jasonxctf Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 non-biased poll, at least I hope. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 Bush had 9/11 which was pretty damn huge. So, it's really hard to compare to that. But if you look at the amount of issues that need to be addressed in such a short amount of time, he's had a lot on his plate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 The same because, lets face it, the Bush Administration did not find a solution to many of the issues that popped up then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jasonxctf Posted May 4, 2010 Author Share Posted May 4, 2010 to me, it just seems like a lot. not including issues of his choosing - Iraq - Afghanistan - Oil Spill - Huge Recession/Financial Nightmare - Unemployment issues - David Souters SCOTUS Retirement - John Stevens SCOTUS Retirement - Detroit Attack Attempt - NYC Attack Attempt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 with Bush, i mean, probably the same - although probably more. Then Clinton - he's had more. George HW - more. Before that...couldn't tell ya. Reagan had the economy and the cold war, so i don't know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CanOfCorn Posted May 5, 2010 Share Posted May 5, 2010 I voted more...but I think he's had an interesting combination of small and large problems. That's the rub. Like someone said, 9/11 was HUGE...so would that trump some of the SCOTUS retirements and the oil spill? I don't know the answer to that. But, I do think all of the "he wasn't born here" and "he's a muslim" talk should be included, as well. Just like Dubya's alleged cocaine use and heavy drinking were issues in his presidency at the beginning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bmags Posted May 6, 2010 Share Posted May 6, 2010 I mean, i guess entering into 2 wars as a result of 9/11 is a bit more than dealing with the initial 9/11. I mean, it's obviously more, but it's stuff that was applicable to Bush but he just punted on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts