WhiteSoxfan1986 Posted June 8, 2010 Share Posted June 8, 2010 http://deadspin.com/5555714/this-is-pete-roses-corked-bat Shouldn't surprise anyone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Anyone could have corked that after Rose got rid of it. The unbroken change of ownership does not matter at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 QUOTE (kev211 @ Jun 13, 2010 -> 01:21 AM) Anyone could have corked that after Rose got rid of it. The unbroken change of ownership does not matter at all. Rose is a piece of s***. I wouldn't doubt for a second that he corked his bat. I'm surprised anyone would doubt it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Jun 13, 2010 -> 10:47 PM) Rose is a piece of s***. I wouldn't doubt for a second that he corked his bat. I'm surprised anyone would doubt it. I agree with you 100%. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ptatc Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 14, 2010 -> 12:33 PM) I agree with you 100%. Good ballplayer, piece of crap as a human being. No doubt he would do it "to get an edge." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kev211 Posted June 14, 2010 Share Posted June 14, 2010 Not saying he didn't just saying finding cork in one of his bats that he has not touched in years is not enough evidence to say he did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts