SoxAce Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 11:24 AM) I'd take that out of Danks2 for sure. Me too no doubt. Good hitter he was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnCangelosi Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 25, 2010 -> 08:36 PM) I have yet to hear a single person knock D2's play in CF. The thing against him is always the big hole in his swing. His defense gets mad raves. Sounds a lot like a guy known as BA :-P Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scenario Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (JohnCangelosi @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 12:32 PM) Sounds a lot like a guy known as BA :-P Nah. Brian had a loopy swing. Danks' swing is much tighter. If Jordan can learn to keep from pulling his head off the ball, he'll be fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (scenario @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 10:50 AM) I'm not a scout, but I've watched a fair bit of video with Danks at the plate... and his "problem" seems pretty obvious to me. He pulls his head off the ball. It's sort of frustrating to watch actually, because it happens so consistently. Seems logical that has alot to do with his contact problems... because his walk rates suggest he doesn't have a problem with his batting eye. In fact, his judgment on what is a ball or strike seems excellent. But once he starts his swing mechanics, you can see there is a point about midway where his head pulls away... almost inevitably leading to a swing and a miss. I'd have to believe the coaches have identified this and are helping him with it. If he gets that fixed and increases his contact rate as a result, I think he has a really good shot at MLB. If he doesn't, not much chance he'll be more than a fringe player. If that's the case, there's Carlos Quentin to help. Q's head never moves when he's in his crouch. Getting in a stance where your arms restrict head movement would be a good idea if Danks has a problem with keeping his head on the ball (I used to have this problem and I still do. It's hard to get rid of). Edited March 26, 2010 by chw42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxAce Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 12:45 PM) Getting in a stance where your arms restrict head movement would be a good idea if Danks has a problem with keeping his head on the ball (I used to have this problem and I still do. It's hard to get rid of). So did I. It was sad when opposing pitchers had to point it out to me after the game.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 (edited) I don't know why, but when I go up to hit, I usually end up pulling my head off the ball. But if I'm swinging in any other situation, I can keep my head still. I think it's a mental thing. This started about 5 years ago. Before that, I had really good hitting mechanics. Edited March 26, 2010 by chw42 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wsgdf_2 Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 11:49 AM) I don't know why, but when I go up to hit, I usually end up pulling my head off the ball. But if I'm swinging in any other situation, I can keep my head still. I think it's a mental thing. This started about 5 years ago. Before that, I had really good hitting mechanics. Work on driving the ball up the middle and opposite way. Easiest way to make sure you keep your head still. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wsgdf_2 Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (wsgdf_2 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 12:58 PM) Work on driving the ball up the middle and opposite way. Easiest way to make sure you keep your head still. Oh. One other thing. Watch the ball. Sounds silly but it's true, and sometimes you need to remind yourself. You have to watch the ball all the way to the bat. You should see the ball come off your bat when you hit it. Whenever I'm pitching to my son and he starts pulling his head off, I tell him to watch the ball and I give him hammer and nail imagery. Bat=hammer. Ball=nail. It works every time. If this is hard to do, then like I said above, send everything opposite way. Almost impossible to pull your head off. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 26, 2010 Share Posted March 26, 2010 QUOTE (SI1020 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 11:44 AM) I don't think I ever saw an outfielder that was as good at catching the sinking line drive as Andy Van Slyke was. For the young pups out there... http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/v/vanslan01.shtml Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 01:26 PM) For the young pups out there... http://www.baseball-reference.com/players/v/vanslan01.shtml I feel older than dirt all of a sudden. I loved watching those early 90's Pirate teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt4life Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 10:49 AM) I don't know why, but when I go up to hit, I usually end up pulling my head off the ball. But if I'm swinging in any other situation, I can keep my head still. I think it's a mental thing. This started about 5 years ago. Before that, I had really good hitting mechanics. your mechanics are garbage and everyone knows it! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsideirish71 Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (wsgdf_2 @ Mar 26, 2010 -> 02:05 PM) Oh. One other thing. Watch the ball. Sounds silly but it's true, and sometimes you need to remind yourself. You have to watch the ball all the way to the bat. You should see the ball come off your bat when you hit it. Whenever I'm pitching to my son and he starts pulling his head off, I tell him to watch the ball and I give him hammer and nail imagery. Bat=hammer. Ball=nail. It works every time. If this is hard to do, then like I said above, send everything opposite way. Almost impossible to pull your head off. I had a coach growing up that had all sorts of odd drills that seemed to really work with keeping your head on the ball and driving it. Before batting cages were all over the place. 1.) He used to paint ping pong balls different colors. He would start out with a bat, then would move to a thinner sticks such as thin metal pipes or broom handles ( kind of like stickball ) as we made more contact. You would have to yell out the color of the ball, sometimes a number if it was painted on there, and then make contact. He would start the flip drill from the side, then move behind. It really helped you keep your head on the ball, follow the movements, and make solid contact. It also allowed you to hit the ball deeper in the hitting zone, allowing you to hit to all fields. When you got into a game the ball looked like a beachball. 2.) For power, and I am sure that the telephone company is not thrilled with this. He would use a tennessee thumper, which was a pretty heavy aluminum bat. He would place a small rock in the imperfections of the telephone pole in his alley, and would have us try to drive through the pole. Edited March 27, 2010 by southsideirish71 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chisoxt Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 While I appreciated Bell's candor, I found this assesssment to be one that offers a thoroughly depresssing view of the future for this organization. I was worried about Tyler Flowers' loopy swing when I watched him late last year, and I do not get at all excited when I hear superlatives like "super utility player", "situational guy", "great hands", and "best defensive centerfielder (read: can't hit)" used to describe our supposed "better" prospects. I will say this again and repeatedly....when this organization wants to take the drafting and development of it's players seriously, that will be all right by me. Until then, we will be choking ourselves by overspending for replacement level talent. Hiring Buddy Bell and and getting rid of Dave Wilder and Duane Schafer was a good start but is it enough? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 QUOTE (chisoxt @ Mar 27, 2010 -> 11:59 AM) While I appreciated Bell's candor, I found this assesssment to be one that offers a thoroughly depresssing view of the future for this organization. I was worried about Tyler Flowers' loopy swing when I watched him late last year, and I do not get at all excited when I hear superlatives like "super utility player", "situational guy", "great hands", and "best defensive centerfielder (read: can't hit)" used to describe our supposed "better" prospects. I will say this again and repeatedly....when this organization wants to take the drafting and development of it's players seriously, that will be all right by me. Until then, we will be choking ourselves by overspending for replacement level talent. Hiring Buddy Bell and and getting rid of Dave Wilder and Duane Schafer was a good start but is it enough? You can't empty out and refill a minor league system in a year or two, especially with a GM like Kenny at the top. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
danman31 Posted March 28, 2010 Author Share Posted March 28, 2010 QUOTE (chisoxt @ Mar 27, 2010 -> 11:59 AM) While I appreciated Bell's candor, I found this assesssment to be one that offers a thoroughly depresssing view of the future for this organization. I was worried about Tyler Flowers' loopy swing when I watched him late last year, and I do not get at all excited when I hear superlatives like "super utility player", "situational guy", "great hands", and "best defensive centerfielder (read: can't hit)" used to describe our supposed "better" prospects. I will say this again and repeatedly....when this organization wants to take the drafting and development of it's players seriously, that will be all right by me. Until then, we will be choking ourselves by overspending for replacement level talent. Hiring Buddy Bell and and getting rid of Dave Wilder and Duane Schafer was a good start but is it enough? In fairness he said Bellamy was better than a situational guy. No one is saying it's a great system so I don't know why you need to read too much into phrases to figure that out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scenario Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 QUOTE (chisoxt @ Mar 27, 2010 -> 11:59 AM) I will say this again and repeatedly....when this organization wants to take the drafting and development of it's players seriously, that will be all right by me. Gordon Beckham and Dan Hudson say hello. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bighurt4life Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 QUOTE (scenario @ Mar 27, 2010 -> 05:30 PM) Gordon Beckham and Dan Hudson say hello. I will second that thought. In addition to those two, and this has been said before but i'll say it again, we have taken our "inferior" quality of prospects and turned them into valuable pieces time and time again, Jake Peavy being the most recent of those pieces. We moved a first round pick, a fifth rounder, and a 13th round pick to get an #1, cy young caliber starter. that's not too bad. In comparison, the mariners had to gut their system giving up Jones, Tillman, and George Sherrill for Eric Bedard, who is nowhere near the talent that Jake Peavy is (even pre-injury I'd take Peavy over Bedard any day of the week) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quin Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 QUOTE (bighurt4life @ Mar 28, 2010 -> 04:20 AM) I will second that thought. In addition to those two, and this has been said before but i'll say it again, we have taken our "inferior" quality of prospects and turned them into valuable pieces time and time again, Jake Peavy being the most recent of those pieces. We moved a first round pick, a fifth rounder, and a 13th round pick to get an #1, cy young caliber starter. that's not too bad. In comparison, the mariners had to gut their system giving up Jones, Tillman, and George Sherrill for Eric Bedard, who is nowhere near the talent that Jake Peavy is (even pre-injury I'd take Peavy over Bedard any day of the week) Everyone forgets the tall guy... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.