MurcieOne Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:41 PM) And apparently, if the Bulls got Bosh and Wade, they'd be like the TrailBlazers from two years ago. Is this guy seriously thinking this stuff is actually legit? MotherBucher. I really hate him. I hope Ric Bucher and IraHeatBeat contract super herpres from eachother. f*** you MotherBucher. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 6, 2010 Author Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:43 PM) Well the thing is, he actually said earlier that they know they would dominate...so I'm confused... Well this clearly means the Bulls are now leading on Bosh and Wade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Portland was young talent not established stars. What a stupid comment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sircaffey Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Might be the dumbest comment of the off season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalapse Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Is there a reason why Bucher has tweeted the same thing 5 times a day for the last 3 or 4 days only worded differently? His only purpose seems to be downplaying the Bulls' chances of landing any of the big free agents. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:49 PM) Is there a reason why Bucher has tweeted the same thing 5 times a day for the last 3 or 4 days only worded differently? His only purpose seems to be downplaying the Bulls' chances of landing any of the big free agents. He's getting paid by the Knicks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 6, 2010 Author Share Posted July 6, 2010 @WojYahooNBA - Cavs officials are confident of two things now, multiple sources say: Chris Bosh won't play for them next season, but LeBron James will. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 WojYahooNBA Cavs officials are confident of two things now, multiple sources say: Chris Bosh won't play for them next season, but LeBron James will. less than 20 seconds ago via web Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MurcieOne Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (Kalapse @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:49 PM) Is there a reason why Bucher has tweeted the same thing 5 times a day for the last 3 or 4 days only worded differently? His only purpose seems to be downplaying the Bulls' chances of landing any of the big free agents. But. . . . MotherBucher doesn't hate the Bulls! @RicBucher FWIW: I don't hate the Bulls. I love what Noah has become + I see Rose/KD as the next great rivalry. But the NBA doesn't = fantasy hoops. Can't deny it. . . I really hate him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 RicFucher is a better name Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:50 PM) @WojYahooNBA - Cavs officials are confident of two things now, multiple sources say: Chris Bosh won't play for them next season, but LeBron James will. Bosh and Wade it is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 6, 2010 Author Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:52 PM) Bosh and Wade it is. The only question is where... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 WojYahooNBA Bosh has long made it clear that he doesn't want to play in Cleveland, and LeBron knew it was a longshot to sell him on it. 1 minute ago via web Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:52 PM) Bosh and Wade it is. You really think they're going to take less than a S&T ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 Bosh not going to Cleveland is very bad news for the Bulls, IMO Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 6, 2010 Author Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (Real @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:53 PM) You really think they're going to take less than a S&T ? Wade might get his cash still if he brings Bosh to Miami... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 If Miami can get Haywood in a sign and trade, and still have the assets to get Bosh along with keeping Wade, I consider them the favourites b/w them and Chicago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:53 PM) Bosh not going to Cleveland is very bad news for the Bulls, IMO If Bosh goes to Miami I'll be shocked, I mean he's been harping "Wants to play in a big market" this entire time, according to just about everyone. Chicago > Miami market-wise, so what's left: $$$ How does Bosh get the most money? Sign & Trade from TOR Which team can actually pull off a S&T with Toronto? They already said they don't want f***ing michael beasley Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (DBAHO @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 10:55 PM) If Miami can get Haywood in a sign and trade, and still have the assets to get Bosh along with keeping Wade, I consider them the favourites b/w them and Chicago. I don't even think Haywood would make Bosh/Wade change their mind either way. It's pretty simple...if Raptors decide to do the sign-and-trade with Miami for the Beasley, Chalmers, package, then Carlos Boozer will be the Bulls main FA acquisition. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scenario Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:53 PM) Bosh not going to Cleveland is very bad news for the Bulls, IMO Nah. Bosh wants S&T more than a play-date with his friends. Any bets he ends up in Houston? If so, we still have a shot at Wade. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted July 6, 2010 Author Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (Real @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 04:56 PM) If Bosh goes to Miami I'll be shocked, I mean he's been harping "Wants to play in a big market" this entire time, according to just about everyone. Chicago > Miami market-wise, so what's left: $$$ How does Bosh get the most money? Sign & Trade from TOR Which team can actually pull off a S&T with Toronto? They already said they don't want f***ing michael beasley Agree with all of this. It's up to the Bulls to pull off the Deng to Portland for Przybilla/Bayless, then Noah+ to Toronto for Bosh, then to call Wade and leverage good roster + the fact that we have his children. ...heh, we have his children. It's like NBA Ransom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamshack Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 At this point I'm tempted to tell all three of them to go f*** themselves and just sign Boozer and Reddick and save the rest of the damn money for a possible trade later on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBAHO Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 10:56 PM) I don't even think Haywood would make Bosh/Wade change their mind either way. It's pretty simple...if Raptors decide to do the sign-and-trade with Miami for the Beasley, Chalmers, package, then Carlos Boozer will be the Bulls main FA acquisition. Bosh doesn't want to play center. If the Bulls have to give up Noah to get Bosh, then most likely Bosh is going to have to play center. So my thinking was that if the Mavs would accept a future 1st round pick and a trade exception for Haywood, then Miami can do the Beasley and Chalmers deal for Bosh and they're all set. Boozer would give the Bulls a low post threat, but fathom I remember how much you roasted him in that playoff series against the Lakers. That's what you'll have to put up with him against bigger guys. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 10:58 PM) At this point I'm tempted to tell all three of them to go f*** themselves and just sign Boozer and Reddick and save the rest of the damn money for a possible trade later on. 3 Duke starters....yay! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fathom Posted July 6, 2010 Share Posted July 6, 2010 QUOTE (DBAHO @ Jul 6, 2010 -> 10:58 PM) Boozer would give the Bulls a low post threat, but fathom I remember how much you roasted him in that playoff series against the Lakers. That's what you'll have to put up with him against bigger guys. I hate Boozer's game with a passion. Adding him to the Bulls, along with Redick would be spending a lot of money for a team with a ceiling around 5th place in the Eastern Conference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.