Jump to content

Elijah Dukes cut by Nats


Steve9347

Recommended Posts

The Nats said that his cutting was baseball related. I posted this in the catch-all thread and I'll repeat it here.

There's no "baseball related" reason on their roster to release him. The only replacements on their roster as OF's are Justin Maxwell (Kinda young, career .793 minor league OPS), Chris Duncan, Willie Harris (group 4!), Willie Taveras, or moving another player there.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

General manager Mike Rizzo called the release "a performance-based decision" but also implied Dukes's place in the clubhouse adversely affected the Nationals. Rizzo said the Nationals "will be a more cohesive, united group" without Dukes.

 

"The clubhouse will be more united," Rizzo said. "We'll have a better feel around the ballclub. We'll gain just by that alone."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Mar 17, 2010 -> 10:44 AM)
General manager Mike Rizzo called the release "a performance-based decision" but also implied Dukes's place in the clubhouse adversely affected the Nationals. Rizzo said the Nationals "will be a more cohesive, united group" without Dukes.

 

"The clubhouse will be more united," Rizzo said. "We'll have a better feel around the ballclub. We'll gain just by that alone."

 

And they'll still lose 100 games. But they'll be more united! I know we would never look at Dukes. Kenny has developed an obsession with "character" guys. But I'd take Dukes in a second over Juan Pierre.

Edited by Jordan4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ Mar 17, 2010 -> 01:25 PM)
And the Nationals have interest in Jermaine Dye. I'm sure that's not his first choice, but if he wants to play...

 

He has been waiting for a chance, this is it. I wonder how far down he is willing to accept in pay right now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dukes stared down my friend Matt who heckled him back when he played for Montgomery. Matt said he had never been more scared in his life and left that game early. Looks like he was proven right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Mar 19, 2010 -> 09:04 AM)
For a while, the Nats has Lastings Milledge in that outfield as well, what a coaches dream.

Wasn't he penned as the Nats' starting OFer last spring but didn't make it through May? And the All-Star ballot was already written by then so he was on the ballot while having only played like 4 games? I remember the Nats fans trying to 'stick it to the system' by voting for him to start in the All-Star game despite him being in AA... too bad all 17 of their fans weren't enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (The Baconator @ Mar 20, 2010 -> 02:21 AM)
Wasn't he penned as the Nats' starting OFer last spring but didn't make it through May? And the All-Star ballot was already written by then so he was on the ballot while having only played like 4 games? I remember the Nats fans trying to 'stick it to the system' by voting for him to start in the All-Star game despite him being in AA... too bad all 17 of their fans weren't enough.

 

No, that was an internet craze to try and prove how stupid fan voting is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...