Jump to content

Tigers Sign Damon - 1 yr, 8 mil; NTC


chetkincaid

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:18 PM)
Well it already did on paper, this development moves it from mediocre to bad in my opinion. I think Johnny Damon could have moved us from a low to mid 80's wins team to a mid to upper 80's wins team, which might be the difference in our division. It's really a shame.

 

He's not worth $3M more than Abreu played for last season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:28 PM)
I want to know how we swung and missed on so many DH candidates this offseason.

 

Now all I can hope is Kenny makes a trade for Crawford, since Gonzalez is nothing more than a really nice pipe dream.

 

I hear you on this one. I am interested to see if they call Jermaine Dye. He's getting no offers and would be a better DH than the guys we currently have, but that bridge may have already been burned. As it is, the one positive we have on our side is we can pitch and this division sucks. With that in mind, the front office will probably be willing to add a bat in July, since I think it's very likely by that point we'll be in the race, yet also realize our offense is awful.

 

QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:32 PM)
He's not worth $3M more than Abreu played for last season.

 

I completely agree, he's being overpaid. But overpaying is sometimes necessary to fill holes, and I think this would have been a good spot to do it.

Edited by whitesoxfan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (WHarris1 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 11:31 PM)
It's not that I think we should drop 8M on Damon, I just get ill thinking of all the Kotsay ABs we're going to have to witness this year

 

Just think, one line drive out against Nathan started this whole Kotsay phenomenon. Blame it on Brian Anderson, I guess!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (WHarris1 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:31 PM)
It's not that I think we should drop 8M on Damon, I just get ill thinking of all the Kotsay ABs we're going to have to witness this year

 

C'mon guys. If this Damon drama proved anything it's that Kenny is not gonna let the Kotsay/Jones DH experiment happen for very long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 03:19 PM)
Not worse than last year? We've replaced the power numbers from Dye and Thome with Jones and Teahan.

 

Actually, we've replaced Dye with Pierre and Fields/Nix/Getz with Teahen. The drop-off from Thome to Jones is significant, but that's the major drop-off. If Rios is halfway decent and Quentin is healthy, this offense will be at least a little better.

 

QUOTE (South Side Fireworks Man @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 03:13 PM)
@ $8M for one year, Tigers overpaid. Let them have him at that price.

 

Agreed. That said, Thome and Branyan have already signed for cheap. If Kenny overlooks Blalock as well, he'dd better have something big in store down the road.

Edited by WCSox
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:33 PM)
Just think, one line drive out against Nathan started this whole Kotsay phenomenon. Blame it on Brian Anderson, I guess!

 

I don't think Kotsay playing well in the eyes of the FO down the stretch last year is why they are going to the rotating DH thing this year. I just think Ozzie actually likes the idea of being able to rotate a bunch of crappy hitters in that spot because of the "versatility" it allows him, and Kenny has made the unfortuate decision to allow this mistake to happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (JoeCoolMan24 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:28 PM)
Alright, plan C: Jermaine Dye.

 

Seriously, I would hope he would sign a $4M deal with us to DH considering he is getting NO OFFERS from anyone else right now.

 

You know what? I'd go to JD and say "Look. I'll give you $3M to DH, since you can't play the field. Take it or leave it." Then, let him and Jones it out, and if they both suck, cut Jones, if they both hit, trade one midseason for prospects. If Jones hits and JD doesn't, DFA JD and trade for Crawford, and if JD hits and Jones doesn't...don't do anything. We know how competition for roster

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:34 PM)
You know what? I'd go to JD and say "Look. I'll give you $3M to DH, since you can't play the field. Take it or leave it." Then, let him and Jones it out, and if they both suck, cut Jones, if they both hit, trade one midseason for prospects. If Jones hits and JD doesn't, DFA JD and trade for Crawford, and if JD hits and Jones doesn't...don't do anything. We know how competition for roster

If he would accept the fact he's a DH, he'd probably be a good one. If he still fights it and thinks he should play in the field, he'll struggle. DHing isn't for everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (WCSox @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:34 PM)
Actually, we've replaced Dye with Pierre and Fields/Nix/Getz with Teahen. The drop-off from Thome to Jones is significant, but that's the major drop-off. If Rios is halfway decent and Quentin is healthy, this offense will be at least a little better.

 

 

 

Agreed. That said, Thome and Branyan have already signed for cheap. If Kenny overlooks Blalock as well, he'dd better have something big in store down the road.

 

Blalock would be a terrible fit. Save the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 03:34 PM)
You know what? I'd go to JD and say "Look. I'll give you $3M to DH, since you can't play the field. Take it or leave it." Then, let him and Jones it out, and if they both suck, cut Jones, if they both hit, trade one midseason for prospects. If Jones hits and JD doesn't, DFA JD and trade for Crawford, and if JD hits and Jones doesn't...don't do anything. We know how competition for roster

 

That's not a bad option, but that bridge may likely be burned.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:37 PM)
Blalock would be a terrible fit. Save the money.

 

I suppose you could sign him and platoon him and Andruw Jones. I don't think Jones numbers vary greatly between his facing lefty and right pitchers though, and that would give Blalock the vast majority of the at bats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not for 8 million. No. Besides, if the Sox had put that much money into Damon, there would not be a spot for Konerko to DH when the Sox trade for Adrian Gonzalez. Felipe López is available too I think and he fired Boras. It's a DH guys. Hell Jermaine Dye would make a fine DH if that bridge hasn't been burned. If the Sox start the year with Nix a DH, it won't be the end of the world. We know the Sox have another 6 million to throw at the right bat, and they have prospects to trade. Screw Damon. He's a tiger. LET SPRING TRAINING BEGIN!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

The fact that the Tigers are feeling they're back into this AL Central race speaks volumes.

 

After basically surrendering the season with the trading of Granderson and Jackson for budgetary reasons, they've reversed course and added Valverde and now Damon.

 

I guess this is the final nail in the coffin for any hopes the White Sox had for sustaining a new approach...it lasted from 2006-2010, but we no longer have the clear advantage over the Twins and certainly not over the Tigers in payroll or the willingness to spend that money.

 

If KW has still had a difficult time keeping up with the Twins and Bill Smith (not nearly as effective as his predecessor Ryan....thank God they don't have Bartlett and Garza now) when MIN was operating at 65% of capacity, then why should we expect anything different in the future?

 

I understand that sometimes moves like the Carlos Lee one will work out mysteriously in the end (while somewhat baffling at the time), but this approach isn't any better. We've constructed a Minnesota Twins-like team to play at USCF. Whoopee. Well, this is all on KW...I don't buy the whole blaming Ozzie thing for our present line-up construction. So, because this strategy worked in 2005, it will work again. We shall see.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:34 PM)
You know what? I'd go to JD and say "Look. I'll give you $3M to DH, since you can't play the field. Take it or leave it." Then, let him and Jones it out, and if they both suck, cut Jones, if they both hit, trade one midseason for prospects. If Jones hits and JD doesn't, DFA JD and trade for Crawford, and if JD hits and Jones doesn't...don't do anything. We know how competition for roster

 

Can you guys please look past Dye? He's done. There's a reason he's not signed. The rest of baseball knows that guy that tortured us with a .175 BA for the 3 months we needed him most is only gonna get worse.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:40 PM)
I understand that sometimes moves like the Carlos Lee one will work out mysteriously in the end (while somewhat baffling at the time), but this approach isn't any better. We've constructed a Minnesota Twins-like team to play at USCF. Whoopee. Well, this is all on KW...I don't buy the whole blaming Ozzie thing for our present line-up construction. So, because this strategy worked in 2005, it will work again. We shall see.

 

What do you buy then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (103 mph screwball @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:40 PM)
Not for 8 million. No. Besides, if the Sox had put that much money into Damon, there would not be a spot for Konerko to DH when the Sox trade for Adrian Gonzalez. Felipe López is available too I think and he fired Boras. It's a DH guys. Hell Jermaine Dye would make a fine DH if that bridge hasn't been burned. If the Sox start the year with Nix a DH, it won't be the end of the world. We know the Sox have another 6 million to throw at the right bat, and they have prospects to trade. Screw Damon. He's a tiger. LET SPRING TRAINING BEGIN!!!!

 

 

Do you really believe they're going to trade away Flowers, Hudson and Mitchell/Danks for A-Gonzalez? Forget about it.

 

If the 2007 and 2009 seasons have shown anything, it's our inability to develop and not have to trade our minor league prospects that has put us in this defensive position with roster construction in the first place.

 

Felipe Lopez most definitely won't be our DH, either.

 

If the Sox start the year with Nix as ANYTHING but DH against LHP, then it will have been officially worse than starting 2009 with Anderson/Wise/Getz/Fields/Lillibridge/Miller.

 

The irony is that after everyone has put the Thome debate behind them, KW will probably be forced to add someone like Adam Dunn and we'll be right back where we started, excepted likely 3-7 games back in the standings and having lost more prospects because we hadn't developed enough hitters in our minor league system over the last decade.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (iamshack @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:46 PM)
What do you buy then?

 

 

That KW put himself in a financial straight-jacket with the Peavy and Rios acquisitions...

 

There were a lot of "ifs" at the eve of 2005, too. Iguchi, Pods, Dye coming off an injury, and exactly what did El Duque have left, if anything? How close was McCarthy (not unlike Hudson this year)? Takatsu was the de-facto closer but everyone was worried about hitters sitting on his FB and laying off the frisbees (see One Tricky Pony). The bullpen, there were no hints of the seasons Cotts and Politte would have.

 

The problem I guess is when there's no margin for error, everything has to go right. We have insurance for one injury in the starting rotation, that's good.

 

I'm starting to believe that Tyler Flowers is going to be given a serious look as the DH at some point this season, maybe even in the first half. Otherwise, there's not really any logic to what KW is doing.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...