Steff Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/US/GMA0...identified.html Hope there is a way to find each and every single person who passed around her picture and screw them the way they've screwed her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 I think lawsuit would be the situation you're looking for, Steff. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 "In this country, America, where there's a wrong, there's a remedy," LaRene said. "If the remedy doesn't exist in law now, it will be created because in this country, we find remedies for wrong." What does that mean? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 30, 2003 Author Share Posted July 30, 2003 I think lawsuit would be the situation you're looking for, Steff. Screw money! A swift kick, or 5 or 6, in the nads for the boys.. and a brazillian wax after 3 weeks of growth for the chicks! :fyou Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cerbaho-WG Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 Screw money! A swift kick, or 5 or 6, in the nads for the boys.. and a brazillian wax after 3 weeks of growth for the chicks! :fyou Could we settle on both, then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 What does that mean? SUE! If you feel you are wronged legally but there is no remedy in the law, hire a lawyer and have him make up some "emotional distress" bulls*** and SUE for 10 million dollars a pop. That's what it means. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 30, 2003 Author Share Posted July 30, 2003 What does that mean? Sounds like it means that new laws are made to punish criminals as new crimes are committed..? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 30, 2003 Author Share Posted July 30, 2003 Could we settle on both, then? "setttle on both.."? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 It's still kind of screwy. Sue for everything. The new get rich quick scheme. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 It's still kind of screwy. Sue for everything. The new get rich quick scheme. Why work when you can sue ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hotsoxchick1 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 Why work when you can sue ? better yet get a law degree and then you can pay yourself half the settlement...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 With the "r" left out of the title, I thought were going to get some kind of an Asian joke...imagine my disappointment Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 I didn't even notice the "r" was missing, but it does sound like some sort of punchline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steff Posted July 30, 2003 Author Share Posted July 30, 2003 With the "r" left out of the title, I thought were going to get some kind of an Asian joke...imagine my disappointment ROTFLMAO!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mreye Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 The chick is on Fox News right now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hotsoxchick1 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 ROTFLMAO!!!! lol steff.. i didnt notice it either....you tryin to send subliminal messages for chineese food to us or what????? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LowerCaseRepublican Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 Kind of off topic but she kinda looks like a mini Ann Coulter. Leave it to the whore media to throw news stories all over the place before verifying the facts. Let's hear it for sensationalized garbage. I can't believe so many people are falling into the hype before pre-trial stuff has even begun. And last time I checked, if he wasn't a superstar we wouldn't have this plastered all over the news. How many other sexual assault cases get so much goddamned publicity? The public clamoring for every little detail and making their minds up then a new morsel comes out and a lot of people change their opinion faster than OldRoman Nobody knows all the facts of the case and it's wrong to assume that they can make a judgment about the case without the facts. Kobe is a human being. Who knows he may have done it and he may have not. Sorry for that tangent, I've had that in my system for a while. I do believe that this is tragic what happened to this girl. With all the media attention she is getting now, I hope that clears things up for her. I'd just wanna know how her photo leaked out sooooooo damn much. You figure that people might want to verify information before they post it as fact? /refrains from State of the Union uranium joke And I noticed this: Some sites asked users to rate Lovell's looks on a scale of one to 10. Who the hell put her on hotornot.com? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 Is this the girl that the douche bag radio DJ Tom Leykis (sp?) outed? And some people say Maury has a face for radio . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bmr31 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/GMA/US/GMA0...identified.html Hope there is a way to find each and every single person who passed around her picture and screw them the way they've screwed her. Revenge is a horrible thing to want and you want it constantly. It only goes to prove your character. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 Aw, who corrected the title... BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 Is this the girl that the douche bag radio DJ Tom Leykis (sp?) outed? And some people say Maury has a face for radio . No -- Tom identified Kate Faber -- to my knowledge, that is the correct person. And yes, he definitely has a face (and body) for radio. But what does that have to do with anything? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CubKilla Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 And yes, he definitely has a face (and body) for radio. But what does that have to do with anything? Nothing. It was a knock at Maury Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 No -- Tom identified Kate Faber -- to my knowledge, that is the correct person. And yes, he definitely has a face (and body) for radio. But what does that have to do with anything? Leykis is a douche bag. He's been in trouble with the law before for beating his wife. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clujer420 Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 No -- Tom identified Kate Faber -- to my knowledge, that is the correct person. And yes, he definitely has a face (and body) for radio. But what does that have to do with anything? Leykis is a douche bag. He's been in trouble with the law before for beating his wife. How about you get your facts straight before you slander somebody? The charges were dropped, and the thing never even went to trial. Tom and his then wife were both drunk, and they got into a shouting match. She called the police, and you know what happens when a wife does that -- the guys gets arrested EVERY-FRIGGIN-TIME. Do your research before spouting off on things that you obviously know nothing about. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spiff Posted July 30, 2003 Share Posted July 30, 2003 No -- Tom identified Kate Faber -- to my knowledge, that is the correct person. And yes, he definitely has a face (and body) for radio. But what does that have to do with anything? Leykis is a douche bag. He's been in trouble with the law before for beating his wife. How about you get your facts straight before you slander somebody? The charges were dropped, and the thing never even went to trial. Tom and his then wife were both drunk, and they got into a shouting match. She called the police, and you know what happens when a wife does that -- the guys gets arrested EVERY-FRIGGIN-TIME. Do your research before spouting off on things that you obviously know nothing about. haha ok he's not a douche bag, you're right. he only said the rape victim's name on the air with no reservations. here's your goddamn research. his then-wife Susan told cops that he struck her in the head with a drinking glass during an argument in their home. Leykis then allegedly "pushed the victim's head into a brick fireplace" and "threatened to kill her," http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/leykis1.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.