
Granted it is limited, but with the information I have locally, small businesses aren't moving at all right now. They are still in lock down mode.

I've seen other posters here say otherwise, including jasonxctf, who seems to have access to better info than we do.

 

I'm not saying it makes sense, or that its something great - I just think its interesting that businesses are planning on growth in 2010.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 11:24 AM)
I've seen other posters here say otherwise, including jasonxctf, who seems to have access to better info than we do.

 

I'm not saying it makes sense, or that its something great - I just think its interesting that businesses are planning on growth in 2010.

 

Oh, I would say my local sources are pretty solid. How is personally interviewing mayor of my town for a source?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 12:20 PM)
Most aren't here, either. They don't want to get caught with their pants down on government interference.

Seriously, you think it's "Government interference" and not "my customers losing their jobs" that businesses are afraid of right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 01:05 PM)
Seriously, you think it's "Government interference" and not "my customers losing their jobs" that businesses are afraid of right now?

 

 

Why would their customers lose their jobs? Oh, because the government is "helping".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 02:55 PM)
:lolhitting

 

You know, that's a really good point. I might have to go apply there.

 

Don't bother unless you are a minority, a veteran, or disabled. But especially if you are a minority disabled veteran... So lostfan should be all over this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 04:14 PM)
I assume he meant that 90% of the value of the stock market would be lost and we'd enter a new dark age.

 

(Probably means 90% of the publicly traded stocks go down).

The latter makes sense. I was hinting about the former, which I'm sure he didn't mean.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link

On monetary policy, exiting too soon is going to tip the economies into recession; the trouble is… now there is the beginning of an asset bubble that's becoming global," Roubini told "Squawk Box Europe" at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.

 

In Asia and China real estate prices are rising too fast, as do stock prices if you look at the PE ratio, he explained.

 

His comments echoed earlier warnings by European Central Bank Governing Council member Ewald Nowotny that there is a concrete risk of asset bubbles in emerging markets and in some commodities.

 

James Chanos, president and founder of Kynikos Associates, also warned recently that the bubble in China's real estate market is "unprecedented."

 

...

Meanwhile, the "wall of liquidity" which is inflating the emerging markets assets bubble is chasing commodities as well, he warned.

 

A slowdown in growth in developed economies is likely to push stock prices lower, but he said he did not see them going below the levels reached during the crisis.

 

"I don't think we're going to retest the lows of last March … I see only a correction happening in the second half of last year," Roubini said. "The risk is that the policy stimulus is going to fizzle out in the second half of next year and it will become a drag on growth."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 26, 2010 -> 03:29 PM)
He turned 56 in December.

 

(one of these times, 2k5 is going to be wrong on something, I'm going to call him on it, then suddenly I'll mysteriously disappear. A few years later a body will be found in a swamp somewhere).

 

Either that or one of those friendly left wing groups is going to pay me a "visit".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Cknolls @ Jan 27, 2010 -> 12:39 PM)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0012701601.html

 

I know, I always point out negative news.

I've said for months, the best thing for the long term health of the housing market is for NEW home sales to stay weak, but existing home sales to be stronger. That's the only way we can reduce, relatively, the supply side, to support prices.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 27, 2010 -> 01:52 PM)
I've said for months, the best thing for the long term health of the housing market is for NEW home sales to stay weak, but existing home sales to be stronger. That's the only way we can reduce, relatively, the supply side, to support prices.

The Fed just released its monthly meeting notes today. Here's what the last couple have said about the housing market:

Jan, 2010: No comment.

 

Dec, 2009: "The housing sector has shown some signs of improvement over recent months."

 

Nov, 2009: "Activity in the housing sector has increased over recent months"

They took out the statement that the housing sector was improving and did not discuss it. That has to be deliberate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...