Steve9347 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 01:46 PM) I hate to say it, but you have to shop Seabrook if you can. Sh*t, I'd be happy if we moved Seabs, honestly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 01:46 PM) I hate to say it, but you have to shop Seabrook if you can. It would have been much easier to do that if they hadn't signed him to an extension a few months ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 02:02 PM) It would have been much easier to do that if they hadn't signed him to an extension a few months ago. Some team may be looking for a physical "top pairing" type D man to anchor their blue line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I guess I'm in the minority here. I think Seabs is a solid d man and the only one we have with any toughness. He can move the puck with one hand while knocking someone on their ass with the other. He had a bad stretch here, but he'll bounce back. The only concern I have are his concussions. Dude has been knocked around silly this year...so if that's the main idea behind moving him...then I think it's a valid concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (RockRaines @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 02:12 PM) Some team may be looking for a physical "top pairing" type D man to anchor their blue line. True, but it's much harder to find a team like that when has a $5.8M cap number for the next 5 seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G&T Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (Controlled Chaos @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 03:28 PM) I guess I'm in the minority here. I think Seabs is a solid d man and the only one we have with any toughness. He can move the puck with one hand while knocking someone on their ass with the other. He had a bad stretch here, but he'll bounce back. The only concern I have are his concussions. Dude has been knocked around silly this year...so if that's the main idea behind moving him...then I think it's a valid concern. The way he was playing the last couple of games tells me he was still injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 02:37 PM) True, but it's much harder to find a team like that when has a $5.8M cap number for the next 5 seasons. Maybe, I mean Campbell was signed when the team felt they had a hole to fill on the top D pairing, so there are teams out there that will splurge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiliIrishHammock24 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 02:56 PM) Sh*t, I'd be happy if we moved Seabs, honestly. It would make my offseason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I feel like selling low on Seabrook is just a bad idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve9347 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 04:42 PM) I feel like selling low on Seabrook is just a bad idea. I think it's all about cap space and flexibility, but no one is advocating giving him away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 04:42 PM) I feel like selling low on Seabrook is just a bad idea. Who are you going to move then to clear some space? He's easily one of the easier D men to move with a large contract. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 05:25 PM) You move Seabrook, and the small glimpse of toughness you had on your blueline is now gone, let alone on the team. While the opposition doesn't ever fear that Seabrook is on the ice, he brings a physical presence to a team that is SEVERELY lacking in that department. I've always thought Seabrook was a little overrated(certainly not an Olympic caliber D man), but he would be difficult to replace. WHo would you move (we all know it cant be soupy)? Personally I would be for moving Seabs or Keith if we could sign someone like Bieksa for cheaper. Edited April 27, 2011 by RockRaines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That funky motion Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 The cap should be going up 2 to 3 mil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Wow, mtl ties it up with a 100mph slapped from subban Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zenryan Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 BRUINS!!! They did everything in their power to hand Montreal this series. Just stupid penalty after stupid penalty. I'm curious on how they'll break my heart in the next series. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 QUOTE (zenryan @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 09:12 PM) BRUINS!!! They did everything in their power to hand Montreal this series. Just stupid penalty after stupid penalty. I'm curious on how they'll break my heart in the next series. Great game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 QUOTE (zenryan @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 09:12 PM) BRUINS!!! They did everything in their power to hand Montreal this series. Just stupid penalty after stupid penalty. I'm curious on how they'll break my heart in the next series. They were my pick to win it all at the start of the playoffs. For all the upsets that usually happen, the only lower seeds to advance were the 5 seeds, and neither of those are really considered upsets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 QUOTE (Tony82087 @ Apr 28, 2011 -> 05:08 PM) I honestly don't know, and glad I'm not in the position to decide. Campbell obviously should be shopped incredibly hard, but as previously mentioned, a deal being worked out is incredibly unlikely. I'm completely open to moving Kane, but from a hockey and marketing standpoint, it probably doesn't make that much sense. Without Kane, any depth they had a forward is gone, and right or wrong Kane is the face of this franchise, so that probably isn't happening either. While they have a little bit of money to play with, the Hawks still aren't sitting very pretty. They are still going to enter the new season probably counting on too many unknowns, but that's what happens when you have to overpay for talent.... Nice read on some Campbell options. http://committedindians.com/is-brian-campb...the-blackhawks/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Share Posted April 29, 2011 QUOTE (Controlled Chaos @ Apr 29, 2011 -> 10:26 AM) Nice read on some Campbell options. http://committedindians.com/is-brian-campb...the-blackhawks/ I still can't see the Hawks paying that much money for him to play somewhere else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 29, 2011 -> 10:54 AM) I still can't see the Hawks paying that much money for him to play somewhere else. I agree. It's not like the Huet situation where he was just a bad player you had no use for. Campbell is still pretty good and the team definitely misses him when he's been out with an injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted April 29, 2011 Author Share Posted April 29, 2011 QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Apr 29, 2011 -> 12:17 PM) I agree. It's not like the Huet situation where he was just a bad player you had no use for. Campbell is still pretty good and the team definitely misses him when he's been out with an injury. And five years of paying out versus one is a huge difference too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Controlled Chaos Posted April 29, 2011 Share Posted April 29, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Apr 29, 2011 -> 12:25 PM) And five years of paying out versus one is a huge difference too. I agree with you guys. Unfortunately, I think Campbell is here for the remainder of his contract. ...check out the comments below the article as well. http://committedindians.com/nhl-free-agenc...y-is-available/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan1 Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Go Sharks and Go Predators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clyons Posted May 2, 2011 Share Posted May 2, 2011 Caps down 0-2 headed to Tampa. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted May 2, 2011 Author Share Posted May 2, 2011 QUOTE (SoxFan1 @ May 1, 2011 -> 08:31 PM) Go Sharks and Go Predators. X 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts