GoSox05 Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 04:19 PM) No but this was interesting: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47438 And yes, it's Coulter, but it does put this whole incident into a very interesting context. Why did I even read that article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 04:19 PM) No but this was interesting: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47438 And yes, it's Coulter, but it does put this whole incident into a very interesting context. Jesus christ, you think that artucle helps your point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 04:45 PM) Jesus christ, you think that artucle helps your point? lol. No, I just think she brings up some interesting points. Looks pretty shady all around. Axelrod working his chicago politics magic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted November 10, 2011 Share Posted November 10, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 05:08 PM) lol. No, I just think she brings up some interesting points. Looks pretty shady all around. Axelrod working his chicago politics magic. "Brings up interesting points" and Coulter [she] should never be used in the same sentence. That article is awful conspiracy theory crap with massive logic failures every other sentence. What the dumb talking heads and the Cain campaign keep saying, "anonymous accusations!" and what really happened, two settled cases with NDA's forcing these people to remain anonymous plus 3 additional claims of impropriety, are two completely different things. LOL she accuses the Trib of being part of the Democrat Machine. Please tell me you don't regularly read anything by her. The whole thing is basically one big non sequitor. Edited November 10, 2011 by StrangeSox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (Tex @ Feb 1, 2010 -> 04:47 PM) Perry - Palin '12 haha, what a terrible prediction from texsox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 11, 2011 Author Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (mr_genius @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 08:21 PM) haha, what a terrible prediction from texsox Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 11, 2011 Author Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 03:56 PM) If someone was shouting "look! this woman accusing Cain of SH filed for bankruptcy in 1998....GOLD DIGGER!" then i'd agree with you. But as i've explained numerous times, look at the whole picture. IMO she's full of s*** and looking to cash in on the opportunity here. Are you also suggesting that Cain didn't do anything wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 hasn't Cain's main accuser been involved in like 20 lawsuits over the past 5 years? kind of weird don't you think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 11, 2011 Author Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (mr_genius @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 08:30 PM) hasn't Cain's main accuser been involved in like 20 lawsuits over the past 5 years? kind of weird don't you think? I thought there were several more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 11, 2011 Author Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (mr_genius @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 08:21 PM) haha, what a terrible prediction from texsox BTW, I think we can all agree that Perry needs a teleprompter, just like the savior Obama who doesn't speak without one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Tex @ Nov 10, 2011 -> 08:36 PM) BTW, I think we can all agree that Perry needs a teleprompter, just like the savior Obama who doesn't speak without one. Perry trying to read and stand at the same time? recipe for disaster. he probably should have stayed away from the rest of the debates like he said he would. Edited November 11, 2011 by mr_genius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texsox Posted November 11, 2011 Author Share Posted November 11, 2011 Well shucks, if y'all want some slickster politician who can smooth talk ya, well then Perry isn't for you. You know we already got that. I guess we can just keep that feller and his fancy words that speechwriters come up. But if you want a God honest man for president, one that will occasionally, like all of us, slip up, Perry is still your best option. You know, he kind of reminds me of Reagan . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 I will say that Perry is playing this off extremely well. But Presidential candidates don't get to have senior moments when you are talking about the bread and butter of your policy goals. New CBS poll comes out today and has Cain plummeting to earth, down nine points from a couple weeks ago. Still in front though. The leaders: Cain 18% Undecided 17% Romney 15% Newt 15% SOMEONE ELSE 14% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 Sadly all Romney has to do is keep his mouth shut and he will be the nominee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 11, 2011 -> 12:52 PM) Sadly all Romney has to do is keep his mouth shut and he will be the nominee. That CBS poll, although it's wierd, suggests a plummet for Mittens as well. It has "Not Romney" at 85%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 Is it possible that the Republicans will fail to nominate a candidate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Nov 11, 2011 -> 02:28 PM) Is it possible that the Republicans will fail to nominate a candidate? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StrangeSox Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 I wasn't being serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 11, 2011 -> 01:48 PM) That CBS poll, although it's wierd, suggests a plummet for Mittens as well. It has "Not Romney" at 85%. This is true. Although the trend lines have been choppy for Mittens between 15 and 21 in this poll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 11, 2011 -> 12:48 PM) That CBS poll, although it's wierd, suggests a plummet for Mittens as well. It has "Not Romney" at 85%. There is no way on god's green earth you can use the polls to project anything in this race. None. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rex Kickass Posted November 11, 2011 Share Posted November 11, 2011 McClatchy/Marist out today. Mittens 23% Newt 19% Herman Cain 17% UNDECIDED 17% Ronpaul 10% Lead Singer of Journey 8% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_genius Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 i told you guys Newt Gingrich was going to make a legit run at the nomination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 QUOTE (mr_genius @ Nov 11, 2011 -> 07:07 PM) i told you guys Newt Gingrich was going to make a legit run at the nomination. I would love to see him and Obama in a debate. Romney might match him, but I think Newt would make Obama look like an amateur. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Nov 12, 2011 -> 06:14 PM) I would love to see him and Obama in a debate. Romney might match him, but I think Newt would make Obama look like an amateur. Newt's problem in a debate against anyone, where he's 1 on 1, is coming off as way too condescending. You can hear it in plenty of the clips from these debates, and in a 90 minute debate, each of them only gets like 10 minutes to talk. In 45-50 minutes, telling the viewers that "The elites won't tell you this" only works so many times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jenksismyhero Posted November 12, 2011 Share Posted November 12, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Nov 12, 2011 -> 05:19 PM) Newt's problem in a debate against anyone, where he's 1 on 1, is coming off as way too condescending. You can hear it in plenty of the clips from these debates, and in a 90 minute debate, each of them only gets like 10 minutes to talk. In 45-50 minutes, telling the viewers that "The elites won't tell you this" only works so many times. His directness is the opposite of Obama's blathering. I think it'll come off as being on point, having an actual answer. Not just being a snobby elite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts