chw42 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 03:41 PM) It actually is a surprise. Not the order of pitchers but the runs per game. I figured it would range from the low 3s to the high 3s. I guess our offense isn't that bad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justBLAZE Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 White Sox: 3 vs Braves, 3 vs Cubs, 3 at Royals Twins: 3 at Brewers, 3 at Mets, 3 vs Tigers Tigers: 3 at Mets, 3 at Braves, 3 at Twins I'm pumped! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 We're averaging 4.3 runs per game. Something about those numbers isn't right. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 QUOTE (chw42 @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 04:50 PM) We're averaging 4.3 runs per game. Something about those numbers isn't right. Maybe we're really bad against bullpens? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheChrisSamsa Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 QUOTE (justBLAZE @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 03:48 PM) White Sox: 3 vs Braves, 3 vs Cubs, 3 at Royals Twins: 3 at Brewers, 3 at Mets, 3 vs Tigers Tigers: 3 at Mets, 3 at Braves, 3 at Twins I'm pumped! Not a bad stretch to keep the forward progress going. Looks like the schedule is on our side! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 03:57 PM) Maybe we're really bad against bullpens? Are those the runs scored from the start of the game to the end of the game during his start or are those the runs scored while he was in the game divided by the amount of innings the guy's pitched? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (chw42 @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 03:50 PM) We're averaging 4.3 runs per game. Something about those numbers isn't right. That's because the numbers aren't right. Buehrle: 4.1 Danks: 4.3 Floyd: 3.4 Garcia: 5.3 Peavy: 4.6 http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CH...-pitching.shtml Even if you go by RS/IP, they still aren't the right ones. I don't know where they came from. Buehrle: 4.2 Danks: 4.5 Floyd: 2.8 Garcia: 5.5 Peavy: 4.8 Edited June 20, 2010 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chw42 Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 QUOTE (Felix @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 04:13 PM) That's because the numbers aren't right. Buehrle: 4.1 Danks: 4.3 Floyd: 3.4 Garcia: 5.3 Peavy: 4.6 http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CH...-pitching.shtml Even if you go by RS/IP, they still aren't the right ones. I don't know where they came from. Buehrle: 4.2 Danks: 4.5 Floyd: 2.8 Garcia: 5.5 Peavy: 4.8 They're from ESPN. I knew they wouldn't get it right... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThunderBolt Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 White Sox baseball is fun again. This is starting to look like a team that just needs another bat to stay around for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 (edited) QUOTE (Thunderbolt @ Jun 20, 2010 -> 03:01 PM) White Sox baseball is fun again. This is starting to look like a team that just needs another bat to stay around for a while. Winning just smells sweeter. We got the wind at our backs so let's ride it as long as we can. Don't stop ! Get it ! Get it ! Edited June 21, 2010 by CaliSoxFanViaSWside Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heads22 Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 May have been the Pirates and Nats, but ya gotta beat the bad teams. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaliSoxFanViaSWside Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 Putz with 13 straight scoreless outings. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg775 Posted June 21, 2010 Share Posted June 21, 2010 As much as I love Jenks, there's nothing wrong with letting Putz or Thornton close once in a while. If Ozzie feels the vibe on a given day, I trust that vibe. Today mighta been the day Bobby failed. Good job, Oz, going with Putz for whatever reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.