Jump to content

Competitors for the open bullpen slot


scenario

Who do you think wins the 7th bullpen slot, if there is one?  

78 members have voted

  1. 1. Which reliever makes the pen...

    • Daniel Cabrera
      6
    • Sergio Santos
      31
    • Dan Hudson
      16
    • Jhonny Nunez
      6
    • Freddy Dolsi
      4
    • Brandon Hynick
      0
    • Carlos Torres
      8
    • Clevelan Santeliz
      2
    • Someone not currently with the team
      1
    • No one - no 7th man will be taken
      4


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 180
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (Heads22 @ Mar 13, 2010 -> 10:58 PM)
Greg Aquino and Sergio Santos appear to be the early leaders.

 

I'm rooting for Santos, for 3 reasons.

 

1) I think he'll do well

2) With ESPN talking about him, it will be harder to pass him through waivers.

3) His name is awesome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santos may be able to give the sox an inning at a time. But the sox need a guy who can throw 2-3 innings a pop, keep them in the game, filling the role similar to what Carrasco did last year [though not for 4-5 innings when Colon and Jose blew up]. The Sox likely won't need a true long man, but a guy who can go multiple innings. Santos isn't reliable yet and needs work still to get to that point. IMO, nothing short of perfection in 15+ innings should keep him from going through the waiver process. The sox aren't in the business of letting their bullpen guys get on the job training at the major league level, which is what Santos would require. One spring isn't going to cut it.

 

If the sox are intent on keeping Hudson in AAA as a SP, then Torres likely is the last man. He's shown he can get outs at the major league level. Right now, I'd say Torres and even Greg Aquino are ahead of Santos. Aquino has looked sharp from what I've seen, throwing strikes with some good stuff. The sox look like they're trying to stretch him out.

Edited by beck72
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Torres has to be the odd on favorite here if Hudson is destined for AAA. You need someone who can give you multiple innings, and to be the lamb during blowouts. Garbage time is the right time for Mr. Torres. He fills Nick Massett's old role.

 

I did vote for someone outside the organization. I still think they may try to get another guy, especially with Jenks hurting and behind.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 09:34 AM)
Torres has to be the odd on favorite here if Hudson is destined for AAA. You need someone who can give you multiple innings, and to be the lamb during blowouts. Garbage time is the right time for Mr. Torres. He fills Nick Massett's old role.

 

I did vote for someone outside the organization. I still think they may try to get another guy, especially with Jenks hurting and behind.

We'll win more games if Santos can stay up as a reliable reliever who can be used fairly regularly than we will if Torres stays up to cover those 1-2 games where we desperately need a long reliever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (beck72 @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 06:57 AM)
Santos may be able to give the sox an inning at a time. But the sox need a guy who can throw 2-3 innings a pop, keep them in the game, filling the role similar to what Carrasco did last year [though not for 4-5 innings when Colon and Jose blew up]. The Sox likely won't need a true long man, but a guy who can go multiple innings. Santos isn't reliable yet and needs work still to get to that point. IMO, nothing short of perfection in 15+ innings should keep him from going through the waiver process. The sox aren't in the business of letting their bullpen guys get on the job training at the major league level, which is what Santos would require. One spring isn't going to cut it.

 

If the sox are intent on keeping Hudson in AAA as a SP, then Torres likely is the last man. He's shown he can get outs at the major league level. Right now, I'd say Torres and even Greg Aquino are ahead of Santos. Aquino has looked sharp from what I've seen, throwing strikes with some good stuff. The sox look like they're trying to stretch him out.

Carrasco gave the Sox 3+ innings 9 times last year, 8 of those turned out to be losses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 12:56 PM)
Carrasco gave the Sox 3+ innings 9 times last year, 8 of those turned out to be losses.

You know darn well that if Carrasco is pitching 3+ innings, that means you are in some sort of blow-out. Really, his job is to eat innings and protect the rest of the bullpen. And if he happens to keep you in the games occasionally too, that's a bonus. That role does have value.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 01:26 PM)
You know darn well that if Carrasco is pitching 3+ innings, that means you are in some sort of blow-out. Really, his job is to eat innings and protect the rest of the bullpen. And if he happens to keep you in the games occasionally too, that's a bonus. That role does have value.

That was kind of the point. If you need 3+ innings he's not going to be able to keep you in the game since you're probably already down big and he's likely to give up a run or 2 himself and if you need 2 innings for whatever reason Pena can give you that with a much greater success rate than Carlos Torres. You're going to have maybe 1 blowout a month where your bullpen has to give you 5+ innings, I'm not going to carry and awful pitcher in Torres and risk losing Santos just for that rare occurrence so he can maybe save Pena, Santos, Williams or Linebrink from having to give you a few innings in the same game. It's a 12 man pen; they can absorb the very rare blowout.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 01:45 PM)
That was kind of the point. If you need 3+ innings he's not going to be able to keep you in the game since you're probably already down big and he's likely to give up a run or 2 himself and if you need 2 innings for whatever reason Pena can give you that with a much greater success rate than Carlos Torres. You're going to have maybe 1 blowout a month where your bullpen has to give you 5+ innings, I'm not going to carry and awful pitcher in Torres and risk losing Santos just for that rare occurrence so he can maybe save Pena, Santos, Williams or Linebrink from having to give you a few innings in the same game. It's a 12 man pen; they can absorb the very rare blowout.

 

And God willing, those blowouts won't happen as often this year. We've got 5 guys that we should be able to lean on in the rotation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 05:56 PM)
Carrasco gave the Sox 3+ innings 9 times last year, 8 of those turned out to be losses.

Ideally, the long man would keep the other team from scoring and the offense would rally. The sox offense has not been an offense that could rally from a deficit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (beck72 @ Mar 14, 2010 -> 10:25 PM)
Ideally, the long man would keep the other team from scoring and the offense would rally. The sox offense has not been an offense that could rally from a deficit.

 

So, given that the Sox have a pitching heavy team with an offense that most feel won't be able to rally from a large deficit, wouldn't you rather have the guy that helps you win the (likely more numerable) close games than the handful of blowouts that the Sox have a small shot at coming back to win?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Disco72 @ Mar 15, 2010 -> 06:40 PM)
So, given that the Sox have a pitching heavy team with an offense that most feel won't be able to rally from a large deficit, wouldn't you rather have the guy that helps you win the (likely more numerable) close games than the handful of blowouts that the Sox have a small shot at coming back to win?

I don't think it's an "either", "or" situation. The Sox need a bullpen arm who can go multiple innings, given the make up of the current group of vets. That helps the rest of the bullpen by not having them used up. Yet the Sox should also go with the best pitcher. That is why you are seeing guys get stretched out like Aquino, Torres, and Santos.

 

Also, I think the Sox are trying to get a lineup that will more likely come back from deficits-similar to what the Twins offense has done in the past. The Twins have had bullpens that have held teams close while the offense can cut into leads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (scenario @ Mar 17, 2010 -> 12:34 AM)
Looks like it's becoming a 2-man race between Santos and Aquino.

 

Hudson could be the 3rd man in the race, but the Sox will likely keep him stretched out as a starter in Charlotte.

Ozzie basically said he's headed to Charlotte with quotes like "he needs to go out and pitch" and "we need him ready just in case something happens to a starter." (I'm paraphrasing, of course)

 

Given that Greg Aquino is 32, has already bombed in the majors something like 4 times and is signed to a minor league deal (he can be sent to Charlotte without having to pass through waivers) and Santos is out of options, pitching great and a prized possession of the coaching staff I do believe the competition is all but won.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Mar 17, 2010 -> 12:44 AM)
Ozzie basically said he's headed to Charlotte with quotes like "he needs to go out and pitch" and "we need him ready just in case something happens to a starter." (I'm paraphrasing, of course)

 

Given that Greg Aquino is 32, has already bombed in the majors something like 4 times and is signed to a minor league deal (he can be sent to Charlotte without having to pass through waivers) and Santos is out of options, pitching great and a prized possession of the coaching staff I do believe the competition is all but won.

 

Exactly. In a two horse race, the only way Aquino wins, is if Santos falls apart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pretty much every teams last spot in the pen is nothing more than a rotating door full of terrible production throughout the year. Going into this off-season i was not particularly confident in the bullpen being entirely shored up from the front end to the back end. Now, frighteningly, i actually think i have less confidence than then. Santos is the definition of raw talent, something which he will not be able harness in such a limited period of time. I personally don't give santos a month on the big league roster, and if he is still somehow still around at the all star break, we will all be able to claim that we witnessed a miracle in action. When aquino is your second best option (last spot) you have a problem (big). Basically what it comes down to is a battle to see which piece of s*** smells less. It's terrible. No good reason for it to come down to this.

 

It seems like i have seen very little concern about putz this off-season. Why is this? In my opinion putz is far from a lock to put up good numbers, let alone the possibility of stellar numbers. I will be content if he ends up being just slightly above average at this point. Linkbrink. Enough said. Pena i can potentially see big things out of, but realistically speaking i envision he will be somewhere between slightly above to slightly below average. Hopefully williams gives us a year flash in the pan type year, it would be a big boost to what appears to be a fragile pen. Never under ozzie's reign have both lefties in the pen both had good years. Six full seasons. The last good season the sox got out of a ''loogy'' was 2003, manuel's last season here. Marte's 2005 was terrible despite what looks like a not so terrible era, which was 3.77. For a guy that loves his matchups, it seems kinda odd to me that the loogies have been as bad as they have under him. Really bad. Then again he can only use what is available, which therefore lies on kenny williams shoulders.

 

All in all, the only actual bona fide confidence i have in the pen would be thornton and jenks. Yes, jenks.

 

=============================================================================

 

I was reading over this thread again and i came across this. I don't know why it bothered me... but it did.

 

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 23, 2010 -> 11:12 PM)
At the Dodgers 13 inning game, he was overpowering the Dodgers players.

 

If they trade for Gonzalez, I'd try and include some throw ins to get Poreda back. I think he could be a good lefty out the pen.

 

 

QUOTE (Kalapse @ Feb 23, 2010 -> 11:20 PM)
Looking at PitchFX data; Poreda threw 13 fastballs in that game (no runners reached base on him so I assume they were all from the windup), the average velocity on his fastball was 92.35 MPH with a max speed of 93.6.

 

For reference: Jenks and Thornton were both clocked at about 95/96 (avg/max) in that same game.

 

 

QUOTE (Quinarvy @ Feb 23, 2010 -> 11:26 PM)
Eh, I was going by eye, because most people were gone at that point so I went and sat around the plate.

 

Maybe the Dodgers were just tired by that point.

 

Now don't let kalapse make you think otherwise... not that i think he was trying to. Overpowering someone does not just entail high velocity. It goes into much greater detail. Throughout this games history some of the very nastiest and most overpowering pitchers are those who are lucky if they can hit 90 on the radar.

Edited by qwerty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Santos has been pitching for less than a year, chances are when the games matter he's not going to be very effective. Maybe that's the Sox plan. Perhaps he couldn't make it through waivers right now. Maybe they throw him into a couple of blowouts and either he pitches well and he builds on it, or he gets lit up or otherwise struggles and gets through waivers more easily.

 

I would bet anyone on this board anything that if Santos and Linebrink each throw 40 innings in the major leagues this season, Linebrink will have the better ERA.

 

This bullpen slot actually may be pretty important if Jenks isn't ready to go. There has to be some concern. The fact that he's now testing out a wind up has to make you wonder if something other than an arm not being built up enough yet is wrong. Maybe it takes a little pressure off his calf.

Edited by Dick Allen
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As someone mentioned earlier in this thread, Aquino has been a bum every major league season since his first one. I don't expect that to change and his mediocre stuff to get better. Because of the reward associated with Santos, I am keeping him, especially with a group of very solid starters who should go six innings each time. Add to that guys like Thornton, Putz, Liney, Pena and Williams are looking solid, I think you can afford to take the risk associated with Santos as the last guy. Also, it's not like Aquino is a Hudson- and Torres-type who can pitch 3-4 innings, Aquino is a 1-2 inning guy like Santos, so being an innings eater doesn't have an affect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...