Jump to content

Tigers Sign Damon - 1 yr, 8 mil; NTC


chetkincaid

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 2.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (iamshack @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 02:42 PM)
Blalock is a Boras client. It would be interesting to see if the two parties could work together after the failed Damon Negotiations. Kenny did mention that he and Boras had some good discussions which might lead to inroads in the future.

 

I see the Crawford idea, but I think it would be pretty difficult to trade Crawford midseason considering Friedman thinks this team is their best in team history.

 

All true. I also imagine that Boras is also not happy with Kenny costing both him and Damon money with yesterday's announcement.

 

But business is business, and two guys who don't like each other will still work together when it comes down to it. It'll be interesting to see how all of this shakes out.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So the Sox show some interest in two legitimate DH candidates, only to allow both to go to division rivals. When we finish 6 games out of first this season due mainly to being 11th in the AL in runs (or something close to that), I hope the front office brass understands why everybody is pissed.

Edited by whitesoxfan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (knightni @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:13 PM)
KW and Ozzie just going to prove to us that mediocre hitting can win a championship. :huh

 

Well, we've done it once before, 9th in the AL in runs in 2005 with 741. I can't see this offense hitting either of those plateaus, though, and obviously this bullpen won't match that one. This is probably an 83 or so win team, the question is can they overachieve by 5 or 6 wins (certainly possible with this starting staff) and if they do, will that win total be enough to win a mediocre division?

Edited by whitesoxfan101
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 07:16 PM)
Well, we've done it once before, 9th in the AL in runs in 2005 with 741. I can't see this offense hitting either of those plateaus, though.

You really can't see this offense scoring 741 runs? I can. Not that I didn't want Damon, I really really did, but I don't think his absence puts us that far back. Certainly not worse than last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:17 PM)
Our offense looks very mediocre on paper now.

 

Well it already did on paper, this development moves it from mediocre to bad in my opinion. I think Johnny Damon could have moved us from a low to mid 80's wins team to a mid to upper 80's wins team, which might be the difference in our division. It's really a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ScottyDo @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:18 PM)
You really can't see this offense scoring 741 runs? I can. Not that I didn't want Damon, I really really did, but I don't think his absence puts us that far back. Certainly not worse than last year.

Not worse than last year? We've replaced the power numbers from Dye and Thome with Jones and Teahan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (ScottyDo @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:18 PM)
You really can't see this offense scoring 741 runs? I can. Not that I didn't want Damon, I really really did, but I don't think his absence puts us that far back. Certainly not worse than last year.

 

Absolutely not. This is going to be a horrible offense unless Carlos Quentin returns to 2008 form (which is possible if healthy, but I don't trust his health) and/or Alex Rios returns to mid 2000's form. We could use another season like last year from Juan Pierre too, but that's a question mark. If all of those things happen, the offense could max out at average (6th to 8th range in runs in the AL), but that's going to be very tough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (whitesoxfan101 @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 05:16 PM)
Well, we've done it once before, 9th in the AL in runs in 2005 with 741. I can't see this offense hitting either of those plateaus, though, and obviously this bullpen won't match that one. This is probably an 83 or so win team, the question is can they overachieve by 5 or 6 wins (certainly possible with this starting staff) and if they do, will that win total be enough to win a mediocre division?

 

I just wanted a left hand bat that didn't strike out a thousand times a year. And no, I did NOT want Jim Thome anymore. I didn't even want Damon in the beginning. This sucks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Feb 20, 2010 -> 06:21 PM)
We will be the Mariners of last year.

 

I don't think we'll be THAT extreme (I think they were literally dead last in runs and 1st in ERA). However, the comparision is very valid, they were a low or mid 80's team that pitched great and could not hit a lick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...