flavum Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Bout time. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=9533663 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (flavum @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 02:13 PM) Bout time. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=9533663 So I wonder how long it will take his balloon headed michael jackson impersonating co-hort from that magical home run chase to admit his guilt as well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 "It's time for me to talk about the past."Heh. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 What a douche bag. He better not ever make the HOF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 He doesn't admit as much stuff as Canseco accused him of doing, but I'll give him props for the admission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigEdWalsh Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Yeah, I'll give him his props for coming clean. Hopefully more admissions come from other cheaters. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 02:31 PM) What a douche bag. He better not ever make the HOF. Probably part of his admission. He knows it will never happen. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (flavum @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 03:35 PM) Probably part of his admission. He knows it will never happen. I'd say this admission just doubled his chances, or something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 02:38 PM) I'd say this admission just doubled his chances, or something like that. Sure. Doubling zero is still zero. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 If he has good enough numbers, he should be in the hall, cheater or not. Until recently, baseball did not care about cheating. You have admitted cheaters in the HOF, what does it really matter. If Bonds doesnt make the hall, the HOF in my mind becomes irrelevant. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Finally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 02:44 PM) If he has good enough numbers, he should be in the hall, cheater or not. Until recently, baseball did not care about cheating. You have admitted cheaters in the HOF, what does it really matter. If Bonds doesnt make the hall, the HOF in my mind becomes irrelevant. I take it you won't mind if your kids take steroids? I mean why shouldn't they? They could still make the HOF! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whitesoxfan99 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I hate Bobby Knight so much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 We all knew this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knightni Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I figured. Part of me didn't want to believe it, but most of me was waiting for an admittance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Bigsqwert, If my "child" was over the age of 18, was supervised by medical professionals who advised him that taking substance X, will make him wealthy beyond his wildest imagination and that there would be minimal to no negative side effects, I would tell them to make their own choice. The problem here is that this isnt about "health". This is about a witch hunt to "clean" baseball. And the only way to effectively do it, is to scapegoat all of the people who are currently out of baseball. I mean will A-Rod not be in the HOF, what about all the current players who have received no punishment or slaps on the wrist? What about all the names on the "list" are they all off the HOF. Its called being consistent, and its inconsistent to punish players who are not making MLB teams money, while letting those who currently are baseball cash cows continue to play with no ramification. Everyone in MLB was happy when Big Mac "saved baseball" and made them rich. Now that hes done his part, they can destroy him and not care. But yeah, lets just ban Bonds and McGwire because it makes us feel good at night. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSqwert Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Touche Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (knightni @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 02:56 PM) I figured. Part of me didn't want to believe it, but most of me was waiting for an admittance. Good. I still couldn't believe you defended him Jeremy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthSideSox72 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 That's a pretty good apology, about what I'd hope for. Still no ticket to the Hall though, not in my eyes. Sorry Mark. I'm glad you are coming clean and moving on with your life, but your reward should not include enshrinement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 If he doesn't get in(Bonds), you are setting a precedent that A-Rod also cannot gain access to the HOF. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (nitetrain8601 @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 04:16 PM) If he doesn't get in(Bonds), you are setting a precedent that A-Rod also cannot gain access to the HOF. I wonder if it's possible to create a "Steroid era" section of the facility in Cooperstown. I don't know if you can simply deny that those years ever happened. Maybe you could get McNamee to hand over Clemens's needles and put them next to McGwire's bat or something like that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I also would think its only fair to remove all pitchers who admittedly used illegal pitches, any player who corked their bat or was caught cheating, etc. If you want to remove cheaters, remove cheaters. If you want to create scapegoats, well the HOF is doing a great job. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flavum Posted January 11, 2010 Author Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 02:44 PM) If he has good enough numbers, he should be in the hall, cheater or not. Until recently, baseball did not care about cheating. You have admitted cheaters in the HOF, what does it really matter. If Bonds doesnt make the hall, the HOF in my mind becomes irrelevant. The Hall of Fame is almost irrelevant because guys like Sosa, McGwire, Bonds, Palmeiro, (shall I go on?) made it irrelevant. You can make an argument that Clemens and Bonds had good enough careers before their PED use, but McGwire was able to get to 583 homers ONLY by juicing. He didn't even get to 2000 hits in his career. Next to not allowing non-whites into MLB, this is the saddest chapter in baseball history. If you don't see it, I can't help you. Edited January 11, 2010 by flavum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jan 11, 2010 -> 03:19 PM) I also would think its only fair to remove all pitchers who admittedly used illegal pitches, any player who corked their bat or was caught cheating, etc. If you want to remove cheaters, remove cheaters. If you want to create scapegoats, well the HOF is doing a great job. WINNER Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 (edited) How did cheaters of today make the HOF irrelevant when it has been accepting cheaters for years? Who cheated first: Gaylord Perry Big Mac Barry Bonds Which of them is in the HOF? The saddest chapter in baseball is the current chapter where people have evolved this "holier than thou" attitude, and forget that the Hall is filed with cheaters from all eras, and that baseball needed a few scapegoats to cover up the fact that everyone was cheating. Either ban all cheaters, or ban no cheaters. Edited January 11, 2010 by Soxbadger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.