Kyyle23 Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/meast/12/29/...deos/index.html Are we witnessing another Iranian Revolution? This doesnt seem like it is stopping or going away any time soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 2, 2010 Share Posted January 2, 2010 They aren't accomplishing much until they get the military on their side. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 Obvious more CIA BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 3, 2010 Share Posted January 3, 2010 When the clerics are led out captured, dead, or fled from the country, then I will believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyyle23 Posted January 4, 2010 Author Share Posted January 4, 2010 QUOTE (CryptviLL @ Jan 3, 2010 -> 10:03 AM) Obvious more CIA BS I didnt peg you for the conspiracy theory tinfoil hat type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jan 3, 2010 -> 10:08 PM) I didnt peg you for the conspiracy theory tinfoil hat type Weird. He doesn't believe in the possibility of Iranian revolution, but fully believes in the reality of pro wrestling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 6, 2010 Share Posted January 6, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 5, 2010 -> 11:52 PM) Weird. He doesn't believe in the possibility of Iranian revolution, but fully believes in the reality of pro wrestling. QOTY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 Be careful what you wish for in regards to an Iranian revolution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSox05 Posted January 12, 2010 Share Posted January 12, 2010 QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Jan 3, 2010 -> 09:08 PM) I didnt peg you for the conspiracy theory tinfoil hat type Yeah because the CIA would never be involved in anything in Iran. Thats just crazy talk. The Shah of Iran says hi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 Weird. He doesn't believe in the possibility of Iranian revolution, but fully believes in the reality of pro wrestling. Mate - I can fully understand the reality and fakes of wrestling. It's just a hobby, comparing this is comparing apples to oranges. I didnt peg you for the conspiracy theory tinfoil hat type It's happened multiple times, what makes me believe anything I hear from this situation. After reading this article maybe you will change your mind: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...a&aid=15767 That is part 2 of an amazing 3 part series. After reading the history of that, how can you say what you said to me? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 QUOTE (CryptviLL @ Jan 20, 2010 -> 08:54 PM) Mate - I can fully understand the reality and fakes of wrestling. It's just a hobby, comparing this is comparing apples to oranges. It's happened multiple times, what makes me believe anything I hear from this situation. After reading this article maybe you will change your mind: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?con...a&aid=15767 That is part 2 of an amazing 3 part series. After reading the history of that, how can you say what you said to me? Oh goodie. The Trilateral Commission and the Bilderburgs. I think the defense rests on the "tinfoil hat" s***. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 The CIA really has f***ed around a lot in Iran though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 Oh goodie. The Trilateral Commission and the Bilderburgs. I think the defense rests on the "tinfoil hat" s***. Regardless of those situations, part 2 goes into the revolutions and mirrors what may be going on in Iran. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 QUOTE (lostfan @ Jan 21, 2010 -> 04:41 AM) The CIA really has f***ed around a lot in Iran though. A good 99% of me though thinks that of the things the CIA can f*** around with in Iran, manifesting civil protestations and popular upheaval isn't one of them. Coups? Sure...but this is far too democratic for the CIA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kapkomet Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 QUOTE (bmags @ Jan 20, 2010 -> 10:22 PM) A good 99% of me though thinks that of the things the CIA can f*** around with in Iran, manifesting civil protestations and popular upheaval isn't one of them. Coups? Sure...but this is far too democratic for the CIA. I agree with you on this one. /faints Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 It's important to remember that right now one of the best things the U.S. can do is to stay out of Iran. If we try and mettle the regime will claim the "Great Satan" is out to get Iran and the people will unify against a foreign enemy (at least, it will take the focus off of the unrest at home). We really need to let this play out and one of the best ways to foster this movement is to stay out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lostfan Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 QUOTE (bmags @ Jan 20, 2010 -> 11:22 PM) A good 99% of me though thinks that of the things the CIA can f*** around with in Iran, manifesting civil protestations and popular upheaval isn't one of them. Coups? Sure...but this is far too democratic for the CIA. I was going to make a similar post last night but I forgot where I was going with it. This is way too complex for the CIA, they really aren't competent/advanced enough to pull off something like this IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iWiN4PreP Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 This has some good information on it.. : http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/c...e-a-revolution/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 21, 2010 Share Posted January 21, 2010 QUOTE (CryptviLL @ Jan 21, 2010 -> 02:29 PM) This has some good information on it.. : http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/06/18/c...e-a-revolution/ Well duh. I don't think anyone is saying the US isn't doing ANYTHING to try and keep this moving, however, this at-best-revolution but at worst serious recrimination of the ayatollah's regime, was not created by the CIA and will not be finished by the CIA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 QUOTE (bmags @ Jan 21, 2010 -> 12:21 AM) We really need to let this play out and one of the best ways to foster this movement is to stay out. It worked out so well with Tiennamen Square. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 23, 2010 -> 11:08 PM) It worked out so well with Tiennamen Square. China doesn't routinely play the "great satan" card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 23, 2010 -> 06:08 PM) It worked out so well with Tiennamen Square. So, we should have helped overthrow the Chinese government in 89? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 23, 2010 -> 06:36 PM) So, we should have helped overthrow the Chinese government in 89? It never happened nor was it ever a thought, because the U.S. businessman and consumer needs Chinese slave labor too much. Democracy when it suits us financially. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 23, 2010 -> 06:43 PM) It never happened nor was it ever a thought, because the U.S. businessman and consumer needs Chinese slave labor too much. Democracy when it suits us financially. In 1989, the U.S. Businessman had very limited ties with the Chinese labor market. THat was a development mainly of the 1990s and 2000's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 24, 2010 Share Posted January 24, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 23, 2010 -> 06:47 PM) In 1989, the U.S. Businessman had very limited ties with the Chinese labor market. THat was a development mainly of the 1990s and 2000's. So, your graphs are saying that the quashing of the Democracy movement in China turned out to be for the best in the future business interests of the U.S.? The coincedence of the graph jumping after '89 is certainly noticeable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts