Wanne Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4601465 Also noticed at the bottom it said the Dodge have the most potential FAs with 16. Why on earth would you appoint your wife as an executive in the first place. Did McCourt get his money from her? What a mess this is gonna turn out to be? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 QUOTE (Wanne @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 12:10 PM) http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4601465 Also noticed at the bottom it said the Dodge have the most potential FAs with 16. Why on earth would you appoint your wife as an executive in the first place. Did McCourt get his money from her? What a mess this is gonna turn out to be? The eye-popper: She wants $321,000 a month in spousal support if reinstated to her former position. If not, she believes she should be paid nearly $488,000 per month. Seriously?!?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 thats just a small part of her demands, NSS. Check this out travel by private jet - 5 star hotel accommodations - travel expenses - Unlimited - business dinners 5 nights per week - business lunches 5 days per week - making Dodger Legends available for events without charge - access to team doctors for McCourt family members - access to the owner’s suite for Dodger home games and non-baseball events at the stadium - Tickets to All-Star games and playoff games — even if the Dodgers aren’t playing - a pass to all National League games Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 As Chris Rock says.. "I'm not saying he should've killer her, but I understand." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
witesoxfan Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 sounds like Rachel Phelps Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bschmaranz Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 QUOTE (witesoxfan @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 01:45 PM) sounds like Rachel Phelps This guy here is dead! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
longshot7 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 I support Jamie. She was the brains behind the operation anyway. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgeFabregas Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 Whose to say those perks weren't contractually included in the gig? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pants Rowland Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 QUOTE (bschmaranz @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 01:46 PM) This guy here is dead! Cross him off, then! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MHizzle85 Posted October 28, 2009 Share Posted October 28, 2009 I tried to think of something I could say here without catching a 3 day vacation from this lovely message board about Ms. McCourt. Here's what I got... women be trippin'. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R U Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 b****es be crazy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 QUOTE (JorgeFabregas @ Oct 28, 2009 -> 02:50 PM) Whose to say those perks weren't contractually included in the gig? I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:04 PM) I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. Depending on how long they have been married, and how much money they have made together, not to mention if there is a pre-nup, it might. If nothing precludes it, she is entitled to keep living her lifestyle in a lot of states. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted October 29, 2009 Share Posted October 29, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:04 PM) I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. Not unreasonable based on prior earnings, etc. As SS mentioned, she is entitled to maintain her current lifestyle. Basically the laws are written so that no human is held economically captive by another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 Don't s*** where you sleep. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JorgeFabregas Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 29, 2009 -> 04:04 PM) I'm pretty sure the marriage gig didn't contractually obligate $331-$448k per MONTH for the rest of her life. I am specifically referring to the baseball and travel-related perks possibly being part of the CEO gig. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 I'm pretty sure the saying is "Don't s*** where you eat," but that just might be how I've heard it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted October 30, 2009 Share Posted October 30, 2009 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Oct 30, 2009 -> 01:41 PM) I'm pretty sure the saying is "Don't s*** where you eat," but that just might be how I've heard it. Yep, that's the saying as I understand it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.