Jump to content

Jenks will Close again


WhiteSoxfan1986

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (lostfan @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 10:22 PM)
1998, sophomore year vs. Harper, I wanted a fastball and he gave me one belly button-high and I hit it like 420 feet to dead center. It felt awesome. I didn't even know I could do that.

 

Bryce Harper's older brother or another Harper?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (lostfan @ Aug 9, 2010 -> 09:34 PM)
Let Putz allow like... 3 times as many runs as he does and then he'll have earned the treatment Jenks gets when he does it. With Putz right now it's "oh s***," with Jenks it's "oh no, not again!"

 

Not to mention Putz road era going into that at-bat...

 

0.00. That's right... 0.00 era on the road. How anyone can question that decision is absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ Aug 14, 2010 -> 09:55 PM)
So how do you Putz apologists want to explain the latest meltdown?

This f***ing sucks. WHY IS CLOSING GAMES SO HARD FOR THIS TEAM!!!

 

The Twins pull out anyone and everyone and make them a closer and they work. We spend $10 million this season to bring in 2 closers, one to cover for the other, and we can't finish anything off after the AS break.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Aug 14, 2010 -> 10:19 PM)
The kind of taunting JJ deserves after tonight.

 

I thought he'd be the money guy, and he's been crap too.

"Putz apologists"

 

...scroll up and see who he was arguing with, or trying to, a few days ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Paint it Black @ Aug 14, 2010 -> 09:55 PM)
So how do you Putz apologists want to explain the latest meltdown?

Was it your intention to bait people to anger with this post?

 

You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use this bulletin board to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, or otherwise violative of any law.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (J.Reedfan8 @ Aug 10, 2010 -> 05:50 AM)
Not to mention Putz road era going into that at-bat...

 

0.00. That's right... 0.00 era on the road. How anyone can question that decision is absurd.

 

 

What's the old adage? You win some and you lose some. All you can hope for is at the end of the season you win more than you lose

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (knightni @ Aug 14, 2010 -> 09:25 PM)
Was it your intention to bait people to anger with this post?

No it was not. I stand by the fact that Putz has not been able to get anyone out the last two weeks. I'm not sure if it's a slump, or a bit of a statistical correction of some sorts. Maybe the day off on Monday will correct a pen that has been overused the past few weeks. Either way, Putz should not see a situation where we are leading or trailing by 2 runs. Santos and Sale have been getting hitters out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...