bulokis Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Vancouver is playing more desperate. Hawks better wake up if not for Crawford we be down by more than a goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (bulokis @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 03:50 AM) Vancouver is playing more desperate. Hawks better wake up if not for Crawford we be down by more than a goal I would agree with that. Vancouver is playing for keeps. Thing is, at 1-0, if we could slop in a goal in the third, all bets are off. Might shake them a bit and their fans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 The difference is one team can keep the puck in the zone and the other team lets every puck get by them. My hockey knowledge is not deep enough to really get critical here, but I just dont understand what the Hawks defensemen are doing on offense. They just have to keep those pucks in the zone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 27, 2011 -> 03:53 AM) The difference is one team can keep the puck in the zone and the other team lets every puck get by them. My hockey knowledge is not deep enough to really get critical here, but I just dont understand what the Hawks defensemen are doing on offense. They just have to keep those pucks in the zone. Yes, this game so far for sure. It hasn't been that way the last 3 games, however. This game, the Canucks are playing like the Canucks. The Hawks are teetering on the brink of it being OVA. It probably should be 4-0 right now. Crawford was amazing in period No. 2. It definitely should be 2-0 at least, that's why I still think we have a chance. If the Hawks play like they want it and tie it up ... wow. Do we all agree it's OVA if Vancouver takes a 2-0 lead? Edited April 27, 2011 by greg775 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Lets hope we dont have to worry about 2-0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Really? What the hell, and why completely foul, penalty shot is way easier than what he would have had to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Penalty shot, oh no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 f*** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 My god. We catch a break. STart playing Hawks!! This series can be yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Even the Canucks fans cant hate on Crawford after what hes done tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Corey Effin Crawford Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Maybe you are right about Hawks being tired. No offense still. Not crisp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 this game is over, Vancouver is destroying the Hawks in the offensive end, sigh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Crawford has been amazing; we're not even testting Luongo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Vancouver forecheck is RIDICULOUS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 If this was a boxing match, Vancouver would be up big on points. I'm still holding out hope we can slop in a goal to tie it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Sea brook is obviously still concussed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonkeyKongerko Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Seabrook having a horrible game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Real Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 QUOTE (DonkeyKongerko @ Apr 26, 2011 -> 11:17 PM) Seabrook having a horrible game Him and Hjalmarsson both having a pretty bad game, Quenneville needs to leave the f***ing lines alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 There was the chance to tie it up. That mighta been all she wrote. Good save by L. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Wow Luongo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Bad karma today from all my Chi friends mocking Luongo as well as all the bum of the week votes he got on the Grobber last night. Damn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Crawford with more money saves. If we could just muster one goal, one damn goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 Could fate really be so cruel and have the Hawks some how tie a game they have no business being in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soxbadger Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 IT CAN BE SO CRUEL Wow that is unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts