Jump to content

Curtis Granderson Anyone


RockRaines

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 57
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (KevinM @ Nov 13, 2009 -> 11:04 AM)
I would hope (for their sake) they would go Rivera/Granderson/Hunter left to right.

Yeah, but then they might offend the great Torii Hunter.

 

Hunter is the best CF in the history of the game! That's preposterous!

 

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 13, 2009 -> 11:07 AM)
Yeah, but then they might offend the great Torii Hunter.

 

Hunter is the best CF in the history of the game! That's preposterous!

 

;)

 

That's exactly what I was thinking. Torii's ego would be hurt if he (the 9x Gold Glover) would be asked to move from CF to RF. I don't see that happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For you sabermetrics guys, has Hunter ever profiled extremely well in regards to UZR?

 

I've always thought he just plays extremely deep and has an extraordinary talent for timing leaps to pull down potential home run balls. On the other side of that coin (as the great HAWK-eh-roo likes to say), seems like he has always let a crapload of singles drop because of that defensive positioning.

 

So I am just curious if he was always overrated, or just as he has gotten older and a step or so slower?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Nov 13, 2009 -> 06:30 PM)
For you sabermetrics guys, has Hunter ever profiled extremely well in regards to UZR?

 

I've always thought he just plays extremely deep and has an extraordinary talent for timing leaps to pull down potential home run balls. On the other side of that coin (as the great HAWK-eh-roo likes to say), seems like he has always let a crapload of singles drop because of that defensive positioning.

 

So I am just curious if he was always overrated, or just as he has gotten older and a step or so slower?

He was +13.2 in 2003 which is very good, but aside from that not really and he's a career -14.5 UZR (-2.1 per 150) although data only goes back to 2002.

 

He's also a combined +15 runs saved since 2004 going by Dewan's +/-.

 

Your point on his positioning is actually spot on according to his +/-, he scores very high on balls hit deep and he scores badly on shallow hit balls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Ozzie Ball @ Nov 13, 2009 -> 01:49 PM)
He was +13.2 in 2003 which is very good, but aside from that not really and he's a career -14.5 UZR (-2.1 per 150) although data only goes back to 2002.

 

He's also a combined +15 runs saved since 2004 going by Dewan's +/-.

 

Your point on his positioning is actually spot on according to his +/-, he scores very high on balls hit deep and he scores badly on shallow hit balls.

Ahh. good to know the stats do sometimes tell you what the eyes do indeed see...:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...